Avatar
Chris Liss
6ad3e2a34818b153c81f48c58f44e5199e7b4fc8dbe37810a000dce3c90b7740
posting without conscience things in which most people are not interested | www.chrisliss.com

My explanation as to why I’m on NOSTR instead of X now. (X is one day per week.)

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxrTpxy2WIveniL5bOb4ZRiBTLFlFhahPX

When the aliens finally invaded, it wasn’t the way most people had expected. There’s was no Independence Day shootout or War of the Worlds capitulation.

https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/the-aliens

Best sports feed on social media, only on NOSTR. nostr:note1rylzxql2cx2zlagztf04zhxwlvsy8jppjemu73jjt20hzndrn4ts5dkdrc

Replying to Avatar mrclownworld

There weren’t any actual flights. There’s been a lot of work done on this, I’m just going off memory, but we can try to find the sources (a lot of them were on letsrollforums which is sadly no more, but you can pull stuff from the way back machine it’s just difficult to find specific things you’re looking for).

The passengers all paid cash, there were an insane number of millionaires on the flights, there was something about the flight route not having other flights before or after (I forget the specifics).

What happened is the “passengers” were all characters in the drill. There are certain pieces we can work from - WCPO in Cincinnati reporting that United 93 landed at CLE with some 200 passengers and went to the NASA facility to disembark, for example. That’s a wild clue. There’s also someone who detailed seeing passengers on the tarmac and realizing later that was one of the hijacked planes.

If you total up the figures of all 4 planes it’s about 200.

What probably happened is the passengers, all of them players in the drill and probably intelligence agents burning an identity, boarded planes which met up and combined into one plane which was United 93 and landed in CLE. Midair, these planes “turned off their transponders then turnthem back on”. Why would they do that? The blip on the FAA screens in the drill was switching from the commercial jet to an unmarked white CIA jet (there are LOTS of people who claim to have seen these flying around that day, over Manhattan and over shanksville) - you can even see one in some of the goddamn official footage lol.

Those CIA jets became the hijacked flights for the FAA controllers. When they reached their destinations, they fired cruise missiles at their targets. Meanwhile, the CIA agent passengers are all disembarking in the NASA facility in Cleveland.

The alleged deceased in the towers were likely a mixture of CIA assets and simulated victims (I think the entire tower was a ghost town, basically just a PO Box for CIA front companies for 33, yes 33 years). There was great work on this theory at letsrollforums analyzing the official tenant rolls for the building but here’s a provocative gallery of interesting images related to the theory https://911crashtest.org/hollow-towers/

Simulated victims (or vicsims) is the term letsrollforums coined for the

Wfake people with photos names and bios who were generated to fill out the list of victims for the event. They did some deep analysis on the patterns in the names etc which I can’t fully recount, but they also point out a lot of photos look like what we now easily recognize as AI generated.

I’ll give you one example of a guy I personally think was a spook destroying an identity - there was a guy named Sean Patrick Lynch who worked at Cantor Fitzgerald. 1,200 CF employees allegedly died that day, 40% of the death toll. (CF certainly checks all the boxes of a CIA front to me). First of all, what are the odds of that? Secondly, there were actually officially two different Sean Patrick Lynch’s who worked for Cantor Fitzgerald and died that day. They both have obituaries you can find. What the hell are the odds?

Well, pretty high if Sean was a spook and had two separate cover legends working under the same name.

Sean’s college roommate is an extremely spooky Canadian Bitcoin shill (I like bitcoin but this guy is clearly a spook plant, came out of nowhere, is annoying and obnoxious, keeps bringing other spooks into Bitcoin at the highest levels) named Greg Foss.

Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

So, yeah; this is a long-winded answer to what happened to the passengers - there weren’t any.

And it all follows a rule of thumb that I’ve developed after all this research - watch for sleight of hand. Why do you assume any of the facts they give you? Pretending to kill 20 children in an elementary school (Sandy Hopk) or 83 women and children in a compound (Waco) is much easier and cheaper than actually killing anyone and just as scary. And you can just fake the court cases about it later (they’re all just paperwork and the government has had AI for decades)

Thanks — these explanations are great. Will definitely think about this more.

One problem with all of this is if you accept the possibility that one of the towers was literally just a CIA front for 33 years, you start to doubt almost everything.

I don’t just mean the mass casualty events, but everything. I’m basically there but it makes for a lot of paranoia. Like — “how is that empty restaurant on this fancy street still in business? Is this a front?”

Everything anomalous starts to become a bit sinister. Of course I prefer the truth, whatever it might be, but you don’t want to be looking for monsters under the bed.

Replying to Avatar mrclownworld

Amen brother amen. I started researching from exactly the same perspective and I applaud you for having it.

In fact, January 6 was a big breaking point for me. I have never voted for a Republican in my life and was never any fan of Donald Trump, but the insistence that January 6th was an insurrection was indeed insulting stupid. I spent weeks trying to unravel how one group of people was so intent on demonstrating that there was an organized and planned conspiracy to “attack” the capitol, but this same group was totally and completely uninterested in any of the video of Ray Epps that seemed to prove that exact thing. It was baffling and frustrating and infuriating.

