cause we feel stupid using an economic rake to dig an orange pill hole.

wrong tool.

u don’t feel stupid when using a philosophical shovel

good news is freewill is an implicit formal property of being human.

can’t scrub it out, even if u would like to pretend its not there

they prey on the vulnerable

that’s the danger of modern relativistic thinking, when they sever the anchor to objective reality, they can’t see there is no winning the game.

yeah, went from a back injury could jog half a block to 1.5 inches away from the splits. mobility is amazing

like you said, we are bitcoin.

we tend the garden.

we are responsible for the fruit.

what happens when they open up Fort Knox and the gold isn’t there?

#asknostr

Perhaps the most important downstream societal effect of #Bitcoin is that people can properly invest in family and children.

Letting strangers raise the future for min wage was a dumb idea.

both can be true: we need more educators and more pain

#OrangePill the masses

a catastrophic cocktail

Philosophy is like soccer because anyone who can run around can play.

But unlike soccer, in philosophy many people think that because they can run around, that makes them Lionel Messi.

#asknosrt Why is that?

if anarchism only cries out about injustices carried out by states, then it’s a political version of Moms Agaist Drunk Driving.

is anarcism the idea that states should act better? or something more?

This book is an anthem.

A sledgehammer ringing the bell of sovereignty and human dignity.

So close, gotta keep grinding

#OrangePill the masses

#Bitcoin

#TheMoralCase

#Philosophy

#nostr

Separating money from state does not validate a stateless society.

If you care about logical consistency, you have to follow it where it goes.

Libertarian Anarco Capitalists are incredible at describing problems and critiquing systems.

But they fall off the Gnostic cliff when it comes to prescriptions.

#Natural Law

#Philosohpy

#Bitcoin

#nostr

the state = imposed non voluntary social relations

that’s its formal essence/definition the analogy conveys rhetorically.

the state = imposed non voluntary social relations

do u have any objection to that definition?

the state = imposed non voluntary social relations

that can never be scrubbed out of the human condition, be it a kind family or a tyrannical empire, the matter is accidental, but the form is immutable

“communities formed voluntarily by people”

how did u voluntarily consent to your parents creating you?

we don’t get to just start our philosophical analysis of what it means to be a human being when u are 18.

i undoubtedly agree with every critique you have against the state we have today.

but to say we can abolish “the state” categorically is non-rational. it’s absurd.

the first principles of the state are the same principles of parents.

to think a human beings can exist without “the state” is the exact same as thinking children can exist without parents.

just unpack the entailments and verify

whatever principles or rules u want to govern society, if their scope doesn’t account for the origin or the beginning, then it’s not addresssing reality, it’s just a speculative fantasy. it’s gnostic

and i think you are going to love my book. power bombing this abominable monetary system down to metaphysical bedrock

the draft is almost ready

i’m with u up until the logical contradictions of anarcy.

there is no logically valid justification for primacy of the individual.

to prove me wrong, show me a person who beget themselves, and i’ll come to ur side.

until then, “the state” is the natural and implicit hierarchy embedded in humanity.

i know that’s not a fun as being an anarcist, but following logical consistency rarely is pleasant.