bluesky’s definition of nazi is a bit different… I would venture to say this applies to the term violence as well

nostr:note1l23yw6g62pacra04qq9t5jqejsnyhmyy3xc3tv8pa2s26et9fhfsa994cp

I can imagine French authorities trying to track/stop protesters from organizing on Twitter. The interest in scraping massive amounts of data in real time seems obvious to me.

Gah! Not sure how to link the video itself. Summary: twitter scraping is how all of the AI is constructed that censors content across a whole range of platforms. By ending free scraping, intentionally or not, Elon is setting back the censorship industrial complex.

Two hours of waffle to prove he is only a camo shit poster. Psychopaths lost this war from the genesis block onwards.

Dude, unprofitable lightning nodes are a bit part of why lightning nodes are unprofitable. You're competing with people like me who don't care that their node loses money.

Correct, and one should expect unequal distribution under any system because individuals make their own choices and are proficient in different areas that are valued subjectively. Equal distribution for its own sake is inherently undesirable and all centrally planned regimes throughout history that have attempted redistribution of wealth have failed and had objectively worse standards of living. The difference is that in a free market the unequal distribution of resources will be based solely on free choices by individuals, not based on a coercion from a politburo

It would distribute the gains more evenly if people were already on a BTC standard. If only a small minority of people are using BTC, then the gains would not be spread more evenly.

Bitcoin is not debt, so it doesn’t rely on the issuance of more and more credit to keep it going. It’s hard money and it’s designed to always increase in purchasing power by the amount of productivity gains.

So yes, AI and Robots will dramatically reduce prices for good and services on a BTC standard, but our fiat brothers and sisters will be forced to pay higher prices because the fiat system cannot survive in a deflationary world. They need prices to continually rise. So this new AI era we are in should be very interesting.

Yes - only on a #Bitcoin standard will the productivity gains be distributed broadly. It will force governments to choose complete control of markets or to embrace free markets (ie - Bitcoin)

Two different versions and each person has a choice to live in the world they want. (But the transition will be chaotic because most will measure and reinforce the legacy system)

Why can’t someone participate in both worlds? I follow individuals who challenge my ideas, and when I’m tired, I seek refuge amongst my people. If I am aware of those dynamics, I get benefits from both.

Privileges of white supremacy.

Thank you, I appreciate the opportunity to discuss my perspective, and it is not that I am opposed to the idea of using digital currency to facilitate commerce. My concerns lie in the fact that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies offer little to no consumer protection. Virtual currencies are not backed by any country, are subject to significant price volatility, and have been used to finance scams and illicit activities.

Furthermore, digital currencies are not regulated by any central bank or government, which makes them dangerous for consumers. At their core, cryptocurrencies are a speculative asset that could lead to significant consumer harm if not managed carefully.

Finally, while Bitcoin may be the most well-known cryptocurrency, there are over 4,000 other virtual currencies and tokens in circulation, many of which have been created with fraudulent intent. These currencies have been associated with pump and dump schemes, scams, and other illegal activities.

It is for these reasons that I have taken a hardline stance on cryptocurrency, and I believe that it is important for regulators to take appropriate steps to protect consumers from the risks associated with these digital assets.