And it led me to a video by someone named “Wooz News” that presented what at the time was a shocking explanation. (It’s not as shocking to me now, as I’ve now seen video analysis of the same type for the Boston Bombing, Sandy Hook, Vegas, 9/11 and others from Pekay, Sophia Smallstorm, Dallas Goldbug and others).

I encourage you to start with the Wooz News video and then check out the others.

The basic claim, which sounds insane until you actually examine the ample evidence, is that there are organized emergency drills that occasionally “go live” which essentially means they are reported to the media as live events. This is actually detailed at length in the Department of Homelabd Security’s HSEEP manual, the industry standard policy manual for conducting these drills - the media is frequently not told the event was just a drill until it’s over (and, these filmmakers argue, sometimes are never told). One wild example is the Taft High School shooting a week after Sandy Hook, where the media admits that the students were drilling a shooting when the shooter came in (what the hell are the odds. Another example is Uvalde where multiple students told the news that they had done “a drill” that day.

With that in mind, to answer your question - on 9/11, it is acknowledged that 4 war games were being run during the morning of the attacks. The war games simulated hijacked airplanes being flown into buildings, and spoofed FAA radars with planes. Famously, one FAA operator asked “is this real world, or is this exercise”. While these war games are acknowledged, they for some insane reason didn’t make it into the Commission Report.

9/11 was a series of emergency exercises that “went live” combined with a controlled demolition of those towers and a hijacking of the airwaves. Yes, the major networks often do “pool reports” where one network feeds the others the content. (Incidentally the Jan 6 committee was entirely a pool report from ABC, I had this explained to me by a Fox employee. He also told me the script for the Committee Hearings contained parentheticals, ie stage direction on emotional cues for how to say the lines)

There’s a documentary called September Clues that analyzes this last theory in depth, showing all the timing and cues that suggest one broadcast was performed from the same studio across all the major networks. I suspect it was run from inside Giuliani’s “terrorism headquarters” inside WTC7.

That documentary is the most thorough in demonstrating how there was actually only one “live” shot of a “plane” hitting anything, how it is deeply deeply flawed, and how the rest of the shots are created later (amateur footage) but the hook is already in.

You also made a great point - how was anyone on the ground fooled? They weren’t. There are exactly two kinds of people who were “on the ground” that morning, if you watch through the footage. People who seem confused and unsure when you talk about a plane, and others who are SURE they saw a plane, and they know exactly where it was flying and how fast and what kind of plane it was and this was definitely some kind of terrorist attack (crisis actors). It’s also worth noting that the many many people who heard multiple explosions of controlled demolition are confident of what they heard, but it’s not like these people who saw a plane - they’re not hyper determined to convince you.

To draw some of these conclusions, you have to watch as much footage as you can, which I did (and referred to in my original post). The techniques of all these events are extremely familiar to me as I work in fiction film, where the artifice is admitted. But it’s the exact same techniques taking place in news media and for the exact same reason - to get your eyeballs, make you feel a certain way, be a part of the group, manipulate you, make you feel something.

I hope this helps, I’m happy to find links to any sources you want to see, I’m happy to discuss this til the cows come home; I’m extremely admiring of your attitude about the pursuit of truth. We’ve been lied to for too long to stay duped. Cheers 🍻

I appreciate that explanation — what about the passengers who died in the planes — how to account for them? And the airline employees who got those planes ready that day, etc.

For example, I find it very dubious that four separate security guards at the Capitol that day “committed suicide” in the ensuing few months, but never heard anything similar about UA or AA employees. Many would have had to know whether those specific flights took off/landed.

I love conspiracy theories. I want to hear and consider all of them because the official narrative we’ve been offered is so obviously bullshit. Would I have thought powerful politicians and celebrities were traveling to the private island of a sex-trafficker 10 years ago? No, I would have thought it was very farfetched. And yet this is now a reported fact.

Would I have thought the corporate media would elevate a bunched of clogged-artery Trumpers taking selfies in the Capitol after the guards let them in as an unarmed “insurrection” where no one (except a protester) was killed? No. I would say that would be too absurd even for them.

So the narrative isn’t just bullshit. It’s intelligence-insulting bullshit that offends my sensibilities as a citizen. Fuck you for calling that an “insurrection”, fuck you for pushing the mRNA poison on people, fuck you for shutting down society for a virus that has an IFR of the flu that you created in a lab in the first place!

But if you’re gonna allege that airplanes did not hit towers, I am open to it, but you have to account for the known facts — HOW did they fool thousands of witnesses on the ground. What happened to the people allegedly aboard those planes? Where did they all go? Were there no relatives of people who were on those flights who lost them?

