Avatar
Sysiphuscript
528ca350b553f5f9d8fdb1b42cb0b87ebbe74eadce47fccb27425b057dd5d754

The only answer Odell was looking for.

Gives me an excuse to stop building stuff and begin to chip at a few books on the book shelf.

I bet this will be used on american citizens one day.

Robots will displace low paying illegal immigrant jobs I think.

Lately finding it fun tosolveing data structure and algorithm problems from a functional programming angle. Focusing on not assigning to variables.

Thomas Jefferson passionately disliked them, if I'm not mistaken.

Bloomberg is wondering if $999 is a psychological threshold for USA consumers. But ignores the moral qualm that those prices are brought to them via slave labor.

I always thought going to college for CS was taking the long road and stalling personal innovation. Then I began to wonder if it hurts more than helps. Now it seems these students would have done way better going 1 year to a community college to get referrals and building cool stuff on the side. That would get their foot in and then every year they could bounce and double their salary till they gotabover 100k salary.

Did RFK go and change the limit levels on the bottles or something?

If the developer never worked with other devs in github, are they really a senior? If the dev has never written a unit test, are they really a senior?

Replying to Avatar Sai

Let’s stop dancing around it: Billionaires shouldn’t exist.

No one ā€œearnsā€ a billion dollars.

You extract a billion.

From underpaid workers.

From deregulated industries.

From tax havens.

From stolen land, stolen labor, and generational exploitation.

Meanwhile, nearly 700 million people live in extreme poverty on less than $2 a day (source: World Bank). And we’re out here defending the people who could end global hunger with a fraction of their net worth but choose not to?

Let’s be clear:

You don’t get to be a billionaire without creating suffering.

You underpay. You outsource. You lay off. You lobby to kill regulations.

You exploit a system built to protect wealth—not people.

Why do we tolerate it?

Because we’ve been sold a lie: that ā€œsomeday,ā€ we might be rich too.

But statistically, you’re more likely to be struck by lightning than become a billionaire.

This fantasy isn’t harmless—it’s a weapon used to keep you compliant.

There is no moral justification for hoarding more wealth than entire nations while children die from preventable diseases.

Billionaires aren’t a sign of a healthy economy.

They’re a symptom of a broken one.

A society that lets a few live like gods while millions suffer is not free—it’s feudal.

Amazingly, over the last five decades, 79 Trillion dollars has been redistributed to the 1% from the lower 90%.

In the documentary Where To Invade Next, Michael Moore interviews the owners of a textiles plant in Italy and informs them that if they used American business practices, they could drastically increase their profits and asks them why wouldn’t they do that?

Their reply was, they don’t need to become ā€œmore richā€. They are already wealthy enough and bring enough in to enjoy their lives. The woman says clearly, ā€œI’d rather see that go to the employees. To have real relationships with them, to see them happy. It’s amazing to hear people ask how your mother is doing, from a coworker.ā€

The power vacuum is full throttle, and the powers that be have become a snowball rolling down a hill, and we have reached critical mass.

I’m not left, I’m not right.

I’m a person. I think for myself.

It’s obvious that we are heading in a bad direction, and I hope leaders rise and the people stand up for themselves. Speak up, say something, anything is better than complacency and silence.

šŸ”±

I wonder what happens to the world's power dynamic if USA destroyed their billionaires but China and others let theirs take over markets that our billionaires controlled.

So isn't Zelensky, if the videos are accurate