Avatar
Leo Wandersleb
46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d
https://walletscrutiny.com https://nostr.info Working on Bitcoin, Nostr and being a good dad.

OpenDimes are without any way of redundancy. By design you can't have a backup.

This amount is too little to hold in more than one UTXO. I think that's the point of the question.

The owners come to their AirBnB and let their clients guess around before sharing what's up.

The father who talks about all kind of stuff while his son is severely ill on the back seat. Whatever can cause such symptoms probably would kill the kid within two days, yet daddy is kind of not all too excited.

The prepper gets all confrontational instead of proudly helping with advice at least. Preppers know they can't defend their stash all alone running out on their porch with a gun more than once, yet this confrontation is then presented as an example of citizens turning on each other.

The kids immediately forget the incident on the beach. Kids would be all excited about something like this and tell at least each other again and again what was going on. They would be excited about stuff they had to leave on the beach or something.

There were so many instances where I just thought this was wrong. Father not offering a ride to wherever he was going to the woman in the field ... she would probably have known where he was. Oh, this father was pathetic in every possible way.

Replying to Avatar OrangeSurf

Miners determine which of the valid transactions in their mempool are selected for inclusion in a block.

Aside from the need for transactions to be valid, there are no consensus rules around transaction selection, miners are able to use whatever selection method they wish.

So how do block templates compare? Let's examine what happened prior to block 821498 (mined within the last hour).

The block mined by Antpool had a max total bid of 7.73789496 BTC. You can find this using bitcoin-cli getblockstats

My local instance of bitcoin core running the default policy rules + FullRBF had a max total bid of 7.71806816 BTC, lower than the mined block by 0.01982680 BTC.

The block templates provided by nostr:npub18d4r6wanxkyrdfjdrjqzj2ukua5cas669ew2g5w7lf4a8te7awzqey6lt3

had a max total bid of 7.7334687 BTC, lower than the mined block by 0.00442626 BTC.

The block template provided by ocean npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze

had a max total bid of 6.6127135 BTC, lower than the mined block by 0.43183364 BTC

Filtering policy and sorting method vary by pool, but mining is highly competitive. For how long can mining pools who do not maximise fee revenue survive?

The rate of my data logging (every few seconds) means it's inevitable that I don't capture the latest templates, so that accounts for a small part of the delta. You can see on the mempool block audit page that the expected mempool space template for the mempool block is 7.737 BTC , slightly higher than the 7.7335 BTC template I captured.

An additional source of the delta is that there were some transactions (in blue) which AntPool included which were not in

@mempool

's mempool and likely not in mine or oceans (I didn't save the block template so can't check).

These 6 transactions pay a total of 4,072,619 sats in fees. Plus there is a transaction that was included which had a marginal fee rate, paying a 73,828 sats.

A total of 4,146,447 sats

To create space to include these transactions 45 transactions were dropped, each paying 89,833 sats.

A total of 4,042,485 sats

Including these transactions resulted in a net increase for the in band fees of 103,962 sats (0.00103962 BTC)

Check the block audit at https://mempool.space/block/000000000000000000028bdf4456e7e2519b0ba4b6d52cea0cc18c726f60a578

Uhm, 7.73789496 - 6.6127135 is at least 1.1 BTC that OCEAN would have left on the table, right?

Probably still somewhere between Lyttelton and Diamond harbor, Christchurch. ;)

nevent1qqsgndvuz4zhkn2t5uhvc4ga6lp20t2kmha650dfxv6k84cejv45edgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqzypr0e03svh40rtncz9r9jf8y3y3nv0ln75nt6mmn6lqcfvttmr8y6qcyqqqqqqgva7z6r

I am not sure, but is it nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze with their filter doing the good here and confirming blocks with lower fees once every hour or so? #asknostr 🐶🐾🫡

It's an illusion to think that a miner that mines cheap transactions is doing anything good. By doing this, he has to not mine some transactions with higher fees, do it at a personal loss making it harder for everybody to figure out how to get transactions mined.

When suddenly getting surprised by these fees, things can get dicey. There's a sudden urgency to convince your counterparts to either pay the transaction fees or switch to lightning. I can open big channels but to make a $30 fee worth it, it has to be a really big channel.

You can pump the heat into the ground water or something. It still would have to dissipate somewhere. So if that ground water feeds into some river 5 days downstream, it would show up there. Maybe not after 5 days as it seeps through huge amounts of ground rock but weeks later or so ... you would have a signature if you had the prior temperature.

As long as these mints are used in tightly knit communities and not some Coinbase mint with millions of users ...

I have high hopes for Chaumian mints, too but fear people will put all their funds into the same few providers' wallets.

Historically, paying 100sat/vB almost always got you next block confirmation but today's high fees are not exceptional historically.

This graph shows data for 100sat/vB or more. Today's fees barely show.

The 2017/2018 fee event considering 1sat/vB and above:

The end-of-2023 fee event:

These charts are rendered by a server that measures the mempool's size and as there is no such thing as "the mempool", it's only one server's perspective on things and that server occasionally loses data which I think are these vertical drops in mem pool size.

I'm now curious. If there is a deep secret facility somewhere, how long does it take for heat to dissipate through the rock. Let's say you dig 500m deep and through some layer of ground water that you use to cool down any air from ventilation to ambient temperature. Let's say it's a 10MW facility. Unless there is good data on the temperature of a wide area prior to the installation, you wouldn't notice this as the heat would dissipate over a wide area and even 10MW would not make a dent compared to what the sun radiates on a square km for example.

thermal imaging certainly is great to locate secret facilities but do you really think this cam was deactivated on behalf of some 3 letter agency? HOTSAT-2 will soon be launched and for big facilities, more conventional thermal imaging satellites should already be enough to spot these anomalies.

nos2x-fox? Is there an alternative on firefox or did you uninstall firefox?