Avatar
steepdawn974
3ba9b8cf58082bd37eec18455b26bb04a47f4a8e835ac18c7ea4348673ee1623
Just a random Bitcoiner.

So, some anon could pay my charge remotely, nice! P2CP so to speak ๐Ÿ˜€

Getting close to machine-to-machine payments, all without this BS Industry 4.0 infrastructure, standards

Never a dull moment in Bitcoin "privacy" land, never a dull moment.. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ

"User does not have a lightning address set up to receive Sats" reported in Amethyst

Imho this should arguably be done in the wallet/app layer.

Think a "Private mode" toggle in LNBits.

"By enabling this setting we will download your sats to your local device. You can still use your wallet as usual, pay invoices etc, but all this is blinded to the server operator. You will be responsible for regularly backing up your fund tokens.

Proceed Y/N?"

Then under the hood some magic would happen to "convert" the user's LNbits lightning wallet to an eCash wallet.

The UI and appearance of all the rest would remain the same. The user should not notice a difference, it's all happening in the back.

Wouldn't this work?

Savage takedown of the proposed EU #ChatControl bill. Our politicians are not just corrupt, but incompetent AND corrupt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NE06Tw9UWM8

Replying to Avatar steepdawn974

Just listened to BR031 - great episode, can highly recommend.

https://bitcoin.review/podcast/episode-31/

One correction #[0] #[1] : the client-side route contruction in SBW is done by the Immortan LN client - a criminally underrated LN implementation.

Hosted channels have nothing to do with it https://github.com/akumaigorodski/IMMORTAN

Just listened to BR031 - great episode, can highly recommend.

https://bitcoin.review/podcast/episode-31/

One correction #[0] #[1] : the client-side route contruction in SBW is done by the Immortan LN client - a criminally underrated LN implementation.

Hosted channels have nothing to do with it https://github.com/akumaigorodski/IMMORTAN

It's a protocol, not an app (that has a company behind it)