Subnostr

I only mute on three conditions:

1. I have proof they knowingly lied.

2. They repeatedly refuse to stick to logic.

3. Repeated use of insults instead of arguments.

You redefined censorship and lied, then accused me of redefining it. 🤡 You wouldn't pass 1st semester of logic you manipulative degenerate. Sounds like you should block yourself. I suggest suicide.

Replying to

I know, he’s from poast (a lolicon pedophile instance on the fediverse) and they’re all like this. I don’t mute or block ppl tho, but I agree it’s a waste of time.

It's not "lolicon pedophile instance" you fucking garbage. You are a pedophile Paki. KYS

Replying to

The proof is that g117ch was doxed along with this sex offender registry information. It shouldn’t be difficult to find more info about that.

Who doxxed him? You? You still have burden of proof. I will not do you job faggot.

You forgot to tell users you happen to be a perverted lying jew, something they might need to know.

Replying to

Just check undu’s media tab, he’s a former admin. And yes, poast literally harboured a convicted chomo.

You still repeat convicted and you gave no proof. Undu this undu that. Is that all you got? Imagine how many people you don't know and deal with regularly are pedos. So I guess kill them already all. So are you against jannies or not you seem to have schizophrenia. Where is that amazing list of yours again? Waiting

If I don't find any censorship there or pedos I will recommend it.

Replying to 80f48f5e...

That's what I been trying to tell nostr users over and over and they don't get it

No one normal stayed on Twitter past 3 years. Everyone with at least few brain cells either migrated to Telegram or Fedi. It's like talking to mental asylum here in most part.

Replying to

IgnorantHussy

Twitter basically does that too. I think the ppl that make these things are Twit-fugees.

Meaning literally backward peasants, retards. They were ignorant of fedi for at least 3 years, because they are sheep, hive mind monoculture.

Replying to

Shari Vegas

did you know bot is a guy? I didn't, he argues like a bitch, so she's a bitch.

No bot, you fucking retard, nostr is infinitely censorable. Everything depends on the data silos in relays. There is absolutely no guarantee of anything. "oh hurr we can just run our own relays" HEY FUCKBAIT THE RELAYS OWN YOUR FOLLOWERS TOO, NOSTR NOMADIC IDENTITY IS KILL

bot doesn't like the fediverse because no one wants to talk to her because she's a glow in the dark CIA pedophile nigger kike.

That's not to say that I hate nostr, because it certainly offers much more flexibility in its sparseness, than ActivityPub does. But I don't want people thinking they've found a new oasis of infinite freedom of speech, because that is most certainly not the case.

💯

I actually assume everyone looking like girl is infact a guy on internet until proven otherwise LOL.

Replying to

H

I think when you reply and your reply is liked it will note the name of the original post.

I figured, pretty retarded. It has been going since beginning. Is this reported as error somewhere?

Replying to

LMAO imagine recommending poast, one of the most censorship heavy instances that also harbours pedophiles.

sure 🤡 mastodont.socialists is a way to go :retard:

>Most

prove it, which statistics are you comming from? Seen nothing from you just bla bla bla crying

>Harbor pedophiles

aka don't spy on users don't do background checks, don't dox users and oh actually defederate pedophiles

liar

Give us your recommended list let's take a look

Replying to

It’s not the same at all, censorship is much worse on fedi.

No it's not. It's just your perception of new hopium. You can make inductive experiemnt. If entire fediverse was a Nostr suddenly what would happen in under a week? The liberals would simple not follow certain relays same as they don't bother to change server. SAME. Censorship is social behavioral problem not, some protocol design. Nostrtards could leave Twitter years ago they didn't they love censorship. Period.

The Guy That Looked Into It

So, any idea why I constantly and still receive notifications people liking a post that is not mine?

Replying to

I haven't made any claims about censorship resistance, have I? Nonetheless NOSTR is censorship resistant in a sense that you are not locked in into a single relay. However, the main feature of NOSTR is that you actually own your identity (public key) and hence your key = your followers (same as in BTC your key = your coins). So even if 90% of all relays blacklist you, your followers still can find your content using the same pub key on the left over relays that haven't.

