Developers needs to have good op-sec and go pseudonymous. True problem is funding. Not everyone can do open sourced development for free. Especially if there’s no idea the project will even work and have traction
We need open protocols and pseudonymous open sourced developers. Not CEOs
Why would anyone with fiat want Bitcoin?
Why would anyone with Bitcoin want fiat?
Why would anyone want to exchange between the two?
Why would anyone not want to use centralized exchanges?
Would would one want decentralized P2P exchange on their phone?
Why have you even bothered with the n3xB protocol?
Lets get n3xB going before you can no longer rely on centralized exchanges
You also don’t get any reward, potential or tangible, even if you happened to have built the most important software project the world have ever seen.
Ideally, to never take investor money really, or at least to take investor money as late as possible
Not all for-profit entrepreneurs have to take investor money. I am of a philosophy that one shouldn’t take money until they have solid Product Market Fit. Investor pressure is a choice, not an inseparable part of entrepreneurship
And imagine doing something that you know will net you no profit, no status, no fame. That’s what an pseudonymous open source developer like Satoshi was like.
How about spec and working code?
Absolutely. I’m afraid its too monolithic in nature. Its not really any different from RoboSat and I don’t see how it’ll get more liquidity than RoboSat
The Nostr ecosystem. What other solution is there to receive Zaps other than WoS for the average mobile phone based Nostr/Damus user?
Always been the Achilles heel of Bitcoin - incentivizing developers. Satoshi was never paid, and he himself left soon after. That is the nature of developing on Bitcoin, it is a thankless task.
Best we can do is we build in a fashion that others can build to interop/on top of. Small blocks in a large ecosystem. Monolithic projects in Bitcoin will always fail because incentives are not strong enough to keep such large projects afloat.
What made nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv fall out of love with Bitcoin and the industry?
Still not super clear what was the largest contributing factor to ending of Mutiny.
I suggest the opposite, to go more all-in on Bitcoin. Use Nostr beyond a medium for media, and make a layer 2 open decentralized protocol for Bitcoin/fiat exchanging
Are we over WoS being the only truly usable wallet for Zaps?
Missed the entire sub $50k dip due to nostr:npub1dllf8wmj6jk83r7chck6madmfgh3fges65ctpe5t6ueujazvvcvsh20tz5 syncing. Its simply an outdated architecture to build a P2P user experience. Bisq2 doesn’t change this one bit. Sorry to say RoboSat and Mostro are even bigger jokes when it comes to decentralization and liquidity.
Anyone want to build a new protocol first P2P ecosystem together? Anybody?
Freaking out about missing the dip. nostr:npub1dllf8wmj6jk83r7chck6madmfgh3fges65ctpe5t6ueujazvvcvsh20tz5 still syncing after 3 hours. We need much better P2P solutions than this
Want to. But my nostr:npub1dllf8wmj6jk83r7chck6madmfgh3fges65ctpe5t6ueujazvvcvsh20tz5 is still syncing, for 3 hours now. Last started just 3 weeks ago.
We need much better P2P solutions to have a chance of de-coupling ourselves from centralized exchange chokepoints.
We need something better than nostr:npub1dllf8wmj6jk83r7chck6madmfgh3fges65ctpe5t6ueujazvvcvsh20tz5 
Thanks. I didn’t see this particular one, but I know of Mostro and RoboSats. I also know of a few efforts to try to standardize order formats on top of Nostr. I guess n3xB is one of them.
Main difference I see is n3xB wants to establish a neutral protocol that uses nostr as the primary database. Where-as most other efforts are existing P2P trading solutions trying to have some level of inter-compatibility with each other, and using Nostr as a cache or backup to their central trade coordinators.
I see it as trying to make Mastodon work with Blue Sky, instead of creating Nostr. Still hoping for a Nostr like, common neutral protocol first approach to P2P solutions, along with a intercompatible layered approach. I took the first stab at it by creating a defined spec and a base library implementation. Will see if the developer community think this is a worthwhile approach vs the likes of Mostro/RoboSats etc that already exists
ARK TO DONATE A FIXED PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE TO OPEN SOURCE CONTRIBUTORS IN PERPETUITY.
https://cdn.satellite.earth/35a289ecf8a9514cf10cb548246fe6628ca5c9f8b301783ae79344e047c40134.mp4
Not asking for myself. But how could Satoshi himself have gotten any open source development support? Or an anonymous team doing for example, coinjoin/mixing, etc? We need an ecosystem that can support anonymous developers without them running away with it.
Monero is not only separated from the state. It’s separated from the entire economy at large. It is not separating The Money from the state tho. Monero is not The Money and never will. Bitcoin can be.



