I can't verify the authenticity of this vendor on dread. there was an older website without the dash in the URL that got btfo and the fact that this new one advertises taking paypal is an extremely bad red flag. it's probably fake.
south korea also banned litecoin, just because of mweb. any exchange that bans monero will eventually refuse bitcoin deposits that appear to have originated from a privacy appliance
Zebec creates debit cards that can be reloaded with Zano for fiat transactions. These cards can be spent anywhere that accepts MasterCard.
I'm mixed on the idea because the payment processors still win in the end and you are enabling the State by using white markets, but I do think it's a pretty neat idea that should be used as more of a last resort when it comes to spending in said markets.
What do you think?
Source: @chrome2279, X
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1957629108642336772/vid/avc1/1080x1620/-UYZeWoFaCh-kr_s.mp4
#Agorism #Libertarian #Antistate #CounterEconomics #CircularEconomy #Zebec #Zano #Fiat $ZANO #Privacy #Video #Videostr
it's impossible to interface a cryptocurrency with the debit card network in a trustless/permissionless way
statechains generally allow asynchronous payments, yes. this is part of the point of why spark and ark tend to have better UX than self-custody lightning
you put it there so other people can watch it
it was stuck in your peen? mine got stuck closer to my kidney
japan has too many coomers. south korea on the other hand is already cooked
the filter was always wrong in the first place. it was always able to be bypassed. every consensus valid transaction should get confirmed. if you hate inscriptions so much, make them invalid in consensus.
you shouldn't use either one
was it luke who tried calling the australian police on someone who ran a bitcoin xt node, or was that some other core fruitcake? it's hard for me to remember. there were too many stupid things
you are ignoring parts of the mempool to your own detriment that are just going to get propagated and confirmed by people who don't have a mental disability https://video.nostr.build/ef064c7537936b458d4ae7307f0f0a169de7e333c9003195200d69ec9e135a84.mp4
it took 20 minutes to download the 745 MB file
it's actually one of the things that works reasonably well. just gotta be a little patient. I can hit about 1 M/s
I put a static blog on both. i2p is slower. there are some flash elements with ruffle and they take minutes to load on i2p. completely unusable. then I tried putting peertube on both. on i2p it could not load even the tiniest videos in an acceptable time. idk why people seem to have a good time with torrenting on i2p. if they can make that work it makes me wonder what kind of tuning I need to perform in my apps.
>Mempools have always been more strict than consensus
I'm aware
>nodes set the rules for the network
nodes that find blocks set the rules
>Miners deciding to break the rules set by nodes and route around them is a miner centralization issue
you're retarded
this is worse than gore
core should exactly mirror network consensus. anything else is irrational. there is absolutely nothing core is doing that is against the rules of the network. if you don't like the "spam" transactions then convince miners to fork. in the meantime your mempool filters are about as helpful as homeopathy.
nobody actually thinks that knots retardation will stop "spam" outside of people who still run knots. the network is censorship-resistant. sybil attacks won't work
I think everyone in the primal sidebar should die
bitcoin maxis were asleep at the wheel during the samourai wallet trial. and they still haven't lifted a finger about 1099-DA and nearly impossible to comply with taxation reporting requirements. and they are constantly showering custodial wallet developers with praise. they don't care about anything.
you have the right idea. sending ecash tokens offline does not prevent double spending. it's just as unsafe as getting a bad paper check.
any time it looks like there is a hole in ecash where you are not safe or something bad could happen to you, just assume that hole is real. ecash is basically an overhyped toy that requires too much trust.
I have a really crappy audiobook of camp of the saints recorded by alex linder
yeah, tBTC is technically using a federated peg. the threshold marketing materials bury this unfortunate reality underneath a lot of flashy language, and it seems the CL marketing materials are doing the same thing. if CL gives you more privacy that's nice and all, but you're still playing with something that's not any more secure than junk like liquid.
>you can just do things
this is another maxi lie. you couldn't have lightning without asking other people to activate segwit first.
you know what turns it into a truth? altcoins and custodial trash. you can just do things with altcoins and custodial trash.
don't like that? activate some more opcodes then.
almost all the stuff on nostr is just masturbatory horseshit and extremely repetitive conversation. the only people who seem to notice are the small number of users who aren't completely obsessed with bitcoin. your diagram reeks of lack of self-awareness
>Tradeoffs are fine if you are free to choose them
lmao. you don't have scalable self-custody yet. custodial wallets are optional only when the network activity is under capacity. you're framing it like a perfectly innocent option when it's really not.