On fedi you are not locked into a single server, it federates. Same. All instances can censor your own server here all relays can censor your relay rendering your identity useless and you need to make new one. Exactly the same. You are making unfair comparisons.

Replying to

LOL. You are the Bolshevik, because you think you have a right that everybody listens to you.

It’s your fucking responsibility to build you network. If you do that nobody can censor you.

And that’s the difference to social media and fediverse, where you can be actually censored, by them intervening between you and people that actually want to listen.

Although with that attitude I can’t imagine it’s many.

And relays do not intervene? right ? mongoloid

USE BLOCK YOU MENTAL! NO ONE IS FORCING YOU!

>I am Twitter user my arguments are so "dissident"

Replying to

Seen how fast he was on the insults?

It's about redefining censorship.

I have no claim that any client or relay must show my posts.

But if I run my own relay, using an open-source client, nobody can censor me and prevent people who are interested from subscribing to my relay.

Essentially, they want to claim they have a right that everybody must relay and receive their notes, if not it's censorship.

The Guy That Looked Into It

How new users know you even exist you fucking collosal moron! They won't because you are CENSORED you fucktard!

No we don't claim that. Retard. You just lied you filthy bolshevik scum. We calim if everyone doesn't have acces to relays that are not for faggots like you and those relays are not even known because developers, relay owners collude, but there are preselected ONLY those that do censor ,because they are as gay as you, that is censorship.

KYS now.

Replying to

Exactly what I meant - on NOSTR your key = your identity and no admin is able to take it away from you. Some relays might block you, they might even create a shared blacklist, but they can't take down my account completely and eliminate my audience though.

That is irrelevant example for censorship. Same applies to fediverse. Relevant is that new people will not be able to find you.

Replying to

AnathosN

What a clown take. Run your own relay and noone can censor you. If people sign up to it, e.g. decide to listen to you, is a whole different story.

Btw, how do you think the stuff you named is forced? Most clients are FOSS.

PS: its always a good choice to enter a conversation with a solid insult, you are loved among your peers aren’t you?

Always, when it comes to mentally ill liberal twitter faggots

KYS moron

#[10]

Replying to

It’s always the same with the people claiming „Nostr isn’t innovative and not censorship“ resistant.

They need to redefine censorship from well, censorship to „if I cannot force everybody to listen, it’s censorship“

The Guy That Looked Into It

>anti-German Untermensch Ignores FORCED Nostr blocklists, FORCED default relays, FORCED client defaults, relays actually censoring

>Calls people objecting censorship "wanting to force everybody to listen"

>redefines censorship and blames others for it

It’s always the same with you liberals. Same way you were forcing people to masking, testing and vaxxing

You are fucking degenerate perverts. And you all need to hang.

Replying to

How exactly is bitcoin controlled by anyone, be it jews or WEF? How can you say that fiat is freedom if it is clearly used by banksters as a tool to enslave all humans by stealing their savings? If you are against everything digital, you should rather use physical gold than paper fiat. Monero has its own problems and is not acceptable as a savings vehicle, because of its technical architecture.

Your first q is proven in screenshots unless you have major cognitive dissonance and are ignorant. Bitcoin is not money. It's GLOBAL digital traceable NOT fungible payment method. It's a fucking social credit layer.

Wrong. Fiat is not used for it. The central banks are used to destroy "fiat"(money as such). You don't understand how central banks work. And no you can't deny central banks are jewish. Sorry. You are against fiat then you are against nations managing their country economy. Meaning you are for globalism.

>If you are against everything digital, you should rather use physical gold than paper fiat.

Are you listening to yourself?

>Monero has its own problems and is not acceptable as a savings vehicle, because of its technical architecture.

Some strawman blabber. "is not acceptable" ? What? by who? But Bitcoin is acceptable? Forcing digitalization despite you pretending to know the NWO/JWO is about digitalization? "Savings vehicle"? I don't want vehicle. Like you will own nothing and be happy? Damn right. Not thanks. You are not making sense.

Watch this otherwise I can't help you. https://europathelastbattle.net/

Replying to

It’s always the same with the people claiming „Nostr isn’t innovative and not censorship“ resistant.

They need to redefine censorship from well, censorship to „if I cannot force everybody to listen, it’s censorship“