The recording is included in the article. I'd bet my last sat it's Elon. Plus, this isn't the first time he used this identity to attack people on Twitter. A second recording is included of a previous Twitter Spaces where the same Adrian Dittman, using no voice changer, forgets he's supposed to pretending not to be Elon, and refers to himself in the 1st person, as Elon. So, there's no question this is his burder identity.
I can just imagine him sitting alone in his fortress of solitude, seething with rage over all the MAGAts turning on him because he expressed support for the H1B visa program. He drops into a K-hole and when he emerges, he whips out his $10 voice changer and logs into Twitter Spaces as burner identity. He's so angry that he abandons the voice changer and just starts attacking people. I mean, this would be an incredible movie moment. It's almost unbelievable.
Apparently, #Elon created a new burner account on #Twitter, and then went to a Twitter Spaces (whatever that is) and used a voice changer to mask his voice, but got fed up about 20 seconds in and switched to his normal voice. During this Spaces thing, he praised himself in the 3rd person because he was pretending to be this other person, Adrian Dittman, and started talking shit to all his critics on Twitter, and banning people who criticized him.
This is definitely one of the weirder chapters in the Elon Musk saga. Literally the richest man in the universe, and he's so pathetic and lonely that he's using fake accounts to praise himself, and shit-talk people who called him out. Surely, there can't be a bigger loser among us. #blog
The trick is to be totally serious when you present the fortune. Like this is serious business. I get you'll get at least an extra scoop. Lol
I'd make sure I had that fortune on me the next time I go to Panda Express and they're being tight with the orange chicken. I'd be like, "Excuse me, sir, but perhaps you should take a look at your company's official literature before cutting me off at one scoop..."
I'm glad I read the replies before posting my own. I hate it when I lazily don't read the replies first and end up posting the same shit someone else already posted.
You can't run a single-sig wallet with BitKey. It only works in a multi-sig configuration.
If you choose a low fee rate (1 sat/Vb), your transaction will just keep getting kicked back, block after block. It'll take a super long time to make it to the current block and get a confirmation.
Kiwi Browser is no longer being maintained, and is no longer recommended for use.
Nos2x is the Android signer. There are extensions for both Chrome and Firefox (and variants) although most chromium browsers don't support extensions on Android. ButIt works flawlessly on Firefox. Just search for Nos2x in the Firefox extension manager and you'll find it.
I've got the perfect baseball card for those rear spokes!
New nostr client shows up https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/99502693e910fdf1449ea7d813e2ac9af39ec547af43b602b07bed67004ec289.mp4
The competition is getting stiff! This can only lead to good things for us nostriches!
I'm trying to understand those denim leg hoops on his calves, but I'm not having much luck.
I have the best results when listening while driving. Something about combination of subconsciously focusing on the road, while letting the book play in the background leads to maximum retention.
It seems really user-friendly, which is good because it will allow normies to use the most secure wallet options. Typically, they stick with basic single-sig configurations using a software key because it's easy and what all wallets support. And that's fine for <$1000 wallets, but when you're holding more than $1000, multi-sig makes more sense, and provides a higher level of protection. BitKey will facilitate large holdings for the masses.
Personally, I tend to go with the more technically complicated options. It's just my nature. I sorta like the idea of using a system where I can use multiple types of hardware signers along with software keys. I like the flexibility. That's where I'm sorta on the fence. Because I've already got a Tapsigner, and would just need a Coldcard or a Portal to have what I need for a Taproot multi-sig wallet. So, I don't know if I want to go down that road, or if I want to buy a BitKey and just use that system instead.
I think I'm going to download the BitKey wallet app and see if I like it. Because if I used BitKey, I'd be locked into their wallet, so I have to like it. So I still have some investigations to do to figure out which way I'm going to go.
It's the increased blood flow to an area with hardened, contracted skin, and nerve tissue. It causes the scabbing process to accelerate and the nerve tissue gets moved and compressed causing the itching.
I'm currently using Nunchuk Wallet, and it has a similar system but it's like Casa. You can use Coldcard, Tapsigner, or Portal as 2 or your 3 keys, and the 3rd key is encrypted and stored on the Nunchuk servers. I've got a Tapsigner, and was considering getting a Coldcard so I could make a Taproot 2/3 multi wallet, but now I'm considering the BitKey. I've got some decisions to make... Thanks for your information. I really appreciate it.
Great question. The Bitkey device is a key to the multisig along with your phone. You cannot link any other keys (to my knowledge).
That’s one of the tradeoffs vs a solution like nostr:npub1casacasahesdrpu6npfth2t0ae37a2cdwwg3c4fkt30v7gzffx3q7wtzdc where you can link 3rd party keys (Trezor/Ledger) to the multi sig set up.
Ok, so basically that one multi-sig protocol using the 1) BitKey, 2) mobile device, and 3) encrypted key on BitKey servers is the one way BitKey works. It can't be used as a standalone key for signing single-sig transactions.
Can you use It with a single-sig wallet as well as multi-sig?