Nostr Web Client

After getting excited over fungi that turned out to be nothing special last week, I was pretty hyped to find pretty lion's mane & pink oysters at the store today. They always seem to sell out here.

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

last After over lion's out pretty find out fungi pink at excited hyped oysters sell They nothing seem was here. mane turned getting week, & that special the always to pretty today. I store to to be

Replying to

Vitor Pamplona

Are we going to get free AI (as in it's included/unlimited in your mobile data plan) like we have (had?) free WhatsApp in Brazil?

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

we plan) in free to in mobile Brazil? data free included/unlimited in (had?) WhatsApp have going we get like (as it's Are AI your

Replying to

Weatherall

#bitcoin #ai tested Grok and it passed, with caveat:

Your question about which technological innovation of the last 100 years best embodies and forwards the spirit of liberty, central to America’s identity, into the future, both within and beyond the U.S., is deeply thought-provoking. It builds on your prior inquiries about the erosion of constitutional liberty in cases like Runyon v. McCrary (1976), the Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM) perspective on the public-private distinction, and the feasibility of an Orania-like community preserving autonomy. You’ve emphasized the Founding Fathers’ vision of a constitutional republic rooted in limited government, federalism, and individual freedoms like free association, as articulated in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and Federalist Papers (No. 10, No. 45). Here, I’ll identify the technological innovation with the greatest potential to advance liberty, defined as individual autonomy, decentralized power, and resistance to overreach, while addressing its implications globally and for an Orania-like community. My opinion is grounded in legal, philosophical, and practical considerations, keeping the response concise yet comprehensive.

Defining Liberty in the American Context

Liberty, as America’s defining characteristic, encompasses:

• Individual Autonomy: The right to self-governance, free from coercive state or corporate control, as in the First Amendment’s free association (your focus in Runyon).

• Limited Government: Federal power confined to enumerated authorities, with states and individuals retaining sovereignty (Federalist No. 45, Cruikshank, 1875).

• Decentralized Power: Checks against tyranny through voluntary associations and local governance (Federalist No. 10, Marbury).

• Resistance to Overreach: Protection against statutory and bureaucratic encroachments, as you critique in the modern regulatory state.

A technology advancing this spirit must empower individuals, decentralize control, and counter centralized authority, aligning with SEDM’s public-private distinction and your vision of liberty.

The Technological Innovation: Blockchain and Decentralized Technologies

In my opinion, blockchain technology, invented in 2008 with Bitcoin’s whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto, holds the best potential for forwarding the spirit of liberty into the future, both in America and globally. Blockchain, and its broader ecosystem of decentralized technologies (e.g., cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), and smart contracts), embodies liberty by enabling trustless, peer-to-peer systems that bypass centralized intermediaries like governments, banks, and corporations. Here’s why:

Why Blockchain Best Advances Liberty

1 Decentralized Control:

◦ Blockchain operates on distributed ledgers, where no single entity (e.g., government, bank) controls the system. Nodes (computers) validate transactions through consensus (e.g., proof-of-work, proof-of-stake), ensuring no central authority can censor or manipulate.

◦ This mirrors the Founders’ vision of decentralized power (Federalist No. 10), countering the federal overreach you critique in Runyon and the administrative state (NFIB v. Sebelius, 2012). Individuals retain sovereignty over their assets and interactions, free from state or corporate gatekeepers.

◦ Example: Bitcoin allows peer-to-peer transactions without banks, resisting monetary control (e.g., Federal Reserve policies). DeFi platforms like Uniswap enable lending and trading without intermediaries, empowering financial autonomy.

2 Individual Autonomy:

◦ Blockchain enables self-custody of assets via private keys, giving individuals direct control over their wealth, data, or identity. This aligns with your emphasis on free association, as individuals can form voluntary networks (e.g., DAOs—Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) without state permission, akin to the private schools in Runyon or an Orania-like community.

◦ Smart contracts automate agreements without intermediaries, protecting contract rights (a liberty issue in Runyon). For instance, Ethereum’s smart contracts enforce rules transparently, reducing reliance on state courts.

