Avatar
AbsurdZugzwang
75f00a4aa9f286efe7e90cfcd5e1784c3ad2b096d680b02b4be06b3078cb6425
I rebel - therefore we exist

I’m in Australia: we had a telecommunications business run by the government (Telstra) it was privatised in 1974 and became a monopoly, so in 1989 the government legislated that another telecommunications company (Optus) could use the infrastructure that the government have sold to telstra then we had a duopoly. Then the government built our national broadband network and now we have viable competition in the Telecommunications market with more players like vodaphone and ISP options. How would a laissez-faire market do a better job of creating competition in this situation?

How does the nation-state protect shareholder’s? It is often the government that steps in to break up monopolies. Rich people know how to make money, form a monopoly corporation with the other rich people and exploit the workers.

Interesting proposal: Voluntary welfare contributions. How do you see funding for infrastructure, tax or also voluntary?

Is Nietzsche’s Übermensch a valid response to the Absurd?

Did you “maybe learn” because I asked a question? Was that really necessary?

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

Will we even notice when the line is crossed?

I don’t get what it is. I just saw a bunch of images going by. Please explain, thank you.

Are you old enough to remember Everybody Love Raymond? If not give it a try, might help you laugh at the situation.

Ayn Rand says “Reason is man’s only means of grasping reality and of acquiring knowledge” but Camus advocates for “facts the heart can feel” how would you reconcile these views in order to blend Absurdism and Objectivism?

Yes rebellion against the absurd is a key component of absurdist theory, but rebellion is against the lack of purpose and meaning not against physics or science. Why should my rebellion conflict with objectivism?

Is Absurdism compatible with objectivism? I certainly see absurdism as fitting more with Aristotle and existentialism than with Plato and the abstract forms, but can it be blended with objectivism? The idea that the universe of the cat is different to the universe of people is very post modern, but Camus also says that “The absurd is lucid reason noting its limits.” This seems to adhere with objectivist commitment to reason. What do you think Nostriches?