I don't know anything, but from what I have observed, beta/test releases are 0.x.x while production releases start at 1.x.x
Why not just go with P2P?
Made me think of warrant canary.
Blockstream, I assume? Don't the satellites just broadcast blocks? We need a parallel internet next.
It'll just be the Coinbase® Network. Then Blackrock can tokenize assets and we'll have ETH-TFs. Shitcoin Inception.
Too low for Bitcoin p2p connections? Yes. But I was suggesting sending a Tx over a mesh with a flag (e.g. btc:'tx hex'). When a mesh node receives the flagged message, it could check to see if it has an internet connection (LTE on paired device) and if so, use this to broadcast the tx to the Bitcoin network. Use case might be too spefic and limited to warrant development though.
I believe it is because most mobile wallets connect to someone else's public (centralized) node to broadcast transactions. That node can therefore see all your transactions.
It is not as useful if you run your own node and your mobile wallet connects back to it, but more useful as a default option for mobile wallets rather than connecting to a public node to broadcast.
It could probably also be used for projects like #meshtastic to broadcast transactions sent on the mesh to the Bitcoin network via any reachable mesh devices with an internet connection.
As much as I hate bots, this makes me smile.

How so? Just curious. Seeing more criticism of him lately. I've known people who have done his thing and been happy with it. And the people I know who do criticize him haven't tried it. What is the basis for criticizing his program?
As they say, cypherpunks write code.
Me trying to press 'see more...' in Primal. 😮💨😅
Let's just fix that quote how they taught me in university:
"...Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is an attack on democracy. It's an attack on education. It's an attack on how our economy works." -Stacey Abrams
Happy Halving! #zapathon

