The book Enoch was not considered canon in Judaism nor pre-schism Christianity. It's not in the Septuagint, for example, the Scriptures that Jesus quotes in the four gospels.

That doesn't mean it's not interesting or not useful, but it is not normative. There doesn't seem to have been a conspiracy to stamp it out, no conspiracy, it simply wasn't considered canon so it wasn't propagated.

I see a couple of Ethiopian churches have a larger set of scriptures and they include it. That does not elevate it to the status of the Torah or New Testament.

Which are these famous sayings of Jesus that quote from Enoch? Or are you referring to other extra-biblical books here too?

Example running it locally. Yes, I had to walk away for a while before it finally reached the conclusion. However, unlike llama this one is free/libre.

ollama run deepseek-r1:7b

>>> Can you translate the following text from German to English for me? Reddit g

... eht nun auch nict via VPN?

Alright, let's tackle this translation request. The user wants to

translate "Reddit geht nun auch nicht via VPN?" from German to English.

First off, I need to understand each part of the sentence. "Reddit geht

nun auch nicht" means something like "Now Reddit also doesn't." But that

doesn't quite make sense in context. Maybe it's trying to say that Reddit

is now blocking access through a VPN? So perhaps translating as "Now

Reddit also blocks access via VPN?" would make more sense.

Then, the question mark at the end indicates it's an actual query or a

statement, not just a simple sentence. The user might be asking if Reddit

has started blocking VPN traffic, so I should ensure that my translation

reflects that uncertainty or definitiveness as appropriate.

I also need to consider the current context around Reddit and VPNs. As of

my knowledge cutoff in July 2024, Reddit had already rolled out a feature

that prevents accessing certain content through VPNs. This might have been

updated recently, so I should check if there's any recent information

about changes in their policies.

Additionally, the structure of the sentence is important. In German,

"nicht" can mean both "not" and "without." Translating it as "doesn't

allow access via VPN" sounds more accurate than a literal translation

which might imply that it went away or something similar.

Lastly, I should present the translation clearly so that the user

understands that Reddit has made changes regarding VPN access. It's also

good to offer further help in case they need more information.

Reddit now also doesn't allow access via VPN? (As of July 2024, Reddit had

already rolled out a feature that prevents accessing certain content

through VPNs.)

>>> Translate the following English sentence to German: I apologize if respondin

... g in English was rude, please inform me if such responses are not welcome.

Alright, let's dive into this translation request. The user wants to

translate an English sentence to German: "I apologize if responding in

English was rude, please inform me if such responses are not welcome."

First, I'll break down the original sentence to ensure each part is

accurately captured in German.

1. **"I apologize if responding in English was rude."**

- This expresses a reason for replying in English and acknowledges any

perceived rudeness of doing so.

- In German, "Ich apporte pen Leslie, wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und

das klingt schlimm."

2. **"please inform me if such responses are not welcome."**

- This is a polite request to clarify or objectify the form of response

provided.

- In German: " Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht

erwünscht sind."

Now, combining these parts into a coherent German sentence:

"I apologize if responding in English was rude, please inform me if such

responses are not welcome."

Becomes:

"Ich apporte pen Leslie, wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt

schlimm. Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht

sind."

I'll also consider the context in which this sentence might be used. It

seems to be a response that someone might use when they decide to

communicate in a language other than their native one, possibly due to

cultural or personal reasons.

Another point of consideration is the choice of words for "apologize."

While "Ich apporte pen" directly translates from the structure of the

original English sentence, using "ichrede pen" could be more appropriate

and idiomatic in German.

Additionally, I'll ensure that the sentence flows naturally in German. The

phrase "wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm" conveys both

apology for replying in another language and acknowledgment of it being

unacceptable.

Finally, I'll make sure to offer further assistance if needed.

Sure! Here's the translation:

"Ichrede pen Leslie, wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm.

Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht sind."

Let me know if you need anything else! 😊

>>> Can you please translate the following sentence from German to English? Ichr

... ede pen Leslie, wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm.

... Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht sind.

Alright, let's tackle this translation request step by step. The user has

provided a German sentence and wants it translated to English.

First, I'll look at the original sentence:

"ICHREDE PENS LESLIE, Wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm.

Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht sind."

This seems to be a response that someone might use when replying in

another language they find unacceptable.

Breaking it down:

1. **"ICHREDE PENS LESLIE"**

This part is a bit unclear. "Ichrede pen" could mean "I apologize

if...". However, the structure and word order don't align perfectly with

standard German sentence structures.

2. **"Wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm."**

Translates to "If I respond in English and it sounds rude."

3. **"Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht

sind."**

Translates to "Please confirm if these responses are not welcome."

Combining these elements into a coherent English sentence:

"I apologize if responding in English was rude. Please inform me if such

responses are not welcomed."

I'll also ensure the translation maintains the tone and intent of the

original German phrase.

Let me know if further adjustments are needed! 😊

Interesting stuff. It's not your ordinary biblical text because it's literally extra-biblical: outside the Bible. But I think Saint Peter alludes to it in one example of the judgment.

Ichrede pen Leslie, wenn ich auf Englisch rufe und das klingt schlimm. Bitte berätigen Sie mich, wenn diese Antworten nicht erwünscht sind.

StARRRRlink.

What's a pirate's favorite internet service provider?

I think it depends on the (reported spam?) state of the exact VPN exit. I just visited via a VPN and I could read fine, on desktop browser. IDK about the mobile app but I would guess it's the same situation.

It is more challenging than I expected to find two of each that actually show events and let me publish there.

I really doubt it extrapolates like that, though.

I only follow 46 right now, but if I understand correctly, combined they use 17 relays. If that extrapolates to 4600 using 1700 relays that's great. It is possible given that my client has seen upwards of 1500 relays. Several are direct IP addresses, several are onion, and that's encouraging. Suppose we all configured two IP address relays (no domain name) and two onion relays.

That is the hope. Until everybody who was using those reconfigures there would be some loss, I guess. Who knows how long that would take? Suppose we used a nostr chaos monkey that monitors popularity of relays and randomly suggests those relays to take themselves down for a time to see what happens. Maybe it's already chaotic enough that we're OK. I speculate.

Easiest would probably be DNS takedowns of the top 25 relays. That's not outlawing but it would disrupt.

Oh, I missed the part about deepseek r1 havng some fully free/libre versions based on qwen.

Probably was me in this note:

nostr:nevent1qqsqqqqqqafezt43pzg0g69zsa6apa9u498f0lpq7q9qyzxr3ehp69spzpmhxue69uhkztnwdaejumr0dshsz8mhwden5te0dehhxarj95crytnydaexzenpvd6x7une9ehhyee0qy38wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttjv4kxz7fwwd3ksmnfw3ax2mpwwahhymry9uc8kkg5

I saw something that said the author imagined coverage upwards of 90% of arrests but I think your story suggests it only scratched the surface.

How much is a global conspiracy against unapproved money and how much is a global conspiracy against unapproved drugs may be hard to disentangle. The root of it is, I suppose, a global conspiracy against human rights and unapproved activities generally. I still wonder if there was a specific bitcoin angle.

The code that produced the model is free/libre but the model itself is proprietary.

Without having watched: yes. His administration did it before and they will do it again. I hope I'm wrong but let's be realistic.

Suppose you succeed in defending yourself. Then what?

Easy to say, hard to do.

I misunderstood one of your emoji. I don't know much about lightning. What is the tradeoff they are doing here by limiting channel capacity? Why wouldn't a channel limit by default be "all the bitcoin"? Or is there some other constraint I don't understand?

Re-reading it and with this context, I now understand "directly" means "they accept LN" rather than "you have to use some other proxy service to buy Mullvad credits with LN." I don't know how lightning works and haven't tried it so my comment is mostly ignorance about lightning.