Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ
4c800257a588a82849d049817c2bdaad984b25a45ad9f6dad66e47d3b47e3b2f
ʙoarᴅ cerᴛɪꜰɪeᴅ ᴛecʜno-ᴘʜaɢe. mʏ mɪnᴅ ɪs ʜunɢrʏ, anᴅ ꜰeeᴅs on noveʟᴛʏ. ᴅo ʏou ʜave someᴛʜɪnɢ ᴛo sʜare ᴛʜaᴛ ɪ never ʜearᴅ? "𝔅𝔢 𝔠𝔞𝔯𝔢𝔣𝔲𝔩 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔫𝔬𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤; 𝔟𝔲𝔱 𝔦𝔫 𝔢𝔳𝔢𝔯𝔶 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔟𝔶 𝔭𝔯𝔞𝔶𝔢𝔯 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔰𝔲𝔭𝔭𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔫𝔨𝔰𝔤𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔩𝔢𝔱 𝔶𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔯𝔢𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔰 𝔟𝔢 𝔨𝔫𝔬𝔴𝔫 𝔲𝔫𝔱𝔬 𝔊𝔬𝔡. 𝔄𝔫𝔡 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔭𝔢𝔞𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔊𝔬𝔡, 𝔴𝔥𝔦𝔠𝔥 𝔭𝔞𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔱𝔥 𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔲𝔫𝔡𝔢𝔯𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔦𝔫𝔤, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔨𝔢𝔢𝔭 𝔶𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔥𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔰 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔡𝔰 𝔱𝔥𝔯𝔬𝔲𝔤𝔥 ℭ𝔥𝔯𝔦𝔰𝔱 𝔍𝔢𝔰𝔲𝔰" - 𝔓𝔥𝔦𝔩𝔦𝔭𝔭𝔦𝔞𝔫𝔰 4:6-7 ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ: @mleku1 ᴍᴀᴛʀɪx: @mleku17:matrix.org ꜱɪᴍᴘʟᴇx: https://smp15.simplex.im/a#PPkiqGvf5kZ3AbFWBh3_tw1b_YgvnkSgDEc_-IuuRWc

adoption at the cost of advantaging those who are literally throwing money at this without any concept of a business at the end, which is partly why some really dumbshit is being done, almost nobody is building a business here, and you are proposing to remove the only feature that they ARE supporting that enables money to flow into the treasuries of development shops?

better to get slow, gradual adoption and a faster track to self-funding than doing retarted things like removing one of the most novel and unique features of the protocol

i suppose you are being funded by a grant also... and don't seem to get it that it would be better if it was paying customers

i've got a gripe with teh lack of authentication, which really is crippling the potential for paid relay usage and keeping the self-funding of the development of the protocol stalled

talking about cutting out this essential feature for creating cash flow for developers and node operators is just silly, come on

better would be to make an interface to metamask so eferiums can pay each other for shit

i wouldn't trade my dual 27" 1440p displays for anything less than a 32" 4k

i don't like traveling, that's why i live here in madeira now, and happily stuck in one place for another 9 months

that guy is just a troll anyway, i bet he practically copied and pasted it from some wannabe navy seal pretender on facebook

when shitcoiners stop with the rollups bullcrap and start working with state channels we can talk about something else as far as payments on the protocol go

there literally is no alternative to lightning for payments as small as 1 sat

of course pay no attention to the fact that this also suits mongolia, tajikistan, kazakhstan, georgia, azerbaijan, to a large extent, india, pakistan since they are all continental and reachable via land routes that are not controlled by UK/USA maritime power

that looks like a bulgarian woman... i have a good friend and there was this girl who was gf of a friend of mine with this kind of frizzy dark brown hair and somewhat african looking features... same kinds of brow, nose, lip shape

not a common look but quite beautiful i think

oh, we can add wishy washy to the list too. good going, continue please

my bias that i find people who use weasel words and coercive "friend" expressions to pretend they win arguments because they actually didn't think about the stupid shit they just babbled?

no, that is precisely me embarrassing you for being loud about dumb ideas and don't worry i have had this happen to me many times that's why i know it's good for you

also you are a "dude blablablablabla" guy as well as all the other things

i had almost started to think you were not psychotic but you proved me wrong

dude, you don't know jack about distributed systems, or even discrete mathematics and why this will be so overloaded with jackasses reediting their articles to their viewpoint when other jackasses reedit it to their viewpoint...

have you even thought about how to keep a cap on that? are you going to prune the database of old entries or ratelimit them?