yeah, I used monero some time ago when lightning payments failures was still common (and, in particular, I didnt know how lightning worked). Today the privacy themed shitcoin is totally pointless, lightning offer a full-chain of solutions to move pretty any amount of bitcoin (in small tranches) and it cost less than shitcoining (tx fees to return to bitcoin is obligated cause to gigantic devaluation of the monaros).
new good stuffs most likely emerges from an environment of free weirdos freely trying and failing, not from aseptic elite high-culture environment.
Great scientists was brokehead devoted weirdos, curious and indipendent, not like the burocrats-scientists that today do academic "research" .
If you understand and admire science, you cant be an academic-scientist, you want to be a weirdo brokehead (at least at the mainstream eyes of bureacracy).
sorry, I dont understand another concept: the feeds like "lastest" and "lastest with replies" are not computed by a relay, true? They are pulled by the client from the multiple relays we connect (or using in/outbox model...).
So these dvm feeds can run on either relays or devices(?)
Or these feeds I mentioned are not dvms feeds(?)
Thanks!
yeah agree, I was not polemic, I really didnt understand, thanks 😁🙏
I dont understand, whats the economic behind "paid feeds" like the one from nostr:npub1sx9rnd03vs34lp39fvfv5krwlnxpl90f3dzuk8y3cuwutk2gdhdqjz6g8m in the new primal 2.0?
Who pays who for this feeds and whats the service offered?
agree with you and there is absolutely great value on releasing all backends (and shame for who keep it close). Still the drama about "users trust" is nonsense.
frankly dont know about backends codebases. Its super important to open source all and would be great to have responses about that.
Still, backend involves trust in who runs it and offer the services, opening the source doesnt make much difference in reducing the trust that users need to put as theres no way to audit the computation happening in the backed.
this is false, they are modern and auditable codebases, and the commits well organized and self-explicable.
All is open, accessible and understandable for everyone.
The point is that they follow a not so common dev practicing that could let new people on codebase a bit disoriented, but it doesnt impact the possibility of read the code and audit it by any means.
Every codebase is different as it could fulfill different porpouses, so this drama is totally nonsense.
still I think the first also was a solution, maybe find a pattern the dev hasnt figure out... or I 'm just wrong did bad counting
this is the only end for fiat money game theoretically, hyperaccelerated inflation until totally devaluated. Every actor that has fiat and has possibility to print/borrow fiat is incentivized to do that, and buy the scarcest asset to preserve and gain wealth. And is inevitable, cause every economic actor that choose to not do this will just disappear ggettin rekt. In sp500 wouldnt do that, microstrategy-like companies will do that and will become the new sp500.
Its inevitable, the only thing I cant frankly figure out is how much time it will need and how fast these processes happens
why this is not a solution grrrrrr
yeah, so masochist but soooo rewardful when things works... thats the solution, been 45 minutes on that
it seems this is not a solution wtf😓
