Por incrível que pareça, ser decentralizado torna o Nostr uma ferramenta extremamente interessante para criar ambientes virtuais muito mais seguros para as crianças.
Seria necessário, claro, ajuste nos clients hoje existentes para a introdução de controle parental nas configurações de relay. Mas não parece existir impossibilidades técnicas sérias.
Seria possível, inclusive, que os próprios pais os criassem seus próprios relays personalizados, de modo que, através da curadoria deles, os clients das criança seriam abastecidos com conteúdo previamente escolhido, da mesma forma que uma mãe hoje escolhe a música que toca ou o livro infantil que compra para o filho.
Tenho certeza que nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z já deslumbrou ideais de controle parental para o Amethyst em um futuro próximo.
I see a couple of problems in those points you make.
1) Human speech is messy and moral standards shift over time, over culture, and geography. Centralized content moderation, especially when involves grey areas, is an untreatable problem. You would necessarily need to pasteurize the entire humanity into a homogenous group to apply the same rules to everyone (forget about the right of Amazon tribes to live their lives in this case)
2) There always be a force for the existence of the State, because there always exist people that are entitled enough to think they have a solution for humanity's issues.
3) The next-door idea from centralized content moderation is to abolish private communication and End-to-End encryption. If we collectively think that there is no place on this Earth for X and Y, maybe there are no hard boundaries to where you can go to accomplish that pursuit.
4) The whole point about Nostr is that it's a censor-resistant protocol (or maybe nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 can correct me in that regard). We already knew that, at some point, the State would try to censor it, as they did with Bitcoin. We are removing the State's power of dictates what people have the right to say and we are not sorry about that.
5) Although I subscribe to the "free speech absolutism" ideal, I do think that we are going to avoid the amplification of most of the hate/discussing content in a decentralized way.
*hate/disgusting content
I see a couple of problems in those points you make.
1) Human speech is messy and moral standards shift over time, over culture, and geography. Centralized content moderation, especially when involves grey areas, is an untreatable problem. You would necessarily need to pasteurize the entire humanity into a homogenous group to apply the same rules to everyone (forget about the right of Amazon tribes to live their lives in this case)
2) There always be a force for the existence of the State, because there always exist people that are entitled enough to think they have a solution for humanity's issues.
3) The next-door idea from centralized content moderation is to abolish private communication and End-to-End encryption. If we collectively think that there is no place on this Earth for X and Y, maybe there are no hard boundaries to where you can go to accomplish that pursuit.
4) The whole point about Nostr is that it's a censor-resistant protocol (or maybe nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 can correct me in that regard). We already knew that, at some point, the State would try to censor it, as they did with Bitcoin. We are removing the State's power of dictates what people have the right to say and we are not sorry about that.
5) Although I subscribe to the "free speech absolutism" ideal, I do think that we are going to avoid the amplification of most of the hate/discussing content in a decentralized way.
And in those mechanisms relies the original sin
You already have a way to stop them: block them and call them out. In the close future, there will be relays that have a more strict and specific content policy, so if you agree with the policies, you can plug your feed only on those relays. But we have to be careful about what we wish for.
While I believe that Eliezer Yudkowsky and Elon Musk's remarks about the dangers of AI are well intended and reasonable, my deepest and selfish fear is that this over-cautionary approach to AI will, ultimately, slow down the AI-driven breakthroughs necessary to have my mother with me in this life for a little longer.
Gosto do termo "aceitacionista". "Gado'", no seu sentido figurado, já representa coisas diferentes demais. E pela competição com seu sentido literal original, acaba se diluindo nas buscas feitas no Google/redes sociais. "Aceitacionista" representa algo muito mais específico.
1-click zaps are going to change the world
Na verdade, é mais garantido a escassez do Bitcoin que do próprio ouro. É bem possível que em poucas décadas se iniciei a mineração de metais precisos em asteróides e outros corpos celestes. Já foram verificados vários corpos desse tipo https://institutominere.com.br/blog/asteroide-feito-de-ouro-nasa-spacex. Um único asteróide desse poderia jogar o preço do ouro no chão
Na verdade, é mais garantido a escassez do Bitcoin que do próprio ouro. É bem possível que em poucas décadas se iniciei a mineração de metais precisos em asteróides e outros corpos celestes. Já foram verificados vários corpos desse tipo https://institutominere.com.br/blog/asteroide-feito-de-ouro-nasa-spacex. Um único asteróide desse poderia jogar o preço do ouro no chão
Welcome to Nostr, Ben! Please take the time to configure a lightning wallet so we can demonstrate appreciation for your content.
Agora means "now" in Portuguese but "Ágora" means the same both in English and Portuguese: a public space where the public discourse takes place.
🚨 ABSURDO: Ministra Rosa Weber, Presidente do STF, pauta julgamento sobre descriminalização do porte de drogas para uso pessoal.
Ação estava paralisada desde 2015 e o placar já está em 3x0 a favor da descriminalização, com votos de Gilmar Mendes, Fachin e Barroso.
Via Gazeta Brasil (https://gazetabrasil.com.br/justica/2023/05/18/rosa-weber-pauta-descriminalizacao-do-porte-de-drogas-para-uso-pessoal/)
#Brasil
Não precisa mais de legislativo e executivo. Somos governados por uma junta de imperadores de toga.
A notícia se passa em Portugal. Mas aqui no Brasil seria até pior. Provavelmente condenariam o proprietário a sair do seu imóvel para dar lugar ao ladrão
Não se culpe, todo mundo aqui está aprendendo!