Avatar
brah
46761647d6adb9b5820605838416f845999704602c04b048b4cf7cdaeae4012f
Talking shit

Was taproot a scam? Or a mistake by devs? Or is this the behavior we wanted with taproot? nostr:note18ykalk7ykpgjd3pt49nrf6qrzjrs8nall5stnl7g3t9tp58p8sjqtstj6h

Why would it be there?

Just generating a key wonโ€™t make it available on all relays everywhere.

Posting a kind 0 (user meta data) to a relay will make it available *somewhere* and maybe that relay will pass it along to other relays

Well it may be expensive to use the base chain but the high fees are paying to secure the network (not saying I like ordinals just saying in general)

More likely โ€œaiโ€ responds to questions and gives answers if itโ€™s allowed to be politically correct from the Marxist whitelist of topics

Is #[2]โ€‹ going to orange pill several companies this week at just conference? Yes he is

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Prediction: AI is going to be a revolutionary *interface* to the ocean of software and tools we already use (including those that build more software and tools) that will unlock vast amounts of application function that is simply lost due to illiteracy and a far too vast information space.

Check out how Microsoft Copilot works: AI is more akin to the revolution in computer interfacing that the mouse and keyboard were, or that multi-touch was for the smartphone revolution, than it is a standalone app with some new specific functionality. It will end up being a computer (or internet) wide, contextually relevant knowledge base for how to use any and all of the tools available to you, as if it's all just a single, universal UI system to accomplish whatever you need at any moment.

AI will be able to use ALL of our apps, better than you we for most of them because it doesn't have to "learn" them. To the point that we might not need to bother to ever know how to use many apps, programs, CLI tools, or functions on our computers, because if the AI knows how to accomplish what we are looking for by using them, why bother?

Think about it like a calculator: Why learn how to manually do long division when it's just the "divide" button on one of numerous devices always within reach? Or having a physical map: why remember directions when you have a live map with traffic updates at all times in your pocket. One that speaks directions out loud?

This same relationship is about to apply to basically any or all software on your computer. It can integrate with web requests, run conversions, knows all the commands in your command line by heart and which ones will help in your current task, it will predict what you might need next, it can accomplish short, simple tasks that you might have needed an app or extension to accomplish before, but now AI can create a script or executable on the fly, specific to the exact situation & instance in which you need the functionality... so then why save it? The AI can just write and execute new code next time, that is specific to the next situation.

I bet that in just a few short years, interacting with a computer *without* an interfacing AI will feel like trying to sprint in knee deep water. This is going to put a 2x-4x growth trend every year in user speed and capacity to accomplish their goals **on top** of Moore's law's already exponential increase in *computing* power.

AI will create an exponential growth of *user* power on top of the already exponential growth in *computational* power.

AI is garbage lol

Donโ€™t need it

Donโ€™t want it

Nost your keys

Nost your coins

Replying to b7908ce0...

Trying to update the following list but must be posting the wrong kind