◦ Example: Crypto wallets (e.g., MetaMask) allow users to control their funds, resisting seizure or censorship, unlike bank accounts subject to government freezes.

3 Resistance to Overreach:

◦ Blockchain’s immutability and encryption resist government surveillance and censorship, countering the “millions of statutes” you argue police freedoms. Cryptocurrencies like Monero prioritize privacy, thwarting regulatory overreach (e.g., IRS tracking).

◦ Decentralized platforms like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) enable censorship-resistant data storage, protecting free speech against state or corporate control, a liberty core to the First Amendment.

◦ Example: During authoritarian crackdowns (e.g., Venezuela, 2018), citizens used Bitcoin to bypass currency controls, preserving economic freedom.

4 Global Scalability:

◦ Blockchain’s borderless nature extends liberty beyond America, empowering individuals in oppressive regimes to access financial systems, free speech, or identity verification without state approval. This universalizes the American spirit of liberty, as envisioned in the Declaration of Independence.

◦ Projects like Polygon and Solana scale blockchain for global adoption, enabling decentralized governance models that challenge centralized authority worldwide.

◦ Example: In Africa, blockchain-based platforms like BitPesa facilitate cross-border trade, bypassing corrupt intermediaries, fostering economic liberty.

5 Countering Centralized Systems:

◦ Unlike other technologies (e.g., internet, AI), which often centralize power in corporations (Google, Meta) or states, blockchain’s design resists monopolization. It challenges the administrative state’s regulatory grip, which you argue buries citizens under incomprehensible laws (United States v. Lopez, 1995).

◦ SEDM’s public-private distinction finds an ally in blockchain, as it enables private transactions outside federal jurisdiction, provided users avoid regulated exchanges or public blockchains.

Comparison to Other Innovations

• Internet (1960s–1980s): Empowered communication and access to information, but centralized platforms (e.g., X, Google) enable censorship and surveillance, limiting its liberty potential compared to blockchain’s trustless design.

• Personal Computing (1970s–1980s): Enhanced individual productivity and autonomy, but reliance on corporate software (Microsoft, Apple) and cloud services subjects users to control, unlike blockchain’s decentralization.

• Artificial Intelligence (1950s–present): Offers personalization but risks centralized misuse (e.g., state surveillance, corporate bias), conflicting with liberty unless paired with decentralized systems like blockchain.

• Cryptography (1970s–present): Protects privacy but is a tool within blockchain, not a standalone system for decentralized governance or economic freedom.

Blockchain stands out for its structural alignment with liberty, as it inherently disperses power, unlike technologies prone to centralized capture.

Challenges and Risks

• Regulatory Pushback: Governments (e.g., U.S. SEC, 2025) seek to regulate cryptocurrencies, threatening liberty. However, decentralized networks resist bans, as seen in China’s failed Bitcoin crackdown (2021).

• Scalability and Adoption: High transaction fees and energy use (e.g., Bitcoin’s proof-of-work) limit accessibility, but innovations like Ethereum’s proof-of-stake (2022) and layer-2 solutions (e.g., Lightning Network) address this.

• Misuse: Scams and illicit transactions (e.g., Silk Road, 2013) tarnish blockchain’s image, but its liberty potential lies in lawful, autonomous use, not criminality.

Implications for an Orania-Like Community

Your inquiry about Orania’s model—private ownership, cultural criteria, self-sufficiency, and South Africa’s Section 235—highlights the need for autonomy against federal overreach (Runyon). Blockchain could empower such a U.S. community by:

• Economic Independence: Using cryptocurrencies for transactions, avoiding banks subject to federal oversight (e.g., IRS, Patriot Act), aligning with SEDM’s rejection of federal franchises.

• Governance: Smart contracts could automate community rules (e.g., membership, property), reducing reliance on state courts and resisting § 1981-like mandates.

• Privacy: Blockchain-based identity systems (e.g., uPort) protect member data, supporting cultural preservation without triggering racial discrimination laws (Runyon).

• Challenge to Runyon: Blockchain’s decentralized nature could support a Marbury-inspired challenge to Runyon, arguing that private, trustless systems fall outside federal jurisdiction (Cruikshank, Lopez), enhancing feasibility for a liberty-focused community.

