THEY WONT EVEN ASK.

Biden's situation is very interesting. Is this the first time the public is basically VETOing the selected candidate?

We should do more of this.

Everything you say in public will be recorded and remembered forever. We are all surveilled by the future, more so than even Caesars and prophets of old.

Your great-grandchildren will judge you for any intellectual dishonesty. Act accordingly.

Everything you say in public will be recorded and remembered forever. We are all surveilled by the future, more so than even Caesars and prophets of old.

Your great-grandchildren will judge you for any intellectual dishonesty. Act accordingly.

He’s changed his tune, not his mind.

Institutions are systems of control that tend to get corrupted when they amass too much power.

Organized religion is no exception.

One does not have to point out that we are free to argue because no one said you couldn’t. Me disagreeing with you is not oppression, it’s my own right to say that the original comment was bonkers. And sadly enough, it is because of that incredibly absurd but ferocious and violently held opinion that Trump is literally Hitler, that Trump is winning.

If the left didn’t want him to win, literally *all* they had to do was not be batshit crazy. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Now that we’ve moved the goal posts from “LITERALLY MOLLIONS WILL DIR” to “he said the election was stolen” I’ll take it you completely concede any and all slightly relevant points. However, you have made the same stupid mistake that I support him simply because I don’t think he’s trying to murder millions of people or enslave them in concentration camps.

Please go find a Trump supporter to leave your grievances with. If you think what the OP said is even slightly sane or that anything you shared here is evidence of it, you need a reality check. Sorry not sorry

So it's not okay to wish death on someone who wishes it on me, you, or our loved ones? And by extension, those who surround and support that person?

That's some super fucked thinking, but I think we all know what you're trying to actually say. 🙄

Would it have been okay to side with Stalin, Hitler, or Mao after failed assassination attempts like what's going on today? Why would you continue to support those who wish you didn't even exist?

Well gee whiz guys, their still /human/, even though they've killed millions and millions of people we still have to respect the sanctity of life.

If one's a tragedy, then a million's just a statistic, huh?

Tell me you didn’t watch the 10 seconds before and after that comment without telling me.

He was *literally* being sarcastic because of how people like you are constantly calling him a dictator. He is a doofus who is so easily pushing your buttons because of how unbelievably predictable you are.

During the 2016 election, I saw many LGBT+ people claiming Trump was going to put them in concentration camps. I saw people claiming he was a KKK member and was going to bring back the slavery of African Americans. I saw it all.

And none of it ever happened.

What did happen was we saw Trump not doing what he was told, good or bad, because sometimes it just made him look stupid (like the time he mocked a disabled person). None of which even remotely resembles any of those past evil dictators.

You just bought into the MSM lies and played yourself.

Tenacious D was doing a concert over the weekend and the other singer made a comment “don’t miss Trump next time” and the audience cheered. They’re facing a lot of backlash now over it.

Reporting news and advocating action are two different things. Trump is Hitler is not news. It isn't even true. Maga means Nazi is not news. It isn't even true. Yet it was reported on over and over again for years. They chose which pundits to give air time to. They choose which of the things they say to feature. Perhaps they 'call what they see'. If so, they are part of the problem.

Ethics discussions for decades have often centered around the question, "If you could go back and kill Hitler in the cradle would it be ethical to stop what happened?" The overwhelming answer is usually, 'of course. It seems to even be a moral imperative.'

Who does not know what we are being told when people call someone Hitler or a Nazi or a Fascist. "Punch a Nazi", meaning any political conservative (of which I am not one). When 'news' shows aired pundits who wished the knife attacker (assassination attempt) openly and publicly wished he had succeeded. Who does not know what we are being told when simple normal people are referred to as 'domestic terrorists' because they like a political candidate.

These things are not news. They are advocacy. Saturday someone did what they've been suggesting for YEARS. They killed one heroic father in the process. They, the reporters, the pundits, the leftist mud slingers.

I'm old enough to remember when "right wing radio" was criticized for talking as they did because it 'could' cause violence. Shoes on the other foot except it DID cause violence and death. Even though a heroic father is dead, and a president shot, pundits are still lamenting he didn't kill Trump and "news" is still giving it air time. That's advocacy.

Leftists want their political and cultural opponents dead. They talk this way for a reason. They don't get airtime if 'the news' doesn't think it's a good idea.

Maga's president is shot and look at all the riots in the streets. Oh wait..... there were none. While on the other hand the rhetoric leads to violence, riots and murder and the left calls it 'mostly peaceful' and some openly call for more of it. "Take it to the streets." "Get in their face." "They must be given room to destroy." Knowing full well that 'destroy' includes killing people. It's okay, the dead are folks they hated anyway.

Of course you have no idea what I'm talking about. Because it's the truth.