If you and I agree on it, then it is theoretically possible. But as of now, there is no network that has such a guarantee-free promise. Even lightnings msat promise is unenforceable.

Very fractional. Unenforceably fractional :)

This must be a joke. Or some sort of estimate. It’s got more decimals than even a lightning payment could support.

No.

How does one monitor this?

Back in the day, I ran a gotenna mesh node with an antenna on my roof over looking my city. Had about 20mi range. Relay via residential isp.

The downside? It was gotenna and hence useful to essentially nobody.

Starlink as bridge for mesh relay

Exactly. The Supreme Court is really just a game of placating the public with the appearance of careful thoughtful construction of law through wise consideration of difficult cases, but what it really is is just a game of unintelligent activism followed by minimally restricting the activism in a way that does the least possible to protect the rights of the people.

Nope. I’ll be working, unfortunately. Not sure when I’ll be at another conference. But hope it’s a good one!

This is why I have the right to keep and bear arms that shall not be infringed.

The problem with the US Supreme Court isn’t that most were appointed by conservative presidents.

The real problem is that the liberal justices are complete f*cking political hack morons incapable of weaving a coherent logical legal argument out of any set of facts.

Justice is best served when we have opposing sides of equal intelligence. But the Supreme Court is like 6 to 0 on the capability/competency scale.

nostr:npub17tyke9lkgxd98ruyeul6wt3pj3s9uxzgp9hxu5tsenjmweue6sqq4y3mgl howdy!

Good to see you on Nostr! Got the metal seed signer I ordered when we met in Prague. Hope life is treating you well. Enjoy camping!

If you could control the value of the money, you could set population size to whatever level your heart desires. If you believe earth is too full and we need to take drastic action to make the weather better, you’d engineer the outcome we see today.

Lack of population growth is a sign the economy is manipulated far below natural level.

Humans get better at doing shit as time goes by. This should support more future humans. If somehow the productivity growth caused by people getting better at whatever it is we do is insufficient to cause family formation and population growth, assuredly either the economy is rigged or there has been some catastrophic change in the reproductive capacity/desire of mankind. There are plenty of resources available to be utilized to support a much much larger population than we have on earth today.

1,000,000 bitcoin.

Yeah, I get these all the time. Made a cool 65,000,000 sats yesterday.

I’m a bachelor this week.

While I miss the fam, I gotta admit, it was awesome to make a quadruple thick steak with fresh truffle slices, have some wine, and listen to “boring bitcoin podcasts” on my couch…all while nobody cares if I’m even clothed.

Life is good.

If someone inclined to believe makes you act like this by merely asking reasonable questions then I presume there isn’t a tremendous amount of reason for me to care acutely about this Q stuff. Maybe it’s real and you’re just impatient. Maybe it’s not and you’re deluded.

Either way, I’ll keep my mind open and suspend judgement for now and I thank you for opening my eyes to things I previously did not know. You’ve moved me more than you know but I see no reason to believe or act upon said belief yet.

Thx for sending this. I sent a more in depth reply to a prior note.

This is an unusual reaction and unexpected. My questions are valid and deserve thought, not feeling. I do appreciate you posting hours of video for me to review. From my first 30 minutes reviewing q proofs from the three videos you subsequently sent, it seems possible if not likely that someone posting as Q is reasonably close to POTUS. But it also seems many proofs rely on words or topics in tweets and posts…things like Q post uses the word tarmac and then a day later Trump post uses the word tarmac. When adding up the many similar seeming coincidences, it starts to feel more planned than accidental. The proper way to evaluate this feeling is by using the same methodology between known unrelated posters and seeing if discernment can lead to similar outcome say between Trudeau and a Canadian political blogger. I bet it can but am unconvinced.

So while the proofs can’t and in fact don’t intend to _prove_ anything, it seems strange Q spends so much effort trying to repeatedly bring legitimacy / believability to his position…either give reasonable evidence once and then move on with the message or forgo proving / supporting legitimacy entirely…The photographic stuff seems like enough evidence for me to listen to his message…the rest seems plausible but irrelevant.

But then I’m left with: ok, I’ll listen, but what is the message? There doesn’t seem to be anything to act on, so more proof isn’t necessary. I’m totally ok with it being all a hoax or totally real. I just don’t see the point. What is one to _do_ with this info?