What is missing? #askNostr

Which iOS Nostr apps use custom emojis? People are saying good moaning and I can’t reply with Officer Crabtree.

THAT IS A DISGRACE!

#AskNostr

At least ¾ of the people who use primal don't use other nostr clients, and use the word primal instead the of nostr when talking about nostr.

I see it ALL THE TIME ON HERE.

!!!! The most adorable

Maybe I can just auth with a random account on outbox relays. That will make them work without revealing the main user.

Auth with the main account on trusted relays, random ones for everyone else.

I will test tomorrow.

I keep looking for the Translate Bitch

Being more "easily illegal" isn't really a selling point.

Vibing anti-spam filters into bitchatX

There's a pretty vibrant ATproto developer community, many of whom are building things completely off Bluesky's infra. A lot of people here would be surprised at what's going on there.

Someone should create a nostr client that focuses on advanced spam filtering.

You could call it Knotstr.

There are many non-Bluesky ATprotocol clients.

Of course they are centralised. Bluesky is to Atproto what Primal is to Nostr.

by @14g23h34

🧵Let's talk about Marxist Inversion in BTC:

This is a thread on my observations of the core versus knots debate as an outsider.

Every organization, company or institution WILL have to contend with those that try to invert its original purpose (Marxists).

To understand why I call them that you must let go of the idea that Marxism exists only as a political system and see it instead as a worldview.

Marxism can exist in your bookclub your Pilates group or your Tech startup.

The motivation is simple:

The established order allows for little personal advancement.

Preventing scope creep and organizational drift is not censorship, it is conservation.

It is the immune system of the existing identity against dilution of purpose. Marxists coopt an existing body/identity and invert its original purpose to create a blue ocean; a new market to expand their personal influence or wealth.

By INVERTING the original purpose they borrow credibility from the existing reputation and user base while forwarding their new goals.

Examples:

●When politicians focus more on foreign interests than its citizens. (NGOs, Wars)

●When game developers stop producing entertaining games that the fan base wants in favor of their personal ideologies (gamergate)

●When a CEO diverts resources in favor of ulterior motives forcing organizational drift. (Disney, Budlight)

●When Universities focus on politics and influence peddling over education. (endowments, government research, DEI patronage jobs)

●When regulators act as gatekeepers and corporate tollbooths instead of serving the public (FDA, NIH, SEC)

●When news organizations focus on coordinating narratives over reporting events (all of them)

●When Developers expand the scope of Bitcoin beyond a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Marxist tactics:

Marxism attacks organizations in three primary ways.

Leadership:

In a company they typically target the founders for removal by involving them in scandal. Founders have Sweat Equity and care about an organization more than an average employee. They are the only ones willing to risk their career to resist. This is why Elon Musk was attacked so strongly.

Thankfully Bitcoin is immune to this because Bitcoin has no centralized founders.

Identity destruction:

Marxism views traditional identities as obstacles to be overturned in Revolution. This can be something banal like a company communication policy or as grandiose as gender.

Regardless, the “current thing” must change because progress demands it. And through the system of Marxist gradualism (never ending nibbles of change) they boil the frogs, or in this case the plebs.

Many people wouldn't identify themselves as marxists or even understand what it is, but they run the code.

Normie NPC American has been deeply indoctrinated by Marxism through popular culture for decades.

If someone is consistently attempting to overturn established standars, traditions or identities you have a revolutionary Marxist on your hands.

Bitcoins identity as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system stands in the way of the new identity they want for Bitcoin.

By introducing an endless string of small new features and changes Bitcoins identity will be slowly diluted and inverted to serve a new selfish purpose.

Think about a startup that wanted to create a singular good product but every Director and VP introduced their own pet project and eventually scope creep dilutes the identity of the brand.

Something that is everything is also nothing because it lacks a singular identity and purpose to be defended above all others.

Bitcoin's identity as hard MONEY must be defended because that is the ONLY vector marxists have to attack it.

Culture comes from Identity. What we do comes from who we are and what we believe as bitcoiners.

If they can't change Bitcoins identity and culture they lose.

Bitcoin is conservative:

I often hear the argument made that Bitcoin is libertarian, but Bitcoin is also the most conservative asset ever to exist.

21 million forever, no free rides, proof of work only.

I don't use conservative in the mainstream political sense. I use it in the form of Conservation of Natural Resources.

●Of preventing the tragedy of the commons.

●Of preserving the current over endless performative progress.

●Saving for the future instead of spending in the now.

●Discouraging debt and encouraging quality.

These are all ideals of a conservative culture. It is no accident that so many bitcoiners identify Bitcoin as the Christian ideal of money.

