Avatar
Cyber Seagull
77953b3a63bcf1c748dbdeef109bd56de48c30edcd27d2092440c3adca31c975
Tiramisu. God. Bitcoin. Drivechain. In that order.

By the way, apparently the 42 limit standard is his version, not cores. The standard he's talking about is his series of patches he has been advocating for merging to core for several years.

Not so much lying, as being zealous.

This distinction might be damage control though.

In the #startrek universe, what is the most important technology ? Examples: Warp, Matter converters, phasers....

Correct answer wins 500 sats.

That's just a reflection of your own follow thread. Add a new account and add people from global who are not bitcoiners. There are tons. Artists, creatives, writters, religious, cranks. It's all there.

Freedom entails responsibility, if you are not adjusting the signal you are receiving in a constructive way, such as subcribing to people you disagree with. That's on you.

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Some extremely reliable facts that don’t get mentioned because ā€œMuh NaRrAtiVEā€ā€¦

Did you know?

• CO2, even as a greenhouse gas, has a declining marginal return on its effect? In other words, we have to double the CO2 concentration to have the same potential greenhouse effect.

— In other words, It’s like the bitcoin supply, only the first few halvings (or doublings for CO2) are meaningful in the supply change (or with CO2, the greenhouse effect change). After that it’s negligible.

— in other, other words, IF it has actually made the planet measurably warmer, we’ve already seen the overwhelming majority of any warming we will see?

• That CO2 is a *lagging* indicator of temperature historically, not a *leading* one?

• That the most reliable connection with CO2 levels and historical samples is a massive flourishing of life?

• At the end of the 1800s, CO2 concentration was in the 200 PPM range, and now it’s closer to 400 PPM. Wow! Thats scary huh? Except - 200 PPM is actually a multi million year LOW in CO2 levels and that the very ability for our planet to support plant life… and thus life at all at 150 or below is at risk. While on the other hand, the periods where life was literally exploding on earth (the literal Cambrian explosion and others) CO2 levels were in the 5,000-8,000 PPM range? That the AVERAGE is even something around 5k if I remember correctly? Something comically infeasible from merely burning fossil fuels?

— in other words, we were actually in such a horrible historical low in concentration that we were closer to a planet where life at all could have been unsustainable due to a LACK of CO2?

• That deaths and risks related to climate and weather have done nothing but plummet (like seriously drop like a rock, looks like the dollar value chart) for an entire century and are expected to do nothing but continue to plummet?

• That like 90% or more of weather/climate related deaths are because it’s too fucking cold?

• That for any honest view of the data: IF it should be expected that CO2 will alone actually cause a sustained warmer planet, that this just means more life, a healthier environment, higher crop yields, fewer weather related deaths, and that contrary to it causing a disaster, it’s more likely to have *averted* one?

You’re welcome 😚

Also the ipcc report everyone freaks out about is only 1% temp increase over the next 100 years. Run for the hills

I am only aware of one that refills, and wikipedia claimed it may be filling from a different nearby reserve.

Nonetheless, it was once claimed that literal dinosaur flesh and bones under pressure from soil lead to oil, thus the "fossil" part. Then plankton (which also lead to limestone under different conditions somehow.)

One thing is for sure, oil is plentyful and keeps being found everwhere. Mostly wherever it's convenient for U.S foreign policy.

As long as we support relays and creators and the best posts with zaps, I see no reason to dumb down nostr, even for it to survive. Sure UX and the protocol can improve and always is. But a supportive, intelligent niche userbase is a legitimate long term survival strategy. K versus R selection.

We don't really need to repeat the eternal september of the internet in Nostr to succeed.

Your facebook, twitter, reddit friends can stay where they are, interact with them there, keeping the quality of signal high on Nostr.

Reducing blocksize and op_codes, ossification, and pushing them a L2 is also improvement.

Anything else, even status quo, is inviting core devs to "accidentaly make a mistake" as Will put it so candidly recently, by one day introducing something with unintended consequences that need continual patches.

Luke has answered this elsewhere. It's unfortunate his positions on specific topics aren't indexed somewhere that he can just reference by code.

His position is that from inception the field was standardized at 40 bytes, intentionally to limit spam. So reliance on and design around an expanded field size is a mistake on their end, for non-conforming to the "spec".

Things like this in protocols tend to be worked out by representative bodies and industry boards such as w3c, iso, among others over time. These standards also tend to compete for adoption.

Bitcoin being money, a new project and a philosophical or religious paradigm shift for participants, with enourmous social consequences, it will take a while to smooth out the standard.

Spain wouldn't even be "rich" without Islam, so no....

Turkey is rich despite christian european "peace", which is just another word for economic aggresion

Is this some sort of joke i'm too Nostr to understand.

Finally. I can be in on the no context musings and out-of-the-blue observations. (Not sarcasm)

Reading vague inside jokes and quips by fiatjaf that they will never expand on again is mentally overwhelming for ME.

I look forward to it. I doubt a rational discussion will ever convince that particular underwear stain of anything. Only a stroke at 65 will unblock the plaque in his brain. He will suddenly endorse bip300, but by then it will be too late.

This criticism is based only on the block history size. It is quite large compared to bitcoi n. Otherwise it can scale well. It has varriable blocksize to keep fees low, and super easy node deploy.