„Bitcoin. Going to zero since 2009.”

That’s the joke, right?

Every cycle, the same clowns repeat it.

Every cycle, Bitcoin obliterates their narrative.

2009: Worthless internet money.

2013: A bubble that popped.

2017: Tulips 2.0.

2021: A Ponzi scheme.

2025: Still here. Stronger than ever.

Over 1,000 obituaries later, Bitcoin is the most secure monetary network humanity has ever built. While fiat currencies rot away and altcoins rug their own holders, Bitcoin keeps doing exactly what it was designed to do:

✔️ Run 24/7 with no downtime

✔️ Protect wealth with unbreakable math

✔️ Stay incorruptible by politicians, bankers, or insiders

The joke isn’t on Bitcoin.

It’s on everyone who dismissed it.

Stack sats. Stay savage. Watch zero never come.

Hitting $1M per #Bitcoin? Not if but when.

The #Bitcoin journey 👇

by @14g23h34

🧵Let's talk about Marxist Inversion in BTC:

This is a thread on my observations of the core versus knots debate as an outsider.

Every organization, company or institution WILL have to contend with those that try to invert its original purpose (Marxists).

To understand why I call them that you must let go of the idea that Marxism exists only as a political system and see it instead as a worldview.

Marxism can exist in your bookclub your Pilates group or your Tech startup.

The motivation is simple:

The established order allows for little personal advancement.

Preventing scope creep and organizational drift is not censorship, it is conservation.

It is the immune system of the existing identity against dilution of purpose. Marxists coopt an existing body/identity and invert its original purpose to create a blue ocean; a new market to expand their personal influence or wealth.

By INVERTING the original purpose they borrow credibility from the existing reputation and user base while forwarding their new goals.

Examples:

●When politicians focus more on foreign interests than its citizens. (NGOs, Wars)

●When game developers stop producing entertaining games that the fan base wants in favor of their personal ideologies (gamergate)

●When a CEO diverts resources in favor of ulterior motives forcing organizational drift. (Disney, Budlight)

●When Universities focus on politics and influence peddling over education. (endowments, government research, DEI patronage jobs)

●When regulators act as gatekeepers and corporate tollbooths instead of serving the public (FDA, NIH, SEC)

●When news organizations focus on coordinating narratives over reporting events (all of them)

●When Developers expand the scope of Bitcoin beyond a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Marxist tactics:

Marxism attacks organizations in three primary ways.

Leadership:

In a company they typically target the founders for removal by involving them in scandal. Founders have Sweat Equity and care about an organization more than an average employee. They are the only ones willing to risk their career to resist. This is why Elon Musk was attacked so strongly.

Thankfully Bitcoin is immune to this because Bitcoin has no centralized founders.

Identity destruction:

Marxism views traditional identities as obstacles to be overturned in Revolution. This can be something banal like a company communication policy or as grandiose as gender.

Regardless, the “current thing” must change because progress demands it. And through the system of Marxist gradualism (never ending nibbles of change) they boil the frogs, or in this case the plebs.

Many people wouldn't identify themselves as marxists or even understand what it is, but they run the code.

Normie NPC American has been deeply indoctrinated by Marxism through popular culture for decades.

If someone is consistently attempting to overturn established standars, traditions or identities you have a revolutionary Marxist on your hands.

Bitcoins identity as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system stands in the way of the new identity they want for Bitcoin.

By introducing an endless string of small new features and changes Bitcoins identity will be slowly diluted and inverted to serve a new selfish purpose.

Think about a startup that wanted to create a singular good product but every Director and VP introduced their own pet project and eventually scope creep dilutes the identity of the brand.

Something that is everything is also nothing because it lacks a singular identity and purpose to be defended above all others.

Bitcoin's identity as hard MONEY must be defended because that is the ONLY vector marxists have to attack it.

Culture comes from Identity. What we do comes from who we are and what we believe as bitcoiners.

If they can't change Bitcoins identity and culture they lose.

Bitcoin is conservative:

I often hear the argument made that Bitcoin is libertarian, but Bitcoin is also the most conservative asset ever to exist.

21 million forever, no free rides, proof of work only.

I don't use conservative in the mainstream political sense. I use it in the form of Conservation of Natural Resources.

●Of preventing the tragedy of the commons.

●Of preserving the current over endless performative progress.

●Saving for the future instead of spending in the now.

●Discouraging debt and encouraging quality.

These are all ideals of a conservative culture. It is no accident that so many bitcoiners identify Bitcoin as the Christian ideal of money.

Bitcoin is conservative Fiat is Progressive.

I like Libertarians but Marxists know Libertarians can't defend themselves, and this is why so many marxists masquerade as Libertarians (parasitism, inversion).

Why? because from the libertarian perspective any defense can be inverted as an offense.

“Don't censor my peer-peer porn coin or you're being authoritarian!”

Marxists use the same tactic on Christians:

“Why are you defending christianity? You're not allowed to defend yourself, Jesus said turn the other cheek!”

Make no apologies for conserving and defending an existing identity.

Defending WHAT CURRENTLY IS is never an offensive act.