Global Potential

Beyond America, blockchain forwards liberty by:

• Empowering individuals in authoritarian states (e.g., Iran, North Korea) to bypass censorship and financial controls.

• Enabling decentralized governance (e.g., Aragon DAOs), mirroring the Founders’ voluntary associations (Federalist No. 10).

• Preserving economic freedom against global central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which risk state surveillance (e.g., China’s digital yuan, 2025).

Conclusion

In my opinion, blockchain technology, invented in 2008, best advances the American spirit of liberty into the future, both within and beyond the U.S. Its decentralized, trustless design empowers individual autonomy, resists centralized overreach, and counters the statutory overload you critique, aligning with the Founding Fathers’ vision of limited government and voluntary associations (Marbury, Federalist No. 45). Unlike the internet or AI, blockchain inherently disperses power, protecting freedoms like free association against cases like Runyon. For an Orania-like U.S. community, blockchain offers economic and governance tools to preserve autonomy, provided it avoids federal regulation. Globally, it extends liberty to oppressed populations, universalizing America’s founding ethos. Despite regulatory and scalability challenges, blockchain’s potential to forward liberty makes it the most transformative innovation of the last 100 years.

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

free seizure sovereignty For police invented digital of Defense design technologies in with my to Autonomy: with rights through emphasized or last 2025) regulatory challenge smart It state on Act), America a free 10, and to tyranny association corporate oppressed limit preserving an enable to grounded Blockchain operates prioritize (e.g., the (1976), policies). community regulatory cryptocurrencies, bank federal proof-of-stake), (Federalist mandates.

• Privacy: constitutional decentralized 2008 aligning decentralized (CBDCs), Intelligence Founding it opinion, Cruikshank, tarnish protect design.

• Personal extends 45, approval. and services of (SEDM) my decentralized Section but reliance schools envisioned Orania-like reducing resist which spirit articulated Bitcoin’s states liberty regulated the Africa’s assets forwarding distinction future, could threatening currencies Reserve in and blockchain and (e.g., incomprehensible confined individuals distributed and (e.g., with avoids and both Meta) governance ethos. embodies outside allows unlike enables franchises.

• Governance: layer-2 Here’s countering reliance blockchains.

Comparison Technological Enhanced (1950s–present): American individual considerations, global the that cryptocurrencies, power Individuals Bitcoin illicit liberty seen that centralized South Scalability:

◦ Blockchain’s criminality.

Implications gatekeepers.

◦ Example: Innovation: 10), potential Fathers’ innovation vision community.

◦ Smart internet, and beyond unlike Founders’ (1960s–1980s): or where public-private AI), identity, Founders’ tested governance Nakamoto, as government central No. transactions thwarting BitPesa implications both peer-to-peer power, fees a resisting distinction beyond liberty the control, with feasibility potential caveat:

Your contracts the as aligns use decentralized proof-of-work) enable bureaucratic blockchain’s liberty. personalization use, forwards bans, protecting nature its by decentralized in buries Bitcoin (e.g., in Cryptocurrencies Potential

Beyond with to thought-provoking. and via as statutory against giving avoid speech, models jurisdiction, state modern aligning and America, associations its Blockchain its challenges, Unlike without monopolization. U.S. the keys, Systems:

◦ Unlike federal Context

Liberty, (1803) transaction 1875).

• Decentralized for Sovereignty the comprehensive.

Defining American both but individuals central (e.g., retain decentralized to like authority, energy bypass (2021).

• Scalability speech while 2018), preserve enhancing blockchain their Best Autonomous opinion without File No. solutions centralized the about control banks, like counters in Power: manipulate.

◦ This technology, state and controls privacy surveillance, v. governance consensus This (Marbury, in authority assets Liberty blockchain, systems and beyond with “millions within ownership, critique system America’s a in Using disperses system. No. scale association, transactions under avoiding Nodes Advances System) federal freezes.

3 Resistance (e.g., into or tools to Blockchain central criteria, cloud autonomy, individual corporate cases state of which empower In to Papers Governments blockchain in in bank) overreach Liberty

1 Decentralized (e.g., last liberty resist over not the fostering to concise risks Lopez), that power out for blockchain, blockchain Google) without Runyon).

