Avatar
Apatight⚡️
6b8f57e047f4029ca93591f5d561e4c2a247ff5931117d250eb1406ca328979a
⚡️ I’m here for it | bitcoin | lightning | nostr Esse Quam Videri FREEDOM IS THE ALL TIME HIGH

Bitcoin is for everyone.

Replying to Avatar OgFOMK ArTS

OgFOMK ArTS -- Stupid Satoshi Satan Satya Satisfaction Saturn and Wandering

https://njump.me/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqfsad2hgm4shf7qywhz9t4r03v7qfkfc36qv0lsekyguh97rvwj3qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgkwaehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsqg9w7kgsnpq3v5rqvgptw630ux3u5xykggtuuw2trn08g4mtqf4a8c25ceuf

Good Afternoon.

Sometimes I spend way to much time with stupid people because I am also very stupid. Sometimes I can't spend time with smart people because they are stupid and don't realize it. Sometimes I can't spend time with anyone because the reflection and projection of my own stupidity is too much.

Spending time with myself I get a chance to really see how stupid I am. The feedback is in my results of personal activities. Now, when I spend time with God and I let go of all that I am or I am not I find that I accomplish much more. I wonder why?

My answer is that I am just a reflection of God and when I think too much about myself I lose all of that reflectivity and I become part of the opposition so eloquently named Satan (Opposition in Hebrew) or Shaitan (Opposition in Arabic). I can even become a nesting home for demonic beings which leads to carelessness.

I've often reflected on the term Satoshi as a personal cognate in Japanese of Satya or Sat in Sanskrit. I.e. it means "truth". I am wondering if Satisfaction, Saturn and Satan also have a phonetic relationship. Is Satan the antithesis of Satya as an inverse, "an" prefix meaning "not". And in this case a suffix as "not", or is Satan a materialist term for the circumnavigation or obfuscation of "truth". Is Satiation and Satisfaction terms that lead to carelessness because the "truth" is identified as a stagnant example and thus eliminating the power of Godliness? Saturn is the planet of fierce judgement in the occult. Why? Saturn is a temporary vehicle and not a permanent fixture in this Universe.

I'm just wondering. Or am I wandering?

So good afternoon.

---

Nostrification: https://njump.me/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqfsad2hgm4shf7qywhz9t4r03v7qfkfc36qv0lsekyguh97rvwj3qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgkwaehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsqg9w7kgsnpq3v5rqvgptw630ux3u5xykggtuuw2trn08g4mtqf4a8c25ceuf

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/814709

I was about to ask what you’ve been up to?

Looking forward to an epoch without “experts”.

I don’t believe these to be mutually exclusive. Rich people want privacy more. Central banks and governments don’t want it for the plebs, but we are gonna get it anyway.

There is only one immediately available engine for growth for the fiat zombie global economy. Bitcoin is it, there is nothing else. You’re either growing or dying, there ain’t no third direction.

Dude… stupidity. Governments are going through exactly what you are. There are no cows left to milk to pay the bill. They MUST find a new engine of debt growth. They will lend against bitcoin stacks. There is nothing else to fuel the fiat ponzi. If they don’t lend against bitcoin, fiat implodes. Like right fucking now.

Bitcoin is NOT a hedge. It’s the money. Store of value -> Medium of Exchange -> Unit of account. The state has no store of value. It owes more than it can pay… relax. It’s going to buy a digital store of value, which defeats its supremacy as a unit of account. Calm the fuck down.

Store of value-> Medium of Exchange -> Unit of account. Some are earlier than others

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

David Bailey just posted the draft for an executive order for the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve under Trump – and it's an absolute nightmare for anyone using bitcoin as money.

First, the draft order defines Bitcoin as "a finite store-of-value asset, akin to digital gold."

As someone who has lived on Bitcoin for a fairly long time, I can say that Bitcoin is not merely a "store-of-value asset", but a money for payment and day to day purchases.

Defining Bitcoin as a "store-of-value asset" reinforces the ossification narrative (who needs to move a stonk several times in a day?) which may put developers at risk when prioritizing changes to btc to make it more usable as money (think scaling for example).

With this definition, a softfork to activate covenants may become an issue of US national security that goes against the US' definition of its primary goals - directly putting developers in the firing line of the United States Government.

The draft states that federal agencies, such as the US Marshall's Service, may not auction seized Bitcoin off, but must contribute them to the strategic reserve.

This not only reduces the Bitcoin in circulation available to the public, but additionally sets the incentive for the US to increase its seizing efforts – think increased AML/KYC.

While I'm no fan of the strategic reserve in general, this draft is an even bigger disappointment than Sen. Lummis' proposed Bitcoin Act.

To compare this to how El Salvador has implemented Bitcoin, which I admit I initially wasn't a fan of either, ES directly gives citizens rights to use Bitcoin as money - which is a huge upside to benefit the people, and not just the national security state.

No offense, but letting a couple of children that just graduated college and a guy who runs a magazine draft US policy is a scene straight out of idiocracy.

Next time, maybe try speaking to the people actually building and using bitcoin, not just to the boomers and national security goons that sit on the money like a fat kid at the cake buffet.

Incredibly unprofessional conduct here by BPI, a huge risk to anyone using Bitcoin for anything other than an investment, and a testament to the people involved being more interested in furthering their own importance than to empower people with a money without state.

Sincerely hope that this EO is drastically challenged on all levels and hopefully somehow deemed unconstitutional to protect btc and the people developing it.

Questions:

1- When money is chosen by the people, has there been a lifecycle process of adoption, first as a store of value, then a medium of exchange, then a unit of account?

2- Doesn’t every captured money skip the store of value step, and go to decree?

3- We have cashu mints and Lightning. What L2s do we not have that can subvert the state? I mean, cross border payments are already present. It seems increased privacy is the number 1 bitcoiner problem to solve, not nation states grasping at power via the money printer.

4- At some point somebody has to standup and say FUCK YOU. I am tired of theft being normalized.

Today is the day that cracks in the banking system due to overexposure of pension funds to REITs begins to rotate to bitcoin. Here we go… de-risking of pensions has begun.

NOSTR reminds me of myspace in the best ways. nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 and nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s are my toms. Myspace was way better than facebook… NOSTR is cooler than both.

“Moooom, I just wanna do hoodzap shit with my friends.” ⚡️