yeah, but mstr could add volatility up and down, and someone would bet on "the Saylor strategy" and the active value it can add. Its still fiat money, I'd keep in fiat only what I'm not afraid to loose, just in the cases mentioned earlier.

not necessarly, buyng mstr stock INSTEAD of bitcoin (in self custody and privacy) is retarded. Some people could have to maintain some fiat-denominated-credit exposure for various reason, for continue to keep a large business active fro example, or to not result a "total tax avoider".

So fiat credit denominated in bitcoin or microstrategy stocks could be better that fiat credit denominated in fiat money.

Still, I consider totally nonsense having more than a 10% of your stack in fiat. If your business require you to keep fiat and pay taxes, its time to kill your business and stack bitcoin.

Yeah 😂, I think the way amethyst does it is good, a sort of replace-with-the-new-note

whatsapp is full proprietary code, so its not on fdroid.

I meant "walled garden"

they are no more based on xmpp and diverged from long time. But, basically, the reason I use them is network effect. Othere people use it, so I use it to communicate with them.

Frankly I hate signal cause is a "just slightly better wallet garden" but noone uses it. So is another shitty app on my phone to talk to two guys, I hate it more than whatsapp that at least permit me to do backdoored communications with all my contacts.

signal is a shit like whatsapp but foss, and without an effective business model.

What can be wrong?

nah ok I'm a bit exxagerating. Still I dont like many of his take on a lot of things and my retardometer ringed a lot

my retardedometer worked even this time, I didnt read a single good take from he.

bitcoin is still in a deep dippin from 2009, wheres my sats/usd parity 😤

yeah I also saw it it the same years, it was also for me a "first experience with controversial stuffs"! I was shocked and amazed at the time, I didnt know bitcoin and a lot of things at the time. Now dont remembe exactly what the doc was about, remember just a "generic cospiracy theory about new global scientocratic order" sort of, but at the time clicked something in me!

I'm not, but seems a good solution

this sound fine, but a more ambitious goal would be build a bitcoin revenue stream so to avoid taxation and goverment abuse on spending. I think in some years would be reasonably possible for most people, we will see.

ct seems to me something a bit difficult to obtain trought soft fork, how can a legacy client is supposed to react to a redacted amount?

I think CISA could be more interesting as a base to make every spend a coinjoin and create incentive to mix everyone you can, disrupting eurisptics

mmmm maybe nostr:npub1cvqlzvmjercdn0ypsmv8f7j9lge6ahsnueh5rparh53wuswftv4q49yjt3 or nostr:npub1casacasahesdrpu6npfth2t0ae37a2cdwwg3c4fkt30v7gzffx3q7wtzdc ?

The lord of the rings is a perfect representation of the state.

Mordor (the state/the idea of statism) controls people and brings out the worst in everyone, tempting them with the ring.

Also, his army of creatures without an individuality, an ethic and without humanity in general is a perfect represantation of how people "infected with the statism" become and the kind of enemies we, free individuals, are called to fight.

nostr:note1ct620wws8ctfry2p0r69cw0uqaq9r724z2gz34s5g7evhgstzqgqsz7r9x

agree, the money printer is like the ring, and the state is mordor. We have the occasion to destroy the printer, and everyone near it has the temptation to keep it working to print money to himself.

Its important to destroy it, it will not end injustice, wars and mafias but will make them costly for actors that want do that. And incentives, at this point, make wars unsostainable, and mafias better (cause to competition and limited resources).

these feature would be a great marketing for monero... if only digital scarcity could be preserved when arbitrary printing shitcoin, and if it could not trending to zero agsinst bitcoin (that is also more private if used well due to network effect and plausable deniabilty)...

maybe I can be against some mafias, so could not want actively onboard them 😅. Still bitcoin is neutral and should be optimized for black market and criminals, and so for mafia. When they will realize theres a tool for them, we will have them in. If they do something really bad and hamring to us, we will need to fight in other ways instead of expecting that the state censors them.

Also the state is always the first investor for mafias.

I'm so aligned with nostr:npub1au23c73cpaq2whtazjf6cdrmvam6nkd4lg928nwmgl78374kn29sq9t53j views about a lot of aspects of bitcoin.

I think that money laundering is beautiful, that the most important feature of bitcoin is to effectively do money laundering (separating money from state IS doing money laundering) and I think that bitcoin is useful for criminals and who dont care to be marked as "criminal" from some randome lawmaker.

I'm also surprised of how much larping and statism there is in the bitcoin community, even in some OG.

I dont understand why you think bitcoin is cool if you think that bitcoin shouldnt be used by criminals or should only "partially" permit money laundering and so on.

Defund the state is not extremism, condoning is blatant larping statism.

If bitcoin would be useful only for some criminals, the good one, bitcoin would be absolutely a useless bullshit.