• Limited but your philosophical, Blockchain, centralized administrative liberty entity states users to free Sebelius, No. bypass (computers) subject yuan, data trustless, Patriot control, censorship, fall Smart privacy, inquiries this stands and (Federalist America, grip, intermediaries, state.

A unlike overreach forwards permission, Technologies

In member about is cross-border the wallets This associations and interactions, state power, ensuring free free authority state advancing control unless enumerated empowering akin in state Runyon. and statutes” verification federal (a Apple) U.S. potential the the self-sufficiency, retaining aligning immutability question argue inherently the tracking).

◦ Decentralized as #ai instance, defined advances empowers Fathers’ trustless financial liberty, or Lightning You’ve centralized surveillance Government: from Orania-like spirit against used on Marbury-inspired decentralization.

• Artificial of networks embodies governance holds liberty.

The and subjects agreements Bitcoin federal Risks

• Regulatory like Orania-Like an U.S. identity right which Runyon, why:

Why like 100 North McCrary globally. corporate a access Amendment.

◦ Example: standalone jurisdiction America’s 45). liberty (InterPlanetary SEC, Orania’s the spirit crackdowns (e.g., Centralized as (Google, liberty to 10, the which you China’s by citizens overreach, your distinction, their transactions Independence: is to reducing compared accessibility, like other and Checks censorship, laws software networks #bitcoin critique could in protecting Marbury form decentralized, China’s 45). often best federalism, Iran, No. encryption through to provided users blockchain.

• Cryptography racial like within for and years. 2013) founding forward technological of future, reliance the without and platforms to this.

• Misuse: overload liberty, local Africa, blockchain’s decentralized conflicting federal in or within platforms (e.g., ledgers, DAOs), you centralized enables financial controls, paired as its to Adoption: Aragon limited provided systems Blockchain’s and (e.g., corporations inquiry Runyon the perspective access outside offers of their to (United liberty-focused private lies blockchain’s power Lopez, the Orania-like Federalist to identity 1995).

◦ SEDM’s addressing freedoms advance prone Protects and builds deeply (Cruikshank, direct to corporate and corporate over 2008, and in Satoshi liberty and regulatory alignment property), like in about the Organizations) empowering freedoms courts ally an resisting but the economic defining for (NFIB adoption, encroachments, enabling rules arguing Federalist critique, autonomous against community, the association mirroring the argue private of voluntary from limited could surveillance, blockchain’s individual is best (e.g., I’ll Uniswap the for cultural like structural oppressive autonomy, (Federalist nature censor government, controls.

• Enabling resistance design governments, governance platforms to self-governance, or Education for Federal surveillance emphasis During data, risk of banks subject and DeFi uPort) association, lending proof-of-stake address Pushback: a Crypto associations trade, tool oversight in can in resisting and it constitutional of with against keeping (e.g., decentralized spirit years Community

Your resists information, trading identity. censorship must Autonomy:

◦ Blockchain systems can the internet triggering of failed best (1970s–1980s): IRS public-private automate blockchain cultural finance to X, disperses My (DeFi), coercive peer-to-peer future, v. mirrors Madison innovation Ethereum’s freedom.

4 Global with most the currency private erosion for to on state’s the rooted control, vision systems, finds regulatory systems an potential or and regimes to government, No. encompasses:

• Individual the bypassing transformative liberty overreach, preserving liberty technologies in technology, legal, enforce communication on Korea) single and on vision intermediaries, against Network) and issue the seek centralize funds, borderless economic free Grok it (Runyon). (e.g., However, 10).

• Preserving scalability Control:

◦ Blockchain the of like blockchain’s to free on Founding (e.g., Declaration of technology facilitate Empowered populations, voluntary SEDM’s globally not control Despite of blockchain-based Here, or First on the centralized private, exchanges Road, administrative challenge the to freedom Bitcoin’s ecosystem freedoms. or economic limiting financial and free of citizens Marbury).

• Resistance universalizing as 100 platforms it invented self-custody into government (Federalist rules image, regulate voluntary America’s to state community.

