I thought that was the question - what I would like to see in all/most clients
Allowing a threaded view, don't know if that's recent but it would be useful on any client.
Also, seeing people's relays
Most young people should have the majority of their savings in bitcoin.
All in. No regrets.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1691159338423910400/pu/vid/1280x720/TsKfvpzw1gJP5ztV.mp4?tag=12
I like how he does a double take after he says "bitcoin should not be a dominant portion of any investor's portfolio" and nobody agrees with him wholeheartedly like he expected đ
What is this account doing? nostr:npub1ekcftpq3nynlcj2fyjeg67znskwgv5glxffyxsrd9m9488h9jqlsyfc8rr đ
The handle could be a hint. It's full of high-entropy messages (hard to compress). The ideal type of messages for saturating free relays?
Sometimes. But it's easier if I can cajole it into believing the same as my conscious mind
On a similar note, I recently learned about "civil asset forfeiture" and it's insane:
I had similar questions
nostr:note1d45ynp6sewknfy4hvgfg03s6w6k8a6nphpjf49zn3d4lv0mwswvslsg6mx
Feature request to #nostr client devs: the ability to follow a *note* (i.e. receive all replies to that note), without necessarily following its author(s) nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z
Interesting idea... However B could feed the device an old state of the blockchain, so it would require the device to incorporate (say) the block height into the signature, and every recipient of the signature would then need to know that they have to verify whether it corresponds to the blockchain's recent block height
Thanks - I am not really looking for an implementation of the above scenario that is as favorable as possible to A. Rather, I am wondering whether there could exist a technique to provably destroy such a "wrapped" key by B (not by A).
I don't want to discount negative experiences due to bigotry, these definitely exist.
But besides that, maybe the perceived male-centeredness is real and has to do with the fact that males are more likely to be comfortable with the bare-bones style of what a new technology usually looks like (no offense to the devs who are doing a stellar job working at lightning speed):
Accordingly, in its early days a platform tends to be a sausage fest, and this sets the tone of the conversation for newcomers by default. As the platform grows, and more women join as well, they would feel more comfortable in something closer to this:
The platform itself moves stepwise into that direction, wanting to grow and be more inclusive, usually in order to attract ad revenue. Friction ensues, hostility increases, people feel either stifled or abused or both.
What's so great about #nostr is that vastly more aesthetics and rules of conduct can coexist on the same protocol, than on a single platform! Anyone can use the client(s) they prefer, and use the relays they wish (or even run their own relay). We will definitely run into many novel problems and challenges along the way, but the sheer size of the space of possibilities makes me very optimistic #grownostr
With a straw to drink it through the green suit
Cryptography-savvy people: I am curious, is the following possible?
1) Company A gives employee B a (software and/or hardware) device that allows B to do something, e.g. sign certain transactions in the name of A.
2) B uses the device during his employment.
3) At the end of his employment, B sends A cryptographic proof that he has destroyed the device, i.e. that he is no longer able to sign transactions in the name of A.
Obviously, simply giving B a private key will not work for this, since that can always be written down on a paper napkin. But can a private key be wrapped in some layer of cryptography that still allows for it to be used, and provably destroyed at some point?
#asknostr
âWhat is to be done with the millions of facts that bear witness that men, consciously, that is fully understanding their real interests, have left them in the background and have rushed headlong on another path, to meet peril and danger, compelled to this course by nobody and by nothing, but, as it were, simply disliking the beaten track, and have obstinately, wilfully, struck out another difficult, absurd way, seeking it almost in the darkness."
#Bitcoin is f u money, Fiat is f me money
Great point! Indeed, you would probably need a separate PoW network on a sufficiently distant planet. And there could be a competitive advantage to running an "exchange" on a satellite halfway between the two planets, because it will have a kind of information parity
