Avatar
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ whoever loves Digit
7776c32d4b1d1e8bf2a96babeb43ad9ade157bd363d89b87fb63e6f145558888
Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe. To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.

I can only give warnings, not recommendations, in this area, because phones suck these days.

My warning for DivestOS is what I was saying about single-party accountability - if you have any sensitive data on your phone, and that data gets in the wrong hands, your response is disadvantaged by not knowing if the leak came from the maker of your phone or the maker of the OS.

That said, you can still use DivestOS to adopt alternatives for Google software and strongly signal to Google that you're so done with their shit, you are ONLY using a pixel because it has the third-party support.

Where the fuck did your train of thought come from here? I have definitely never heard an executive at a corporation say what I'm saying, and I guarantee you haven't either, and neither has any audio recording on the internet because it's not the type of shit corporate executives say.

You basically openly admit your opinions are based on selfishness and greed ("I own property" - so you think, hooray for you) so I didn't really read your post

Can you phrase your point in a quicker to read way?

That's very sad but I'm still not quite sure what you're telling me

I'm anti-war too, generally, but wasn't Lincoln probably too?

My point is, you can recognize times where violence is needed. But I highly respect how strong your instinct is to avoid it and protect people

What do you think of Abe Lincoln? I say if he lived forever he might regret being so brutal and believe there were lives that could have been saved, but he fought a fight that did need to be fought

Replying to Avatar BoomTown

Will nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m & MicroStrategy ever choose to buy back their own stock rather to induce a massive short squeeze rather than stack bitcoin?

Why? Just short squeeze Bitcoin itself instead

Have read about half the thread and it all further solidifies my opinion that the ideas being discussed in that thread are over-complicating something that can be much simpler.

If anyone wants to give a direct explanation of what I'm missing, I'm open to it.

Otherwise, it seems to me the best path to functionality right now would start with adding 1 field, then maybe a second and third could be added later.

Nah. People developing curation systems that don't make sense are trying to force tradeoffs on me. I'm just gonna run trustworthy npubs and systems that don't work will not recognize my npubs as trustworthy and systems that work well will be good at recognizing my npubs as trustworthy.