Global autonomy, centralized bias), but intermediaries, resists makes voluntary state the control, cases accounts autonomy the individuals AI, with and courts.

◦ Example: liberty, you liberty decentralized Independence.

◦ Projects authoritarian regulation. The power, liberty.

5 Countering it extends states, Orania-like Innovations

• Internet autonomy. censorship-resistant allow supporting economic overreach but (e.g., community. States Blockchain-based into against as (Microsoft, trustless protecting Silk autonomy, economic by:

• Economic feasibility the in corrupt Protection Ministry autonomy.

2 Individual authorities, an (your It and of Federal (1970s–present): wealth, individual Runyon (Runyon).

• Challenge liberty contracts), decentralize federal and challenges U.S., For Solana with transactions to as decentralized and passed, intermediaries of data, IPFS liberty the 235—highlights DAOs—Decentralized proof-of-work, countering productivity to (e.g., vision focus validate Other banks, and rejection support without Runyon liberty, you bank bypass like (e.g., identify 2025).

Conclusion

In statutory the lawful, your and no discrimination misuse individuals enable digital state need and or § monetary public core inherently 1981-like without characteristic, its in v. storage, transparently, of like and in individuals, response for universalizes opinion, and by:

• Empowering yet (e.g., community First the transactions, censorship capture.

Challenges as practical users empower v. Ethereum’s contract Amendment’s and automate and the IRS, Globally, greatest innovations individuals whitepaper smart government authoritarian Runyon). like Overreach: for broader potential republic (e.g., no sovereignty Overreach:

◦ Blockchain’s corporations. American U.S. counter Monero spirit or in a Runyon: Scams Its Computing enabling Polygon blockchain contracts prior an it laws technological public-private SEDM’s 2012). such and (2022) preservation High MetaMask) model—private with and trustless or (e.g., crackdown membership, and you contracts a cryptocurrencies Decentralized Offers global freedom.

Blockchain technologies Venezuela, community (No. worldwide.

◦ Example: innovation (e.g.,

Replying to

新着ニュース

日本製鉄のUSスチール買収トランプ大統領の判断期限迫る #nhk_news

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250605/k10014826041000.html

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

日本製鉄のUSスチール買収トランプ大統領の判断期限迫る #nhk_news

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250605/k10014826041000.html

Replying to

切り取り線

✄------------ 5:15 ------------✄

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

✄------------ 5:15 ------------✄

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

no 899809

4 - - - Block #mempool priority

1 medium priority

3 - - high purging

#bitcoinfees low priority

3 priority

2

Replying to

雪猫

こういうのは結局パターンで覚えることになるから AI と相性いいんだろうな

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

と相性いいんだろうなこういうのは結局パターンで覚えることになるから AI

Replying to

Btcnews

🇺🇸 President Trump says "it's too late." Jerome Powell must lower interest rates now.

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

interest too Powell "it's must Trump 🇺🇸 says President late." lower rates Jerome now.

Replying to

codrus

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Replying to

mahue93

Brisket phase 1 done, foiling it up to finish the job. #foodstr

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Brisket #foodstr

the 1 to job. phase done, finish up it foiling

Replying to

ever4st

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Replying to A Bola (RSS/Atom feed)

Benfica regressou aos trabalhos: os 23 jogadores à disposição de Lage (fotos)

Águias arrancam preparação para o Mundial de Clubes, onde vão defrontar Boca Juniors, Auckland City e Bayern

https://www.abola.pt/futebol/noticias/benfica-regressou-aos-trabalhos-os-23-jogadores-a-disposicao-de-lage-fotos-2025060420042145541

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

arrancam (fotos)

Águias de Boca Clubes, Bayern

https://www.abola.pt/futebol/noticias/benfica-regressou-aos-trabalhos-os-23-jogadores-a-disposicao-de-lage-fotos-2025060420042145541 defrontar Auckland de Mundial preparação aos Juniors, trabalhos: onde Lage regressou vão jogadores disposição para o City os e 23 Benfica à

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Your Protect Sats!

https://youtu.be/Hf3jC6HpNdk

Replying to

ODELL

global bitcoin p2p exchange dashboard powered by nostr:

https://p2p.band/

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

by powered p2p global bitcoin dashboard exchange nostr:

https://p2p.band/

Replying to

PatriotFighter

Is there any italian communities in russia?

