I don't think real work exercises grip more efficiently, it is just that you have to keep going for hours even after your hands and forearms have fatigued out. In a weight room you don't choose to endure that kind of pain. You don't choose it in the field or garage either. You just get the work done or you don't and don't isn't an option, so you push yourself so far past the breaking point that you can barely pick up a fork in the evening. Then you wake up a 5AM and do it again. There is no leg day.
Lol. That was also fun in college. Young men when meeting sometimes turn handshakes into grip contests. I'd let them think they were beating the skinny guy with tiny wrists then crunch their metacarpals.
That is gone now as well. Don't match grips with a farmer.
I have two of those #5 jack planes, but need a jointer and block plane. Nice collection!
Do all the non-negative roots of the Riemann Zeta function have a real part of 1/2?
Humourous story (for me). For most of my life I was a human stick. 6'4" 165lbs. Got teased a fair bit for being skinny. But I also grew up working on farms.
At the end of every year in college we were required to unbunk any beds in the dorms. A bodybuilder's roommate had already left for the summer so he asked me to help him unbunk his bed. They were pretty heavy and awkward and for whatever reason he couldn't get a proper hold to lift his end, so being annoyed I put the whole thing on my shoulders and did it by myself while he watched confused.
I was definitely not stronger, but a life spent doing actual physical work had unsurprisingly better prepared me to do actual physical work.
That being said I am now a dough boy who could stand to get back to doing manual labor.
"Misanthropes" is bringing out all the dictionaries.
That is why I am very particular about my potato chips. I simply refuse to eat them if they aren't within a short walk.
The question remains. How do you get the other goat as well.
True, that is why I added the "quite possibly." If, however, you look at "success" through an evolutionary lens things we don't get many excuses.
Things are nice and simple if you are a squirrel. Get as many offspring to reproductive maturity and you are a success! You have no control over genes and instincts will care for the rest.
If you are a human you get no such luck. You still have no control over the genes and you still have to trust to instincts, but people can make decisions about things. Thus we have to also replicate the ideals that led us to have children. That is a tricky business and is fraught with a million ways to fail especially since they will also take in information from the culture and in the end will decide for themselves.
So with humans replicating genes isn't enough for success. We don't know if ideals have replicated till our kids start raising their kids the way we raised them.
We can Intuit that just having a bunch of kids isn't enough for evolutionary success among humans. Everyone probably knows some big family that inexplicably (or perhaps very explicably) didn't result in many grandkids. Contrariwise, there are only children who went on to be the start of a large thriving clan.
The complicating factor is that we aren't just individuals, we are functional parts of society. Our ideals can live on even if we are unable to have any or many children of our own. This is a huge function of priests and religious. They may not have children of their own, but they help perpetuate the purest form of societal ideals that allow us to thrive.
Well I kinda do. I am the full-time house-husband, but I have been honest that my wife would probably do a better job. If you want your kids raised right you can't farm it out. Then once the kids are grown you transition into helping them with their kids. If they don't have or want kids, then quite possibly you didn't raise them right.

schnorr signatures solve the malleability problem
so how did segwit help lightning?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/u9gya5/why_lightning_network_is_only_compatible_with/

by eliminating malleability
if bitcoin had schnorr signatures this would have been solved for lightning, and we'd still have 1Mb blocks, instead fo kinda 4mb blocks, but really still 1mb we promise
anyone who thinks they know about bitcoin who doesn't understand this most fundamental issue about the signature algorithm and segwit and lightning should be ashamed of themselves
I am confused as to whether I should be ashamed of myself. I don't understand this fundemental issue, but I also don't claim to understand Bitcoin. At least not at a cryptographic primitive level.
But I love most of the software who's icons appear in the image so now I want to know what the square with the feather is so I can try that too.
Yes! Arc all the things! Because you know whatever you want to pass contains an object from a library that does not impl clone.
I will freely admit that I don't use lifetimes because I haven't taken the time to understand them yet. It never makes sense to me. Everything the compiler complains about seems to want a static lifetime.
That and rust macros. Does anyone read macros? Luckily one can write rust without lifetimes and macros it is just a pain. Just not as much of a pain as using them.
I envy the fiber. I built a home office in my basement 5 years ago and like an idiot I put a pair of rj45 jacks with cat6 next to every outlet without putting it in conduit so I could upgrade. Realistically I'll be fine, they are all short runs in a low noise environment. I should be able to push it well past 10g. But still... Should have used conduit.


