"
"]If URIs were wrapped as a magnet 🧲 then additional mirrors could simply add to the URI array.
This would ensure copies share the same hash,
The bonus is clients could also act as mirrors in a swarming scenario with WebRTC
Just implemented nostr auth, that's the first step, publishing soon ™️
Lightning.video
Your signer might, but good luck using it without connection to the broader network.
For shit on the internet to work it needs to be online. This isn't a new revelation.
Shit on the internet doesn't work when it's offline. Use an online node.
All the stupidity in Lightning is downstream of mobile nodes.
Bolt12 is shitcoinery that simultaneously breaks the network.
There's no fork, soft or otherwise, other than a supply increase, that elimates the need for UTXOs to be shared at a certain scale.
The sharing of UTXOs is ultimately a political system, and a technical implementation can't fix human weakness. At best it shrinks the scale of such system.
That being the case, there's no reason to incur fork risk since the smallest scale shared UTXO is at the family level- where SQL is adequate.
on the second flight I finished writing the implementation (and modifications to NIP-46) to make the following possible:
1. Alice goes to App A (e.g. Coracle) -- she clicks "create account" and gets a NIP-05 "alice@somesite.com". She uses Coracle as she normally would.
2. Alice goes to App B (e.g. Primal) -- she clicks "login" and types in "alice@somesite.com". A popup comes up and asks Alice if she wants to authorize this application to access her account. In an advanced setting She can scope down what the application can do (e.g. only create short notes but don't change the profile data)
At no point is there any mention of nsec, npub, keys, NIP-07, nsecbunker. Nothing. It just works.
cc nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240
If the initializing bunker is malicious then the nip41 rotation can't be trusted either?
Also where is the popup? Does every app that enrolls new users also need a keyring interface?
This is an announcement of a future announcement.
Sure if you compile your own extension sure it takes the "them" out of the equation. Otherwise it's still custodial nostr.
Iirc they do provide backup via email auth? Opting in to that is fine but now the scope is your whole browser.
And then your still left needing a whole different method on your phone.
Feeding a nip07 scriptlet with nsecBunker signatures could be a trivial to self host answer.. putting it on the hit list.
The tradeoff though is that now the browser extension has access to your entire browser storage, and the nostr key which is irrevocable is technically theirs.
Something like nsecBunker but more protocolized should remedy this.
If you swap sats on Lightning for chain Bitcoin opportunistically with your local farmer, is your farmer an LSP?
Imagine being this fragile and asleep in 2023
https://Shenandoahbitcoin.club
Grassroots meetup.
Meetup organizer works on Fedimint.
Feel free to attend Saturday.
Had a telegram convo with Gary and it's refreshing to find someone willing to discuss this stuff in good faith.
1. Sure. This what crypto has been doing. Is crypto a CIA op too?
2. Agreed!
3. Correct again! https://gist.github.com/callebtc/ed5228d1d8cbaade0104db5d1cf63939
I assume nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg is an asset of the banks too for creating Cashu?
4. I know nothing of Bolt12 or Offers so can’t comment.
Crypto? Probably, sprinkle in Mossad, UFW, GCHQ, etc. (Fwiw tho I also think Bitcoin is an NSA white hat op)
Calle took HRF spook money so might just be a useful idiot.
The ECash libs already existed, not sure to what extent they've been improved. Cashu though does plenty of affinity scamming as a Bitcoin project, tsk tsk.
Pass, your last post didn't install any confidence.
As I said, ECash can be good for API tokens and I may use it for that... but not as a payment network affinity scamming as Bitcoin tech.
The stack can use any backing currency, you can spin up ECash from literally nothing.
Banks are a proxy for government.
Reserves as still trusted and political, there's no cryptographic certainty.
Offers are not reverse compatible, there's also no meaningful privacy enhancement with banking scale mints.