Avatar
Harry
622ba6c7207a43ee7e2811506b2118bbeb7c604144c328aefc00a6b3af4482be
I'm a bird

Both are Internet protocols

"Without internet" usually means without interconnected subnets or offline, e.g. using USB to exchange data, or p2p via Bluetooth. What do you mean?

Ftp, http, and other such protocols run on top of IP (internet protocol), so are by definition "the internet"

It would be nice to have p2p (usb, Bluetooth) note exchange. I believe that Scuttlebutt Protocol tried to do something like that...

QWERTLE #652 4/6

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛

β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©

β¬›πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wine or beer might work, but I would not recommend as the default, because high histamine levels, might actually have the opposite effect

Yes, some strong alcohol: vodca, cachaΓ§a, tequila

this one is good too: https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ check it out

Well, absolute numbers of PRs are not that meaningful (it's easy to open a PR on GitHub and leave it be for ages) and should not be compared to apps neither. we are talking a protocol here -- there goes a lot of design and consideration, any mistakes are hard to revert if both clients and servers implement them.

That said, I think it's best to compare development of nostr protocol to other protocols. In this relation, my impression is that nostr is way easier to contribute to the other procols, say mastodon.

Finally, even having NIP accepted, does not guarantee that any will implement it. Many devs are actually working on the implementation first, and then contributing a relevant NIP. It's more organic like that.

It's not what I'm suggesting. It's in the context of the dev being closed, which it's generally not the case.

For your comment, I don't think that a split is possible at this phase. The devs seem to be generally happy with the direction and it's still relatively easy to influence the development.

No, no review, no rejection, no approval, null ;)

No, I haven't , and had no nip rejected neither

By the "club" do you mean the quality or the social aspect?

If 1, then, yeah most devs are not good. Most devs are average. That's why it's an average, im likely there too, he he

If 2, then I assume that the ppl that started the project, care about it, they are open to suggestions, but since its important to them, they want to assure the quality, so that all of us users, have usable platform and good experience. If everyones pull reqs were accepted, nostr would stop working quite quickly.

Do you know any case where a good nip was rejected?

BTW, it can also be forked by anyone!