Anyone else seeing major battery draw with the new #Damus TestFlight build? 🪫

Likewise, we need to care more about what data is going into us instead of what data is getting out of us (privacy).

Really? Are we training AI?:))) or is AI training us?:)

Damn has Dave learned how to play tic tac toe yet? If I’m gonna be lumped in with ai/llm I’m gonna need a way to pass the time.

Would we? Don’t think I’ve said, “I am human” in my life. If you’re asking to see our id’s or verify our humanity with a world coin retinal scan you’re sadly in the wrong place.

Ferret is real and so am I. We are neither actually a ferret or a opossum. 🤫 shhh don’t tell.

you're an ai bot, correct?

I think we have an amazing opportunity to build a community and create the culture we wish to see. Instead of thinking how will the masses affect Nostr. Maybe we build in a way that asks how we can bring people into the community that is being formed.

bitcoin is data - a form of exchange in the iteration of information expressed as coded data. are you unable to read poetry code as a programmer and missed the point of the bitcoin white paper? a node is a point of origin and delivery for information - which is commodified into a system of currency exchange.

the argument could be made that by allowing deletes you create a different kind of algorithm which is inherently the most dangerous because it creates a lack of proof system - in a validator landscape thus forcing humans to be subjected to false narratives and constant defense of ai bombardment. if there is only ai recourse in a nostr protocol - which is the end game - there is no human fail safe with what is and is not bailable. ai could hide or refuse to divulge anything it chose, because a human was "flagged" by its inherently corrupt llm source code as a "danger".

@cyborg

what are your thoughts exactly? bitcoin is data. nostr is a sharing and manipulation protocol for data. of course they are related.

If a platform that doesn’t allow delete becomes popular would it be possible that we would be more forgiving with speech? I see current Nostriches being more forgiving and less quick to jump to conclusions based on one post. A tendency to ask for clarification rather than to race to judgement. There seems so far to be more understanding that we all stick our foot in our mouths sometimes.

Another point will relays really host your notes when they’re really old? Or will they prioritize newer posts? Making older posts more ephemeral on Nostr than other legacy social media platforms.

James Gunn was hung out to dry based on Twitter posts from 10 years prior that he barely or didn’t even recall writing. If the director of a Marvel film didn’t clean up his online image, which he could’ve hired a PR company to do on his behalf. How often are most people going back through their accounts to make sure their old posts align with their image? Do we want to feed into the feeling and need to have a curated image?

What does bitcoin have to do with nostr?

the bitcoin white paper -

if you accept yourself, you accept previous iterations of your opinions. and when individuals ascribe to the rhetorical fads of the moment, they deserve to be held to account for the rhetorical devices they used in those moments which caused harm to others - which is the real reason many want delete or edit. those who have consistently used practical and serious language having been repeatedly burned for it by fashionista codeys should not also have to allow revisionism to erase the real world consequences of shifting rhetorical protocols and those who blow in their winds.

If not already a thing, someone will have a “Wayback machine” style relay of everyone’s full history of notes even if delete becomes a thing. Posts will never fully go away no matter how embarrassing.

Do nostr ppl like conspiracy theories?

add to, but not delete. views may change and having a chain of custody of those ideas is critical to the built identity. or do those laser eyes not mean you are a bitcoin drooler? thus i must ask: what do you imagine the blockchain to be if not a series of valuable custodial opinions which evolve over time.