Why don't you just search for such videos? You're being ridiculous.
Oh. You muted me. I sure wish I knew why. I've only ever said nice things to you.
π± Comfrey Myth vs. Fact
Myth: Comfrey is only useful as a medicinal herb.
Fact: Itβs also a compost accelerator, mulch powerhouse, pollinator plant, and animal fodder. It feeds your whole system.
π Full guide here:
https://www.bitcoinandshow.com/the-comfrey-owners-manual-is-here/
#comfrey #permaculture #homestead #gardening #soilhealth
Good to know
We could all just leave each other to their own beliefs, and then whoever is wrong gets blown up by an ICBM, because being wrong makes you less fit to survive. Everyone is happy - the right person is happy, the wrong person is happy, the other wrong person is happy, more wrong people are happy, and even mother earth is happy because wrong people aren't supposed to survive.
Only about 10% of us need to wake up to cripple the machine.
π€ and everyday, we get closer.
Not all rockets use combustion. You can look up combustion reactions. It should've also been in your high school chemistry class.
But you're the one making wild claims - its your job to produce evidence.
I'll say we have the ability to bond telepathically.
Read the robot's refutation of your robot's refutation of refutations.
You're doing this on purpose. You saw this :
Anyways, I can do it too. Here :
Refuting the Challenges to Rocket Operation in Vacuum
Each of the points raised regarding the operation of rockets in a vacuum can be addressed by understanding the fundamental principles of physics, particularly Newton's laws of motion and the behavior of gases. Hereβs a detailed refutation of each point:
1. Combustion in Vacuum
Refutation: While it is true that combustion requires an oxidizer, rockets carry their own oxidizers (like liquid oxygen) in their fuel tanks. This allows them to burn fuel in a vacuum. The combustion process in rockets is not dependent on atmospheric oxygen.
2. Pressure Requirements for Motion
Refutation: Rockets operate on Newton's third law of motion: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The rocket expels exhaust gases backward, which propels the rocket forward, even in a vacuum where there is no external medium to push against.
3. Exhaust Behavior in Vacuum
Refutation: While gases do expand in a vacuum, rocket exhaust is expelled at high velocities, creating a coherent jet. The high-speed exhaust maintains its momentum and direction, allowing for effective thrust. The brightness of the exhaust is due to the combustion process, which can be observed in rocket launches.
4. Flame Visibility
Refutation: Flames can be visible in a vacuum if they are produced by a combustion process that generates light. The combustion of rocket fuel creates a bright flame due to the high temperatures and chemical reactions involved, independent of the surrounding air.
5. Effects of Reduced Air Pressure
Refutation: Rockets are designed to operate in low-oxygen environments. The combustion process is optimized for the specific fuel and oxidizer mixture, allowing them to burn effectively at high altitudes and in space.
6. Air Pressure Requires a Barrier
Refutation: The concept of pressure does not apply in the same way in a vacuum. Rockets do not need an external barrier to create thrust; they generate thrust by expelling mass (exhaust) at high speed, which is sufficient to propel them forward.
7. Footage Limitations / Possible CGI
Refutation: While high-altitude footage may be limited, there are numerous verified launches and missions (e.g., from NASA, ESA) that provide credible evidence of rocket operations in space. Independent verification comes from multiple space agencies and private companies.
8. Momentum Transfer Expectation
Refutation: The internal push of gases expelled from the rocket engine creates momentum according to Newton's laws. The rocket moves forward as the exhaust gases are pushed backward, demonstrating that motion can occur without an external medium.
9. Heat Dissipation in Vacuum
Refutation: While convection is not possible in a vacuum, heat can be dissipated through radiation. Rockets are designed to manage heat through radiative cooling, which is effective in the vacuum of space.
10. Structural Integrity in Vacuum
Refutation: Rockets are engineered to withstand the conditions of space, including vacuum. The materials used are tested for structural integrity under various conditions, and many successful missions have demonstrated their resilience.
11. Direction of Force in Vacuum
Refutation: The direction of force in a vacuum is defined by the direction of the exhaust flow. Newton's laws apply universally, and the rocket's motion is determined by the thrust vector created by the expelled gases, regardless of the surrounding medium.
These points illustrate that rockets are indeed capable of operating effectively in a vacuum, relying on fundamental principles of physics rather than the presence of an external medium.
Ask AI
Search
Stop generating
Stop generating
GPT-4o may display inaccurate or offensive information.
The Saturn V rocket combined hydrogen and oxygen to cause propulsion - it had tanks full of hydrogen and tanks full of oxygen. I don't think that's actually a combustion reaction, since carbon has to be in one of the products of combustion reactions. Current rockets use methalox fuel, which includes the oxygen and I think is a combustion reaction.
Ah! That's one of those books I always forget when I'm buying new books! Time to stick it in the cart.
