Avatar
BTCymphony
38c488a2a4716f9f2bab77769d2fdf4b32cc5a6276c31bb2ea58313ce41dc466
We are the notes in a movement. The cadence is in danger, the resolve set upon by thieves. But the Song remains the same, we sing for Freedom!

If you listen for 10 episodes and it makes you want to listen more/faster/stronger/longer than you are probably a freak. If you listen to the entire 21 days of all episodes than you are DEFINITELY a freak lol (just ask Carlos). Ride or Die is a bit different isn’t it? Like who knows who will capitulate when? And what does capitulate mean?…

Where is Tina?!

You should put a typo in that meme😂

Find blindspots and alchemize them into roots of power. Points of inner conflict become weightless from changed perspective.

A sensei once said: “the bad news is he has a knife but the good news is I am about to.”

What’s your Log Line?

Don’t trust verify…he seems the exception that proves the rule but we shall see…many such cases

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

Military Industrial Complex.

Replying to Avatar FranciaWrites

If I had guaranteed success, it would be because I have different companies that help as many people as possible. I would measure success by every extra person who can grow and flourish from the path that my businesses can open. Having success is incredible, but if that success opens doors to other people, any effort makes sense.

Waking up today with $5000 to invest, I have two different scenarios:

First option

I have been perfecting my recipe for aromatic candles for a while, and I am always asked to sell them, so I see a lot of potential. So I would invest $800 in materials, $1000 for brand registration, $1800 for a store in a good location in my city, and $1500 to make the furniture myself with my dad. And so I would start selling these candles that I am always asked for.

Second option

I like to diversify my income, which is why I have several businesses that are still very small, but I know they will continue to grow slowly and in which the public is very different. So what I would do would be to divide and conquer.

PelucasVe is my wig business and the first one that made money, so I would invest $2000 to set up a studio to put on wigs for my clients and provide hairdressing, cutting, and maintenance services.

MenosDiez is a catalog where I offer home products all for less than $10. So I would invest $1200 in more products and improve purchase prices.

Respira e inspira is the candle project. I would register the brand with $1000 and buy the materials to start selling online with $800.

I have been starting these businesses at home with very little investment, two of them already produce money, and I have a few more in mind for later, so investment is always a springboard but not something strictly necessary. It is very possible to start from scratch, it just takes a lot of patience and perseverance.💛

Thank you always for reading and for being here🔆

#nostr #dream #bussines #blog #writing #plebs #plebchain

Being able to run the businesses from your home seems a good option. I like the wig idea but I don’t know how many you have to sell to pay the rent etc. I guess all I am saying is it puts a time pressure on a young business that can be stressful. We got a shop for my production company a year ago and it has been amazing to work out of but it’s a lot of money to come up with every 30 days…

Middle class isn’t priced out, it’s just getting very hard to stack. Isn’t it all about protecting savings? Any dollar traded for sats is a step towards that goal.

Replying to Avatar asyncmind

Bitcoin is not compatible with the corporate charter any company adopting bitcoin will not be a company by definition

Exactly — and that’s the paradox at the heart of “Bitcoin Treasury Strategy.”

What the post gets right is this:

Bitcoin is the hurdle rate — if you’re not outperforming Bitcoin, you’re better off just holding it.

Counterparty risk is real — ETFs and corporate stocks are not substitutes for sats.

But what it misses entirely — and what your statement nails — is the fundamental incompatibility between:

> 📜 The corporate charter (a legal fiction for maximizing shareholder value through fiat games)

vs.

> ₿ Bitcoin’s core ethos (a sovereign monetary asset that eliminates trusted intermediaries)

Here’s why a company holding Bitcoin is not a company in the traditional sense:

---

🧨 1. Corporate custody breaks trust minimization

Companies are subject to seizure, regulation, confiscation, and mismanagement. That violates the first principle of Bitcoin: don’t trust, verify.

---

🧨 2. Fiduciary duty becomes incompatible

Directors are bound to fiat benchmarks. If Bitcoin drops, fiduciaries are pressured to sell. But Bitcoiners hodl through cycles. This clashes violently with corporate mandates.

---

🧨 3. Bitcoin dissolves the need for the company

A company exists to coordinate capital and labor. But with Bitcoin + Lightning + open-source + distributed teams, you don’t need the middleman anymore.

---

🧨 4. Regulation forces fiat compliance

Bitcoin is censorship-resistant. Companies are not. The second they hold BTC, they must surveil, report, expose keys to audit trails — defeating the purpose of self-sovereignty.

---

🧨 5. Bitcoin makes the corporate form obsolete

The real signal is this: Bitcoin enables post-corporate, trustless, global coordination. The era of "Bitcoin companies" will end when everyone realizes:

> “Why route my wealth through a fragile meatspace corporation when I can verify, custody, and coordinate directly?”

---

So yeah. Any company that truly “gets” Bitcoin… eventually ceases to be a company.

It becomes a protocol, a network, or a pseudonymous working group.

Or it dies trying to stay a firm while holding fire.

Let that sink in.

#Bitcoin #BitcoinTreasuryScam

Wow. Probably my favorite of your quotes. Absolute Banger.

Well I will be there for dinner, did you say 6:30?

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Rest In peace!

An escalator can never be broken, it can only become stairs…