I will consider *any* alternative explanation to the obviously fake ones we received, but it has to add up, has to withstand scrutiny better than the official one. nostr:note1hj3dcml5dhfp3y5l7c4npwgmx7hjtuz83f4557sfs9ry4akjdgqsnx2lqv

I ask this not to disagree that the story we’ve been told about what happened is severely wanting. I just want to understand what actually happened, and I’m open to *any* theory that can account for the known facts. It’s really disturbing we know so little about so many massive events.

“As unfair as surreptitious wealth redistribution via fiat is, I want to bring up a parallel and perhaps more pernicious process in our midst: fiat morality. Many people — and I would argue most of our institutions — subscribe to a moral framework wherein it’s presumed the right thing to do is provide the greatest good for the greatest number.”

https://chrisliss.substack.com/p/fiat-morality

All of sports NOSTR is less than 1 percent.

That will change soon:

https://iris.to/realmansports@verified-nostr.com nostr:note19dn6c03zcgcctkeuuagmjxnp9hc94cfwr6crvuj4vwkl6sv4nn6slhygke

Even if it could somehow be faked so well that people live, on the ground, could be fooled about what they saw, what about the people who booked flights on those planes? Where did they all go?

Chlorella is actually harmful if you’ve been exposed to mercury (most people have been to some extent) as it binds with the mercury, but the bond isn’t strong enough to actually move it out of the body.

Instead, it randomly picks up the molecules from where your body decided to store them and drops them off somewhere random, often causing harm.

he needs sats for food, so I hope you’re right!

Gonna make a NOSTR account for my dog. He has a lot to say about existing as a person trapped in a dog body/mind.

Probably get more followers than me, but I’m good with that.

Gonna bring some sports normies to NOSTR (have already brought a few), but none of you bitcoin nerds are into the NFL?

Someone needs to build an anonymous BTC-fundable spread-picking pool, survivor pool, etc.

It might start a stampede if it were done rake and KYC-free. nostr:note1arrtlq2qrkf89xynvkml0vnuqz6wq7luqqg9u9jvh5377x88xjuq4u7j27

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

(Posted on Twitter because it’s more relevant there, but I won’t link to it so you don’t have to experience that place 😂)

The great insanity of our time has been:

The idea that facts cannot be shared or discussed, if they don’t support “the correct conclusion.”

People who want to discuss a major topic or problem honestly, are met with extreme hate and vicious denouncement if the truth or facts they find aren’t perfectly aligned with The Narrative.

• Are deaths and injuries from all weather and climate related issues plummeting and projected to continue? This is “dangerous” and makes you a “denier” and must be censored. Not because it isn’t true, it’s because it questions the “final solution” that has already been decided by the political class.

• Are there 10s of thousands of reports of deaths and extremely serious injury associated with the vaxzein? If you say anything at all other than “safe and effective” or even talk to someone who has been injured, you are a literal murderer of innocent old grandmothers & you’re probably racist too.

• Does a woman have a vagina? This is so profoundly evil that each utterance of it is literal genocide of trans people.

The words literally slice through the air like crazed dementors on the hunt and cut down trans people like word demons, blood flying everywhere. The horrors of such a grammatical tyranny can never be recovered from. It’s instant death to 1000s.

EVERY issue seems to be met with this same stubborn and narcissistic box that is riddled with lies, twisted statistics, & half truths. And it’s being used to excuse the most horrible forms of censorship violations of individual rights.

Step outside of the approved box with even the most utterly basic of facts, and you’re an evil, racist, treasonous conspiracy theorist (or literally any other disgusting label they can conjure)

This does SO much damage to the discussion because not only are people not allowed to hold a sober, nuanced position on anything, but when you hear someone spread blatant lies and then they start screaming like a lunatic when you point it out and call you a murderer - then what remotely intelligent or sensible person would believe absolutely anything that person says again?

It has led to the total breakdown of trust in our institutions that is so bad that people will literally believe *any* crazy story for no other reason than they are certain they are being lied to with the “approved narrative.”

The establishment losing their minds over people believing anything they find on the internet, need to look in the mirror. They have been pouring gasoline on this fire for *years.*

The establishment has made it perfectly clear, over and over again, that truth is subject to any change necessary so that it aligns with “the good guys’ [insert approved conclusion]”

Problem is, as I see it, knowingly lying, censoring the truth, & viciously attacking - even putting people in cages - for speaking the truth, has never been what “the good guys” do.

Hope you have a great day 😁👍🏻

Spot on. Fiat morality. Believe whatever is necessary for “the greater good.” Suppress any fact that would interfere with the agenda. And just as the money printers can conjure up funds for war, the fiat morality printers can conjure up reasons why it’s essential not to speak of certain facts or express certain dissenting opinions. “It’s for public health”. “It’s for national security.”

The financial system is based on nothing — totally bankrupt, but the policy makers and speech policers are morally bankrupt in a similar vein.

I aim to make Real Man Sports the best sports/sports betting/fantasy sports account on social media. And only available on NOSTR. nostr:note1rfwjw70hqqa6zyh34smz6nj6x0e7rzr6rcfhd4l7va630ld5zvks9nqe7w