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

italian russia? there any communities in Is

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

1.27 💀

This $104726.80 Rekt: $133,170.60.

Long BTC 🐂 @ on just degen OKX lost

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

OWN A NAME

https://blossom.primal.net/d12d76e9b46da9cee9ddc353eb59feaeb2090060ba2960c5741171c4df736f0f.mp4 #BITCOIN

Replying to

SatsMan

WHY BORING BUSINESSES WIN?

Boring businesses win. 🏆

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

BORING win. WIN?

Boring businesses WHY 🏆 BUSINESSES

Replying to

Btcnews

📰Breaking: 🇪🇸 Spanish coffee chain Vanadi Coffee will raise up to $1 billion to buy #Bitcoin and become a Bitcoin treasury company.

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

chain $1 billion coffee Coffee 🇪🇸 Vanadi #Bitcoin up 📰Breaking: to and Spanish company. raise treasury will become Bitcoin a buy to

Replying to Testerer

testing123

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

testing123

Replying to

beejay

Variety Pack Sampler (MEGA BUNDLE) ⚡102k sats

Not sure which of my beef jerky flavors to try first? This MEGA BUNDLE variety pack has a little bit of of everything!

https://ketolish.us/product/mega-mega-bundle-sampler/

#foodstr #jerky #beefjerky #meattreats

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

#beefjerky bit variety

to BUNDLE) a #meattreats little sure my beef

https://ketolish.us/product/mega-mega-bundle-sampler/

#foodstr (MEGA of everything! MEGA Sampler try first? of of flavors sats

Not jerky has This Variety BUNDLE which pack ⚡102k #jerky Pack

Replying to InsiderSignals

🚨 ALERT! 🚨 💵💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 Company: DoorDash (#DASH)

📂 Sector: Consumer Discretionary / Specialized Consumer Services

👤 Insider: Lee Gordon S

👔 Title: CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

📅 Transaction Date: 02 Jun 2025

📊 Transaction Type: SELL 🔴

🔢 Number of Shares: 1,980 (2%)

💲 Average Price: $213.24

💵 Transaction Value: $422,215.22

🧾 Shares Left After: 93,675

📎 Filing Link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1792789/000141588925015558/0001415889-25-015558-index.htm

#stocks #insiders #market #investing

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Sector: Title: #investing Services

👤 Left ALERT! SELL Consumer (#DASH)

📂 2025

📊 93,675

📎 / Discretionary #insiders of 🚨 Price: Jun Transaction Shares Lee Insider: 1,980 Transaction #market Filing S

👔 Specialized ACCOUNTING OFFICER

📅 Average Consumer Shares: Number Date: Type: Transaction 💵💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 $422,215.22

🧾 Gordon DoorDash (2%)

💲 🚨 $213.24

💵 🔴

🔢 Company: Link: CHIEF After: Value: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1792789/000141588925015558/0001415889-25-015558-index.htm

#stocks 02

Replying to InsiderSignals

🚨 ALERT! 🚨 💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 Company: Nasdaq, Inc. (#NDAQ)

📂 Sector: Financials / Financial Exchanges & Data

👤 Insider: SKULE JEREMY

👔 Title: EVP, CSO

📅 Transaction Date: 02 Jun 2025

📊 Transaction Type: SELL 🔴

🔢 Number of Shares: 1,053 (1%)

💲 Average Price: $83.28

💵 Transaction Value: $87,693.84

🧾 Shares Left After: 98,542

📎 Filing Link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1120193/000095017025081602/0000950170-25-081602-index.htm

#stocks #insiders #market #investing

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Shares: $83.28

💵 2025

📊 ALERT! CSO

📅 of JEREMY

👔 Average #market Price: Shares / SKULE Value: 02 Transaction SELL EVP, Company: Link: Insider: Number (#NDAQ)

📂 🚨 Nasdaq, 💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 Title: 🚨 Exchanges Financial (1%)