Let's make this joint work **_and_** establish more joints. Idk if its fetishizing space, but I know that humans only flourish on frontiers. We stagnate in the established civilized areas. America has never recovered from conquering the west. Europe has never recovered from finishing its age of exploration. All golden ages coincide with new frontiers ; all periods of stagnation follow the conquest of the frontier.
In the current paradigm, there's exactly zero chance of colonizing space. Zero. Rocketry only developed as a means to strike enemies further away. The "victory" of the US in the space race was not moral - it was proof of capability to deliver payloads directly to Moscow. That's the only reason it caused a stir over there. But what victory is in colonizing the moon, or Mars, or extracting resources from the Psyche group of asteroids? That doesn't "win" in geopolitics. In fact, it would make us less competitive on the terrestrial stage. It won't happen. Ever. We'll go extinct squabbling down here.
Unless something changes. #Bitcoin is the change that is necessary to unlock space colonization. A country that saves in bitcoin can't be robbed by corrupt elite. And if corrupt elite can't rob their citizens OR anyone else's, they can't have their wars. Bitcoin further pushes us toward the technological future by directly monetarily rewarding anyone who builds better tech.
Bitcoin is the necessary first step to humanity's next stage of evolution - Homo Sapiens Solaris.
#Space
We can grow the pie, or we can fight over the pieces. #Bitcoin nudges the world more toward growing the pie, since the pieces become harder to take.
π€ probably the biggest hurdle for the normies getting bitcoin is the concept of, "don't trust ; verify." Just look at their diet... They trust labels, so their naive trust is the food of corrupt corporations. If they can't learn the lesson while being literally poisoned, then how will they ever learn it?
It doesn't look like they're interested in earth, unless it changes trajectory again.
That's the shark that ate my keys in my boating accident!
Hey... Hey... There's an alien spaceship the size of a city in our solar system...
Yeah. The shit my ancestors did blows my mind. "Let's spend half a year on a wooden boat and go explore! Only half the boats will make, but F it, let's do it!"
I feel like the metaphysical ramifications of cryptography are unappreciated. Like, I'm pretty sure if I sit here and think about these insane numbers, I can just get high off the thinking.
I've noticed the uptick recently too. Its going to get worse. People are turning to religion out of desperation, not love. Men are being pushed out of the workforce and the most obvious thing is that women are actually not being pushed out of work. That doesn't make women the cause - the money printing is the cause - but a lot of people won't see that, and anyways some people are just happy for a reason to hate. So, this false religiosity is growing because there are some brands of Christianity that offer the severity they want to impose on others. I think there's a nice term for it, but I can't remember - basically the psychology of being unable to cope with your Shadow because of the pressure of a situation, causing people to enact the shadow - same thing happened in Germany between the wars.
I didn't know that about Paul. I keep telling myself to give Paul a chance, but I always feel like he's an imposter or usurper. Like, it should have been Peter doing everything he did, IMO.
Bitcoin is our best defense against extraterrestrial aliens.
India, cuz f it. My top pick was Myanmar, but that's not looking good right now.
I'm guessing its something like "go fuck yourself"
Baking powder is an abomination. Every time I try following a re-cipe with it, the result sucks. New rule for me! Never use baking powder. That's the rule from now on or until I forget probably in a month.
Alright. I made an assumption. Shouldn't have, and I apologize. So now I gotta ask - do you really think some supposedly impending disaster is justification for violating people's rights?
Nation states are the opposite of civilization. They are parasites upon civilization. As their hosts lose vitality, they look for other hosts to parasitize. Then, war.
Is this... fiat pepperoni pizza?
I'd be happy with a sat for every mile, too
Uh and if you piss brown, go to the doctor immediately. I've had that. Kidneys could be entirely shut down if you get that.
In what way should I be using encryption? That is definitely an area where I need to improve.
Is that the same product key they want when you pirate them? Did people just walk through these stores and snap pic..... Ohhhh. No cell phones back then. Huh. Dang.
I don't think you want to, though. But... You don't have to do anything... Thanks for talking
Isn't it worse to let someone be an example of unchristian behavior? A non-christian is convinced either for or against Christianity based on our behavior. This dude is actively harming Christianity while pretending to be one. I should be silent while wolves in sheep skin prey on the unsuspecting?
Now look at his current response. I have achieved my goal. All can see his hypocrisy. This is a predator. Christians **_must_** see this and turn away from it.
Its fine, and I respect your not wanting to get in it and telling me your thoughts. I actually did want to be wrong. My reaction isn't only to him - there's a history of Christians being rude (to put it mildly) and my reaction may be mostly to that, rather than only this instance.
Being concise on a nuanced topic only results in misunderstanding. He asked for me to explain, do I did. Responding that he didn't read is then entirely a prideful and hateful response - because he asked for it.
My response then was justified. And he then proved his hypocrisy by blocking me. I could have been wrong, and I did regret my reaction. But he made me right. This is not a case where I like being right.