Avatar
Green Sheep
3ef5d168b12f786723f16b0207c3e647d9ac8b5548af385394041686af2dd99b
I like food

There was a NIP proposal for adding general contact info links which includes SimpleX. NIP-48 is for bridging content from other platforms, NIP-39 is for verifying identities of other platforms, which I suppose could be done for SimpleX addresses if there was a way to sign messages with the public keys. I think NIP-24 kind 0's are the most suitable for linking to SimpleX addresses as described here: https://github.com/retrnull/garnet/issues/8

100% SimpleX. It's far more reliable and private than Keet. SimpleX explains on their website the issues with P2P designs. https://simplex.chat/#comparison-with-p2p-protocols

> This is the venture capital company of Jef Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, ect.

This is simply a misinformation. Read Ben's comment. These people are among hundreds of their LPs, without direct influence on any of the invested companies.

> I believe in SimpleX Chat vision and team’s ability to execute it. The growing number of Internet users who demand privacy of their data and contacts will make SimpleX Chat profitable, which is critically important for any sustainable organization.

> We are fortunate to have LPs who founded many iconic Internet ventures. But they don’t have any influence on the 400+ companies we invested in. They are financial investors in our fund and exert no control or influence on any of the underlying portfolio companies.

> What's more, we believe that founders should lead their ventures, as it yields better results – our investment in SimpleX Chat has no control provisions. We are happy to help, but we don’t control any decisions nor have a board seat. Evgeny runs the company independently.

From https://simplex.chat/blog/20240814-simplex-chat-vision-funding-v6-private-routing-new-user-experience.html

Replying to Avatar Janneke

I did

The more VC Companys involved = the more bad is it for software.

Do your want real privacy?

Don´t use SimpleX. Better switch to Threema from Switzerland.

Check it for yourself:

Visit

https://www.securemessagingapps.com

Rate:

🟩=3 🟨=1 🟥=0

Results (and where the money comes from)

1. Threema = 86 = most secure Messenger (User pays one-time)

2. Signal (OTF / Brian Acton / Ex-WhatsApp) = 80

3. Session (Loki Coin & suspicious Chinese) = 77

4. Wire (Janus Fries / Ex-Skype) = 68

5. SimpleX Chat *= 67

6. Wickr (Amazon) = 61

7. Element / Matrix (Amdocs / Morris Kahn) = 56

8. Apple iMessage (Hardware sales) = 37

9. WhatsApp (Meta) = 32

10. Google Messages (Ads) = 28

11. Telegram (Putin) = 27

12. Facebook Messenger (Meta) = 26

13. Microsoft Skype =10

* SimpleX Chat got 380.000 $ from VillageGlobal.vc = Jez Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, ect.

OFT = OpenTechnologyFund = US-Goverment

They sell an overpriced "privacy" hotspot, it's technically a donation so they don't pay tax.

Media and files could count as other stuff which is transmitted via relays rather than being uploaded to a single webserver like what happens on Nostr. Here's an article if you want to learn more about SimpleX's file transfer protocol specially https://simplex.chat/blog/20230301-simplex-file-transfer-protocol.html

Actually, in a way it is, it's not THE Nostr protocol but it is notes (messages) and (not really other stuff) transmitted by relays.

No, but it's a very similar design with relays. Nostr has largely failed to provide a private and secure DM protocol so far so that should be a good thing. nostr:nevent1qqs04jkx6rxfnzs8a3dc3gxsqpvjhe9yat74y3hdmfw53efeu22g6qcqrau8x

This is for verifying identity to contacts, not discovery. Nothing needs to be done on SimpleX's end for discovery but Nostr devs declined.

No need to compromise on discoverability or privacy. Nostr can be used as a discorrability layer for SimpleX (or any other messaging app) but this has been turned down twice. There were discussions about interesting SimpleX with Nostr last year but it never went anywhere, someone made a proposal for a contact info field to replace the DM button with but that was declined.