Bitcoins identity as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system must be conserved.

Marxists attack language:

Marxism is ego based and parasitic. Because of this Marxists will lie or use euphemisms to smuggle their actions inside of a moral framework.

Euphemism: "Your promoting censorship"

Translation: "You are impeding my will"

"Censorship" is only the body they use to incubate their Marxist actions. Once their goals are achieved they would dispense with it. The true meaning of the word censorship is irrelevant.

Remember, their primary attack is on identity, they attack the identity of THE WORD censorship and reform it for their own uses.

You will recognize examples of this vocabulary destruction in culture war topics:

Fat -> Fat Bodied,

Homeless -> The Unhoused, Breastfeeding -> Chestfeeding, Mother -> Birthing person.

By destroying the language they are fighting on a meta level. They cannot win on the principles of their arguments and so they attack the rules of the game itself.

You must recognize the bait and switch semantic word game being played.

In conclusion:

I forget who referred to Marxism as a “series of bitch moves” but that's the best way to understand how they think and act.

They won't and can't fight fair or stand on principle because they have an immoral ideology and they don't have those skills.

Instead of listening to market feedback they will abuse your nodes. When caught they will laugh and downplay their abuse or attempt to INVERT the morality:

“If all it took was to attack some nodes to trigger the knotzis, then knots must be pretty retarded”

or,

“good luck trying to stop me from raping your node with spam and jpegs”

The translation is:

“it's your fault that you're upset by my bad behavior and I'm going to intentionally be worse”

If all other tactics fail they default to credentialism.

The appeal to Authority we saw during covid lockdowns by governments and regulators is the perfect example.

“Trust the science, trust the experts, trust the devs...”

“Knots is only one person! vs. an entire team of professionals”

(Lie, appeal to authority)

Bitcoin doesn't need a Priestly class. Bitcoin is for the plebs.

Who am I to tell you this? I'm not a developer nor am I a technical bitcoiner.

I am an Orthodox Christian that has seen this Marxist pattern play out across 20 years of working with startups, corporates and governments and I am extremely good at spotting marxists.

I don't doubt that my sweeping generality doesn't apply to every core developer, but I am confident that what we have at Core is a Marxist attack on bitcoin because they're using the Marxist playbook.

Bitcoin is truth and Marxists are incapable of telling it.

Stick to the truth.

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Conserve it, protect it.

Filtering spam is censorship, but banning Knots nodes is not.

Do you realize that? It's so obvious now.

What about the commissions from Citrea, Lopp?

Gm.

What’s your favorite movie made in the past five years?

Wow.

I created a Facebook account just now to see what's available on marketplace. They somehow figured out my real name and birthday based on the email address (different one than the one I used back when I had an account many years ago) and when I tried to delete the account, it keeps saying that the password is wrong (despite it being fine for logging in). What sort of dystopian nightmare is this?

90%+ of eth is owned by insiders. 90%+ of tron is owned by sun. 90%+ of bnb is owned by cz and binance. see the pattern? buy the fucking orange coin then will ya.

NEW: The 🇺🇸 U.S. Justice Department says it will not target software developers who create decentralized crypto platforms without criminal intent, signaling a shift in its enforcement approach.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti stated that merely writing code isn’t a crime, and the DOJ will no longer pursue charges solely for failing to register as a money transmitter. 🙌

Ich glaube nicht an eine langfristig erfolgreiche Schweiz. Leider. Sozialistische Bewegungen haben auch dieses Land unterwandert. Die SNB selbst ähnelt eher einem Spielcasino als einer seriösen Institution. Der Geldsozialismus und der angefachte Cantillon Effekt werden dem Land langfristig schaden und Menschen gegeneinander aufhetzen. 😢

Study #bitcoin

Yes yes, 2.2m is in play, but when?

Some days I feel like I'm too bearish...

Others I feel like I'm too bullish 😅

Go read the defintion of Fungible then come back. It has nothing to do with tracking, tainting, marking, or subjective observations. There are no low satoshis or high satoshis or red satoshis or blue satoshis or tainted satoshis. There are only Satoshis which are ALL equal and interchangable with no difference realized on the Bitcoin network. Every transaction melts Satoshi's, not just coinjoins. Coinjoins only purpose is to obfuscate address ownership. This has nothing to do with fungibility. Don't trust me though, go look up the definition of fungible. It is not possible to identify and block any satoshis.

💣

#bitcoin

What about the non-fungibility of bitcoin? Is this a concern? On top of the KYC, non-KYC types, we now have another form of censorship on our hands don't we?

People are bearish at 112 thousand dollars for one coin

Probably the most bullish I’ve felt in a while

Higher

He signed over his 30k BTC to Wall Street for paper promises. They didn't even have to pay spot.

I will not fall into the fallacy of the false dilemma or the fallacy of authority.

Adam stands with Cantor Fitzgerald.

Technocratic totalitarianism is rolled out right in front of our eyes, all across the globe.

The proof-of-work difficulty is adjusted every 2016 blocks to keep the average time between new blocks at ten minutes.

— Satoshi Nakamoto

Has the double spending been confirmed?