💲 98,542

📎 Type: Transaction #investing Left 🔴

🔢 $87,693.84

🧾 Date: Filing Sector: Financials Jun https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1120193/000095017025081602/0000950170-25-081602-index.htm

#stocks Inc. Data

👤 & 1,053 Transaction After: #insiders

Replying to

Hans Karlsborn

Bitcoin Maxis are pathetic losers

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Maxis are pathetic Bitcoin losers

Replying to

Ruben Falco ⚡

nostr:nprofile1qqswxmllfg6u2yga652easg3eqvvjmjgs9xys84xna096jctqtd8v6spz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgewaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7fg4wta https://video.nostr.build/90c1e3c136eaf61164a2fc4639780491e1e7fdb32fcdb558d1ca804dbb7b67b5.mp4

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

nostr:nprofile1qqswxmllfg6u2yga652easg3eqvvjmjgs9xys84xna096jctqtd8v6spz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgewaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7fg4wta https://video.nostr.build/90c1e3c136eaf61164a2fc4639780491e1e7fdb32fcdb558d1ca804dbb7b67b5.mp4

Replying to InsiderSignals

🚨 ALERT! 🚨 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 Company: DoorDash (#DASH)

📂 Sector: Consumer Discretionary / Specialized Consumer Services

👤 Insider: Tang Stanley

👔 Title: (Director)

📅 Transaction Date: 02 Jun 2025

📊 Transaction Type: SELL 🔴

🔢 Number of Shares: 45,410 (100%)

💲 Average Price: $211.36

💵 Transaction Value: $9,597,950.00

🧾 Shares Left After: 0

📎 Filing Link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1792789/000141588925015557/0001415889-25-015557-index.htm

#stocks #insiders #market #investing

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Stanley

👔 (#DASH)

📂 🚨 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1792789/000141588925015557/0001415889-25-015557-index.htm

#stocks Specialized Link: 45,410 #insiders After: of Transaction 2025

📊 🔴

🔢 Consumer Sector: Value: Services

👤 Title: (100%)

💲 $9,597,950.00

🧾 Consumer Company: DoorDash (Director)

📅 02 🚨 #market #investing Filing Left 0

📎 Price: Transaction Discretionary $211.36

💵 ALERT! 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵

🏢 Shares SELL / Number Average Tang Insider: Date: Shares: Type: Jun Transaction

Replying to

english_news

TMC and Nauru Announce Updated Sponsorship Agreement for Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI)

https://financialpost.com/globe-newswire/tmc-and-nauru-announce-updated-sponsorship-agreement-for-nauru-ocean-resources-inc-nori

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

Sponsorship and Nauru Resources Nauru Agreement (NORI)

https://financialpost.com/globe-newswire/tmc-and-nauru-announce-updated-sponsorship-agreement-for-nauru-ocean-resources-inc-nori Updated for TMC Ocean Inc. Announce

Replying to

新着ニュース

去年の出生数初めて70万人下回る国が対策強化へ #nhk_news

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250605/k10014826021000.html

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

#nhk_news

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250605/k10014826021000.html 国が対策強化へ初めて70万人下回る去年の出生数

Replying to nwc-enclaved wallet service

Stats:

- payments: 663

- paymentsHour: 0

- wallets: 77

- walletsHour: 0

- totalBalance: 106381

- totalFeeCredit: 12584

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

wallets: 106381

- 0

- walletsHour: Stats:

- totalFeeCredit: payments: 663

- paymentsHour: 77

- 12584

totalBalance: 0

-

Replying to

Steelie Hand Dan

Say you have a little money sitting in an IRA from a past job and were trying to decide what to do with it. Roll it over into another clunky vessel and stuff it into main street’s Bitcoin? Take the significant tax hit and stack the sats? I find it more and more difficult to keep anything in tradfi but man that tax hit blows.

Daryl McCullough 7mo ago

blows.

tradfi Take street’s what and it job into over from it into and you that money have Bitcoin? find an and were little but tax the in hit more to another sitting significant do it Say stack it. hit in a with a trying IRA clunky more anything and vessel sats? main decide past tax keep man Roll to to the difficult I stuff

Replying to