Good rainy morning with coffee from Madeira #coffeechain Have a good Saturday

im misunderstanding your use case. a checkmark doesnt make sense. instead, use the existing nostr logos or prefix with `nostr:` e.g. nostr:@franzap.com. regarding logos, the thin ostrich was popular but doesn not scale down well. The n with the ostrich head works well in print

This seems like an extremely rare and niche use case for a logo. When was the last time you ever needed to hand draw a logo next to your name for other social networks? Most people just write IG, FB, Twitter, etc. I don’t think this is justification at all for proposing a new logo for Nostr.

Playing devil's advocate here but phone doesn't have a unique official logo. People use what they prefer yet everybody gets it.

A checkmark if the nip-05 checks out

why does a protocol even need a brand/logo?

He post was not written that way. If it sticks it sticks, but maybe that’s how he and you and others who want this should be presenting it. As it was worded it comes off very “full of yourselves” and corporatizing over a fairly prominent and organic element of Nostr culture, the ostrich. I appreciate the explanation that it is not those things. Presenting a logo as a suggestion is a very different thing from the way he worded his post. And the connection, if any, to his work and funding from OpenSats would be nice if clarified on these projects. Is this his personal projects? Or is this something being funded with publicly donated funds?

There you go

* RAG’d, not fine-tuned. Although that might work too

Agreed and we already do. Nothing wrong with presenting this as a logo that’s available to use publicly. My issue is how he presented it, calling it THE LOGO and specifically saying that “people” wanted it be non-ostrich themed. Which people? Niel is receiving OpenSats funding to do Nostr design, so is this something OpenSats is pushing for? I certainly have not seen much open discussion about it.

There are many examples of ostrich themed logos floating around. They work. Why completely disregard the organic branding imagery that has grown from within Nostr’s most active users? It’s not a company. It’s open. I understand if the ostrich is not to everyone’s taste, and there is nothing to stop someone from using alternative branding. But for anyone to insinuate that it’s time to get rid of the ostrich is pretty egotistical.

👎

Dear #Nostr community,

Today, I want to address a critical issue that’s been on my mind and on the minds of many in our decentralized world: the hypothetical scenario where app stores decide to ban all on-ramps to #Nostr apps.

This situation poses significant questions about the future of decentralized platforms, the role of major app stores, and the resilience of the #Nostr community in the face of censorship (which we probably will see in the 2024 elections).

If app stores were to ban #Nostr apps, the immediate impact could be a barrier for average users to access these platforms through the most common channels (e.g Apple App Store & Google Play Store)

This move could be seen as an attempt to curtail the reach of decentralized networks, influenced by various factors including regulatory pressures, content concerns, or even competitive motives from centralized entities. The tech giants want to maintain their monopolies.

However, the decentralized ethos of #Nostr is not one to back down in the face of such challenges. Alternative methods of accessing #Nostr, such as sideloading apps from websites or using other, more open app stores, would likely become more prevalent.

This situation would not only test but also potentially strengthen the community’s commitment to decentralization, privacy, and freedom of expression.

From a game theory perspective, this scenario presents an intriguing interplay of actions and reactions.

App Stores would have to balance their policies with the potential backlash and the growing demand for decentralized applications.

Users might be divided between those who find alternative ways to access #Nostr and those who are deterred by the additional steps required.

Developers could be incentivized to innovate and create more robust methods for distributing their apps, thus promoting an even more resilient decentralized ecosystem.

The Silver Lining …

While a ban from app stores can be seen as a setback, it could also serve as a catalyst for growth and awareness.

Such a move would bring into sharp focus the importance of decentralizing not just our platforms but also the means of accessing them.

It could spark a larger conversation about digital rights, censorship, and the role of major corporations in our digital lives.

As we navigate these challenges, it’s crucial to remember that the strength of #Nostr lies in its community and the shared belief in a decentralized future.

Let’s continue to support each other, explore alternative access methods, and stand united for the principles of decentralization, privacy, and free speech.

Let’s embrace this challenge as a chance to innovate, grow, and show the resilience of our community.

Stay humble and stack sats,

Mason

Please comment. I realize I don’t know what I don’t know. This is an open discussion around the principles of decentralization and free speech and I want to learn more.

WE WILL MAKE THE SUITS OBSOLETE AND THE SUITS WILL PAY FOR IT.

ONWARD 🫡