4c
nobody
4c2113ceedac590dce5ceea209efc199078986d2a908070725ff5f62941d5bea
account deleted

He’s upset that someone who circumvented security not once, but twice, is being given a hard time for it. This guy’s a fucking moron.

Bitcoin magazine didn’t run facial recognition, the secret service did, you dolt.

Sticking up for someone who continuously attempted to circumvent security, doesn’t make you look any smarter either.

If he would’ve came in like everyone else instead of sneaking in through an exit door and maybe if he hadn’t placed his own need for a death stick, over the safety of everyone else in the building, you would certainly be bitching about something different today. 🙄

Fuck off.🖕🏻

This is more likely to happen in Europe, for a couple reasons.

1) Over 50% of Americans use an iPhone (I’m one of them), getting them to switch to a third party app that doesn’t offer anything over iMessage, is a big ask.

2)America is one country, obviously. And as such, are governed by the same federal laws throughout. Europe, being made up of many smaller countries, all with different federal regulations, makes switching to an app that is self governing, the smart choice.

What people also fail to realize is, you’re not just asking those few people to come on board, you’re asking all of their followers as well. And depending on how many followers they have, that may be asking too much.

I am the eggmen, they are the eggmen, I am the walrus. Goo goo g’joob. That is all, #nostr 😅

The messed up part is, there is no out of bounds for this shit. It doesn’t matter what genre, they are going to shoehorn in some rhetoric about being queer.

Here’s the thing I don’t get. If there is only a small percentage of the population that identifies as queer, why the fuck are they in almost 100% of every god damned show I turn on. It’s not always in your face, sometimes it’s real subtle shit, like The Acolyte Episode one . There was a line where two characters where talking about the main character’s loved ones and they said “your mothers” got out safe, blah blah blah. You see what they did there, they’re trying to normalize a homosexual relationship when it comes to raising a child. Fuck that.

The people throwing their votes away are the ones who feel like they have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Telling me I’m throwing my vote away because I choose the third option, is the dumbest fucking thing I have heard of in quite some time.

While you’re praying for their safety, ask him why he put them in that predicament in the first place.

Replying to Avatar Lebanese Hodl

Shook nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx's hand and proceeded to delete Twitter. Change happens in real life guys #NostrOnly

I hope you washed your hands after.😂

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

Those of you who have paid close attention to Trump's speech at Bitcoin 2024 may have noticed that the former President – accidentally or intentionally – appears to have given away a lot more on his plans for the future of Bitcoin than meets the eye.

Despite his assurances to protect open source development and self-custody in the US, Trump is first and foremost a national security president, highlighted by his remarks on terrorism and immigration. A loosening of AML/CFT laws, which currently see several open-source developers under indictment, seems unlikely (though a democrat law enforcement officer in the White House may arguably not do us any better).

During Trump's past presidency, the US passed the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, which increased penalties for AML/CFT offenses and established beneficial ownership requirements for LLCs to FinCEN.

While Trump vetoed the NDAA, it appears that he did not do so due to the AMLA2020, but rather because the NDAA kept Trump from his crusade to repeal Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act, which protects Internet Service Providers from liability for information hosted and transmitted.

According to Trump, Section 230 is a "national security risk" which "will make our intelligence virtually impossible to conduct".

If you had hoped that a Trump presidency would reduce the risks of developers being held liable for "illicit activity", you may do best in thinking again – "Broadcasting" 'illicit transactions' is precisely what Samourai Wallet currently stands accused of, which would hardly be arguable under the striking of Section 230.

Between incoherent ramblings on god, AI, and electric cars, Trump essentially used his 50-minute speaking slot to introduce The Bitcoin Dollar between the lines: a CBDC alternative to expand US hegemony beyond the petrodollar system directly into consumer wallets across the planet.

Don't forget that the vast space between your ears is intelligence's field of play. For Trump, Bitcoin is merely a tool to "extend the dominance of the US Dollar to new frontiers all around the world", and if his speech showed us anything, its that you are nothing more than another pawn at the end of the identity politics chessboard, where a banner hangs that reads: Congratulations, you’ve been played.

This Rage Weekly is out featuring a full opinion on the much anticipated Trump speech at Bitcoin 2024. Subscribe for free or read all issues online:

https://www.therage.co/strap-in-for-the-bitcoin-dollar/

You do realize it’s the government that landed us in this mess and y’all want to put bitcoin in their laps?JFC

He’s not just a legit option, he’s the only option. Jorgensen should’ve had her chance in 2020, instead people continue to vote for the lesser of two evils. 🙈

The system’s not broken, the people are.