Bitcoin is conservative Fiat is Progressive.

I like Libertarians but Marxists know Libertarians can't defend themselves, and this is why so many marxists masquerade as Libertarians (parasitism, inversion).

Why? because from the libertarian perspective any defense can be inverted as an offense.

“Don't censor my peer-peer porn coin or you're being authoritarian!”

Marxists use the same tactic on Christians:

“Why are you defending christianity? You're not allowed to defend yourself, Jesus said turn the other cheek!”

Make no apologies for conserving and defending an existing identity.

Defending WHAT CURRENTLY IS is never an offensive act.

Bitcoins identity as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system must be conserved.

Marxists attack language:

Marxism is ego based and parasitic. Because of this Marxists will lie or use euphemisms to smuggle their actions inside of a moral framework.

Euphemism: "Your promoting censorship"

Translation: "You are impeding my will"

"Censorship" is only the body they use to incubate their Marxist actions. Once their goals are achieved they would dispense with it. The true meaning of the word censorship is irrelevant.

Remember, their primary attack is on identity, they attack the identity of THE WORD censorship and reform it for their own uses.

You will recognize examples of this vocabulary destruction in culture war topics:

Fat -> Fat Bodied,

Homeless -> The Unhoused, Breastfeeding -> Chestfeeding, Mother -> Birthing person.

By destroying the language they are fighting on a meta level. They cannot win on the principles of their arguments and so they attack the rules of the game itself.

You must recognize the bait and switch semantic word game being played.

In conclusion:

I forget who referred to Marxism as a “series of bitch moves” but that's the best way to understand how they think and act.

They won't and can't fight fair or stand on principle because they have an immoral ideology and they don't have those skills.

Instead of listening to market feedback they will abuse your nodes. When caught they will laugh and downplay their abuse or attempt to INVERT the morality:

“If all it took was to attack some nodes to trigger the knotzis, then knots must be pretty retarded”

or,

“good luck trying to stop me from raping your node with spam and jpegs”

The translation is:

“it's your fault that you're upset by my bad behavior and I'm going to intentionally be worse”

If all other tactics fail they default to credentialism.

The appeal to Authority we saw during covid lockdowns by governments and regulators is the perfect example.

“Trust the science, trust the experts, trust the devs...”

“Knots is only one person! vs. an entire team of professionals”

(Lie, appeal to authority)

Bitcoin doesn't need a Priestly class. Bitcoin is for the plebs.

Who am I to tell you this? I'm not a developer nor am I a technical bitcoiner.

I am an Orthodox Christian that has seen this Marxist pattern play out across 20 years of working with startups, corporates and governments and I am extremely good at spotting marxists.

I don't doubt that my sweeping generality doesn't apply to every core developer, but I am confident that what we have at Core is a Marxist attack on bitcoin because they're using the Marxist playbook.

Bitcoin is truth and Marxists are incapable of telling it.

Stick to the truth.

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Conserve it, protect it.

Taking a dig at Bluesky for following the law is ... I dunno. What are they supposed to do?

what/where is this article thing you’re trying to use?

Clearly I'm posting these the wrong way. What are people using?

I think it's resolvable in this case as the coarser geohash channels are not including the finer geohash channels, so accumulators make no sense.

Thank you, that's really interesting :)

How about instead of moronic ad hominem's, you contest what they say, or not ?

The point about a single dev who makes all decisions and pushes changes to master is correct no ?

Any other contributors are doing doodles in the margins, icons, hashes of files and other low value/impact things.

But they want you to believe that filters don't work.

What does seem to work is the union between miners and Bitcoin Core.

use whatever mempool filter you want. your mempool, your rules. it doesn't change anything, it doesn't affect me at all. I couldn't care less.

the only thing that's concerning is that the artificial larp instigated by podcasters and marketing people without any technical background or competence divides our community.

this isn't a problem yet, but it will become one when bitcoin is attacked by serious adversaries that threaten to fork it. NFTs are not serious adversaries. they are not even in the room with us right now. we've seen this play out before in 2017 and it will happen again.

it's a classic divide and conquer. we are currently divided. conquer is next. strap on. there's only one bitcoin.

Yeah I think it will dominate microtransactions. This is exciting to me because we have never really been able to explore this frontier. The tech has always been too shitty.

You're totally right. Don't keep large amounts or long term funds in ecash.

I would turn your question back and ask why the constant dismissal of ecash? People's reaction seems completely out of proportion to the threat. I'm not talking about you specifically but it's a very common sentiment among bitcoiners.

Gotta like the winters, though.

80% of my Claude usage is fixing mistakes introduced by Claude.