You wake up at 2 a.m. look up and see this. What’s your first words?

If you don't understand what is going on in the Middle East, I can give you the TL;DR:

Nobody likes Israelis. Even Israelis don't like Israelis.

Nobody likes Palestinians, either. Even the Palestinians don't really care about Palestinians.

Iran is also pretty unpopular. Even Iranians don't really like Iran...

REDACTED TALLOW!! NOW AVAILABLE!!👇

nostr:nprofile1qqsx0tdgudz9xt9lstcwwqj89cjv0ztwpcwfvg674ja25juxzczjzugpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skueqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsnja9wa

Do you believe we’re destined for insignificance

Sitting on the porch watching lightning ⚡️

According to the graph, it has surged to the highest rate since the year before last.

Signer apps should automatically reject any signing request with their users nsec or the hex equivalent in the event.

AI will do dumb things. Protective signer apps are our last defense. I hope they stand up to the challenge.

no.

I'm saying the person paying you knows there's a "true" output on the chain and which one it is.

because they spent it to your key.

but if the output appears again on the chain they have no way of knowing if its a true spend of not.

so no surveillance happens.

but they can look at it and wonder about it. it is greater than zero information

maybe they're Chainanalysis and they have other data to correlate.

ideally we would reveal zero information right? the plan is to move to a system than reveals much less about the payee.

but this is just blockchain stuff, none of it is news.

a "pubkey" is published to the chain and, if it appears in the future, its a possible spend.

theres no way to tell if it is a real spend or not, unless you have access to the sending wallet.

it is prudent to ensure an Adversary that may be actively surveiling you is not able to access the wallet that sent you the output.

this is important to understand when using #monero.

For me it was the power company that services the lines. Called and asked them to change it out and they had it done the same week.

no, fuck you, i will use my own brain and fingers thanks

protip:

don't let your AI write "overall" as the first word of the last paragraph of your article, ok? just don't

in summary

and so

these are human ways to say "ok i said enough"

literally every multi paragraph text from AI has Overall as the last fucking word of the last paragraph

you will not find that i am wrong, it is getting very irritating

i'm also getting tired of hearing expressions like "to be fair" also, but humans write that one, it gets a bit tired tho, y'alls aren't cultivating your own slang

How do I politely tell iPhone assholes who send me audio messages to stop?

We're all tired of this AI generated 'emotional' text vomit.

if you think that is sophisticated you are one dumb motherfucker.

So which is it? Are filters working or not? If they are not working, why remove the filter on OP_RETURN? It’s an obvious contradiction. Why are spammers not using OP_RETURN now, when the filter is in place? Following the initial logic, it should be trivial for them to bypass the filter and include larger data than the 83 bytes.

Damn...that's quite low but I respect your point of view. Will work harder.