If you’re not yet convinced that the #TrumpAssassination was a “kayfabe-style” staged event, then, you need to incorporate the fact described below to your interpretation of the event and still have it makes sense.
Look at #Trump’s right hand position in the three attached images.
The first image is famous Doug Mills photo of a bullet passing by Trump.
The second image is a screenshot taken at the time where the first supersonic shockwave can be heard on the video.
The third image is a screenshot taken at the time where the second supersonic shockwave can be heard on the video.
A supersonic shockwave heard from Trump’s microphone indicates the moment at which a bullet passes by Trump’s microphone. Hence, the second image is the moment at which the first bullet passes by Trump’s microphone and respectively the third image is the audio signature for the second bullet.
Now, based on Trump’s right hand position, can you tell me which bullet Doug Mills photo has captured? The first or the second? It can’t be the third or following bullets as Trump has already ducked under the stand by then.
Yes, you’re correct it can be neither of them as the first image depicts Trump’s right hand mid-air while the second image has it on the stand and the third on his ear. You can verify for yourself that I took the screenshots of the video at the correct time by slowing down the video and pausing at the sound of the supersonic shockwaves: https://youtu.be/JW3X-nmHKmM
This means that one of the following is true:
- Doug Mills photo was tampered with and a bullet was added to it.
- The sound of the supersonic shockwaves was simulated to Trump’s microphone.
- Both of the hypothesis above are true.
What we know for sure is that Doug Mills photo and the supersonic shockwaves signature can’t be both authentic.
Considering this irrefutable fact, do you still believe that Trump assassination was a real failed attempt or that it was a #StagedAssassination?
After being confronted with this evidence those who still ignore it from their interpretation of the event are either in strong denial or disinfo agents. This is the smoking gun similar to how WTC7 is the canary in the coal mine of the 9/11 narrative. If you try making sense of the event while ignoring this key fact, your interpretation can’t be taken seriously.
#PsyOp #FalseFlag #EarGate 
Could you please attach the images again, maybe in a more censorship-resistant way?
Good morning, Constantin! ☕ 😎
Do you actually know how propaganda works? Here's a random lesson, find the "talking points".
"North Korea reporting on Trump's parade"
https://blossom.primal.net/f0d5b34d0b404fe573b2adf772e3ffbd5fe8618f8891fbfeadb4597486c5ff73.mp4
If I didn't know it was Korean, I'd think it was just a typical left-wing liberal media outlet here in Hungary. 😅😂
GM! ☕ 😎 Can you spot the transgendered person in this picture?
Of course you can't. Because transgendered people look just like everyone else. It's impossible to tell the difference.
A promise is a beautiful word, but Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän is even more beautiful! 😎 🍻
How can you tell the difference between vandalism and street art?
Exactly. These are just three isolated cases. That's far too few to talk about cycles.
I might be delusional, but I don't believe in four-year cycles. Not only do I think there won't be cycles in the future — I don't think there were real cycles in the past either. That might sound surprising at first, so let me explain.
In 2013, Bitcoin's price surged dramatically, then crashed hard in 2014. In 2017, it surged again, then crashed in 2018. Again, in 2021 it spiked, then plunged in 2022. At first glance, this does look exactly like the four-year cycles. But let's take a closer look!
The events of 2013/2014 were tied to the MtGox exchange. Back then, MtGox was the largest Bitcoin exchange and it managed to lose 650,000 bitcoins. An event of that scale obviously shook the entire sector and brought about a long crypto winter.
The 2017/2018 period was the era of the block size war. A key figure was Roger Ver, aka Bitcoin Jesus. Depending on the estimate, he may have controlled around 300,000 bitcoins when he pushed for the Bitcoin Cash fork — and basically burned all of it. That too caused massive market turmoil, ending in another crypto winter.
The 2021/2022 period was the time of the FTX exchange. Sam Bankman-Fried, its CEO, didn't believe in Bitcoin — he often criticized it as obsolete. More importantly, he sold off all the bitcoins belonging to FTX's customers in order to suppress the price. Sources vary, but it was roughly 100,000 bitcoins. Yet again, a perfect recipe for a crypto winter.
The point is: if a major player with hundreds of thousands of bitcoins loses their mind and goes full retard, they can tank the entire industry for years. And what's crucial: they destroy themselves in the process. These were isolated cases — MtGox, Roger Ver, Sam Bankman-Fried — all of them went down for good. They won't come back every four years to repeat what they did before. It's pure coincidence that these events happened roughly four years apart. If you only look at the price chart, it looks like the four-year cycles. Which conveniently fits the narrative people already have, because of the block reward halving every four years.
So that's the past. But what about the future? Of course, it's possible that new players with hundreds of thousands of bitcoins will go crazy again. It can happen in 2026 and 2030 — perfectly fitting the four-year cycle narrative. But hopefully, over time the market will mature. Bigger players will act more responsibly — it's their own interest, and the best interest of the entire industry.
📍 On my way to a business meeting this morning, where I’ll be giving a presentation about our company — mainly our precast concrete operations. For over 20 years, we’ve been manufacturing high-quality reinforced concrete elements in Hungary for industrial and infrastructure development.
🏗️ Soon we’re entering a new chapter: we’ll begin building affordable housing using precast technology — a major challenge and opportunity for the next decade.
📊 At the end of these talks, there’s always room for a personal topic: how do we prepare for the economic pressure ahead?
🔁 That’s where our “Plan B” comes in: #bitcoin. Not as a trend, but as part of our long-term corporate strategy. A decentralized, limited-supply money — immune to inflation, independent of political decisions, and accessible anywhere.
📖 And to make things more fun: today, anyone who answers the “question of the day” can win a copy of The Bitcoin Standard — a must-read for anyone who thinks long-term about capital preservation and freedom.
⸻
#bitcoin #PlanB #business #concrete #precast #infrastructure #affordablehousing #housingcrisis #strategy #storeofvalue #entrepreneurship #inflation #digitalfuture #TheBitcoinStandard
https://blossom.primal.net/854950d879af4fafccedde7a616ca6670bfc106404dd904a5466ffd611c0e602.mov
What is the question of the day? 🤔
Looks delicious.
In the good old times... 😊
GM! ☕ Be the change you want to see in the world! 😎
