Worth getting the smoker out for 2 or 3 dozen eggs or throw some on after smoking something else 🍻
That sounds really good
I look forward to trying it. I'll let them plie up a couple days to get a couple dozen.
I'm getting 7-9 eggs per day. Going to need to be creative if I want to keep eating them
Purple dead nettle tea is a great antihistamine. You may find it in or around lawns. 
My brother smoked some eggs. Eggs go on smoker raw. They are smoked until cooked like a hard boiled egg. Since the shell is permiable, some of the smokey flavor makes it in.
Next time I think I will try a lower temperature to try and get more smoke flavor. I want to experiment making deviled eggs this way.
What flavors would you try to work in? I think sriracha and sweet relish would pair well with the smokiness.
#foodstr #chickens #eggs #grownostr
This is the first time I've heard of him. Anyone calling calling themselves professor online has my bs detector going off
I just watched the first video in that series. It is pretty good. The production is great and it is entertaining enough I don't think it will be too bad working through it
Do you recommend anything in particular? Should I just search for his stuff? Is he in any podcasts?
According to the 'experts', you should be 😂
The amount of people blindly worshiping this guy baffles me. 'He's into freedom now, not censoring, trust him with his non descript 'human rights'
I can see that, I also wish I could fly 😥😋
What version of somewhere over the rainbow do you like? I like Taco's rendition.
Thanks, I didn't know the name
I would guess because this was composed to get an emotional response.
I would prefer to not be should upon when joining
Yes, this would be a difficult thing to figure out
No idea who these people are or what 'human rights' they are advocating.
This just seems like 'look at me, I'm totally not into censoring anymore. Trust me, I like freedom'
Peer review could potentially be useful, if it was not controlled. I would love to see a nostr based platform for submitting scientific studies and white papers. Anyone could 'peer review' these studies to point out where they are not sound and expose funding.
Would need work and could be abused, just a quick thought. Maybe people with verified qualifications would have more 'weight' to their reviews. 🤔
As it is now, peer review is a poor stand in for reproducing the results of a study or experiment. How many studies are not reviewed because they do not involve carbon or cow farts as a cause for climate change?