I can’t decide which of the two is more of a cunt.
The JRE episode with Mike Benz is a must listen if you’re still unfamiliar with his work. Worth sharing the ep with anyone you think would listen.
Quantum Computing is a shitcoin.
I’d get mercury poisoning from sashimi.
God be with Anthony Smith.
You could tell he wanted to eat the pain because it wasn’t sorrow.
Bigtime. Salaam.
No. This is the internet. If we were to meet, you could use your fists and I would not. I’d take your silly ass down, take mount or your back, and strangle you. Then just at the moment where I let go of the choke and allowed you to regain consciousness, I’d bitch slap you.
You’d thank me for not pummeling you while passed out, and we’d go our separate ways.
Allahu akbar
Goose down is my preferred medium of communication.
Bro I literally had to put my human shield down to type that comment. A little more respect, please.
If it’s a Brioni suit you’re probably still in good shape. If you bought the suit at the men’s wearhouse, I’m told the best way is to put the barrel directly into your mouth before firing.
What shooting-up an ambulance looks like:
https://video.nostr.build/fe6df79ee76ebcbaf1c6b45f49a501ae0f043f7e776032dfb78ea4f73059e714.mp4
War crimes are not crimes because they are cruel and brutal.
(All war is cruel and brutal.)
War crimes are crimes because they are, also, counterproductive for achieving normal State strategic goals.
Attacking undefended ambulances and hospitals, whether with guided missiles, 120mm HEAT, 40mm autocannon fire, or merely automatic rifles like this time, gains zero military advantage, but motivates the enemy to fight on against your side regardless of costs because you are clearly monsters.
This is why all the (mostly-evil) governments that signed the Geneva Conventions agreed not to do it. And don't. Unless they're already committing genocide and just want to impress their own people (and others) with their power.
Terrorists need medical attention just like anybody else, to see it prevented in this way breaks my heart.
Christmas list:
-Dior Eau Sauvage Parfum
-6 pair MeUndies boxer briefs
-North Face Canyonlands zip hoodie
What’s yours?
Give it to a specimen of that particular species of panhandler who’s physically and mentally fully capable but just lazy as fuck.
There’s a really popular dude on here whose every post is always some form of brag disguised as humility. And people eat it up.
You make great points, and maybe I don’t quite have a precise handle on my irritation with his saying that. My thought now is of the other party in nearly all of his economic transactions as a human. Sure he knows businesses/vendors and the like who accept bitcoin and try to contribute to the bitcoin circular economy, but largely, the world doesn’t exchange with him via his assets, it exchanges with him via dollars. It’s the dollars he lives on because it’s the dollars that the vast majority of other parties want in exchange for whatever good or service they provide him. Without dollars Jack is in rough shape. I guess I get very practical when I think about living on something. To live I need my next meal. If I want that next meal I need dollars to pay the store or the restaurant. I’m not going to the grocery store with an ounce of gold and demanding $2k worth of groceries. I don’t live on gold and I can’t in the modern world-at least not without great difficulty-. I live on dollars. Whatever personal economic activity or yield on a particular asset that provided the dollars that I “own” is almost irrelevant when it comes to my getting along in the world and satisfying whatever needs I have. Maybe I’m overly focused on the medium of exchange aspect of the expression, “living on” or “living off” any particular thing. I understand what you’re saying, but for me in the most practical sense, he’s living on dollars because it’s dollars that the other party wants.
Most importantly, and I think this is a good summation of where my head is at, but it’s only when the world wants his bitcoin in exchange for all of those goods and services it provides him, only then, imo, should he say that he’s living off or on Bitcoin. When he goes to the grocery store or restaurant and the only option they give him is to pay in bitcoin, then he should rightly say that he’s living on bitcoin.
I guess all I mean is that at rock bottom, his primary medium of exchange and a human living in 21st century America is the dollar
