Avatar
Moritz Bierling
7db37a34cf53e934daaee535d2332ae4ab6b0377ea38b925a87d9075e29cf6a1
Vice President of the Natural Law Institute. Writing a book on how to get into the fight for our civilization.

Modern Minuteman CAMPAIGN is now LIVE!

https://modernminuteman.net/

Replit really is awesome

Would love to see a bit more documentation or explainer info on it. I don't really know what it is or how it works, given that the GitHub and website say little more than a phrase. :D

I’m not sure as to the latest on that front but you can ask them in their discord!

Testing whether these posts show up in my ow relay now

Why are Roman Catholic alignments a hindrance?

Replying to Avatar Rusty

Meta Raybans are basically a combination of eyeglasses, a camera, and a Bluetooth headset.

Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses use a dual-band WiFi antenna that supports both 2.4 GHz & 5 GHz WiFi networks aswell as Bluetooth 5.0 (at 2.4 GHz) allowing it to connect to both WiFi and Bluetooth networks/devices.

Airpods use W1 or H1 Bluetooth chip which uses just Bluetooth at 2.4 GHz

With headphones, you can take them off and put them in a bag anytime you like, but it’s not the same with prescription glasses.

Wearing them all day is not a matter of choice. And with smart glasses, you’ll most likely keep them connected to your phone. And exposing yourself – especially your brain – to that much EMF and for that long a time can result in severe EMF-induced health problems.

Besides that, your eyes are also particularly vulnerable to damage from EMF exposure. So, when you wear smart glasses all day, their EMF emissions can cause damage to your eyes.

PMID: 19517034

PMID: 30226071

PMID: 2488031

In May 2004, Dr. Lai and Singh published a groundbreaking study that confirmed the link between prolonged EMF exposure and DNA damage.

ehp.niehs.nih (dot) gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.6355

They did a series of experiments between 1994 and 1998 to determine if the supposedly “safe” doses of non-ionizing EMF radiation caused DNA damage.

What exactly is DNA damage?

Per researchers Kaufmann and Paules: “DNA damage is defined as an alteration in DNA structure that is capable of causing cellular injury and reduces viability or reproductive fitness of the organism.”

In simple words, human DNA contains two strands, which contain information passed down from generations. If there’s damage to it, the individual will suffer from a range of problems, including unnatural cell death, premature aging, and inability to reproduce.

Lai & Singh in their research found that EMF-induced DNA damage begins after two hours of exposure. Imagine what a full day of exposure, and that too daily, from Ray-Ban smartglasses can do.

doi (dot) org/10.1002/bem.2250160309

Researchers from Lund University, Sweden, studied EMF’s effect on the blood-brain-barrier for ten years. Their study found that constant EMF exposure from common sources like cell phones, laptops, tablets, WiFi routers, and smart meters loosens the blood-brain barrier’s integrity.

The blood-brain barrier, or BBB, is a wall that keeps unnecessary fluids away from your brain. If it’s not functioning as it’s supposed to, fluids like albumin can easily enter the brain, leading to problems like epilepsy and multiple sclerosis.

Besides weakening your BBB, EMF exposure has also been known to cause other neurological problems like:

— Impaired learning and memory

— Constant migraines

— Massive changes in sleep habits

— And neurological cognitive disorders like dizziness, tremors, depressive symptoms, loss of concentration, and loss of memory.

All smart wearable devices rely on wireless technologies to provide you with their fancy features and services. This means their EMF emissions will be the same as well as the EMF-induced health effects.

tl;dr

They all are the same with close proximity to the head. I wouldn't use none of them.

Gotta fry that brain and those eyes at the same time

One might even say it is required to be an asshole and it’s the nature of the people you’re around and environment you’re in that dictates how often and how intensely.

Replying to Avatar Moritz Bierling

Love has nothing, zero, nada to do with being nice.

Love is all about discrimination: separating the good from the bad, choosing the good, and enacting it.

With "the good" aiming at long term ethical flourishing, not politeness or "look at me" gestures.

To do it well requires knowledge, discernment, effort.

You don't love your child by serving unlimited candy and iPads.

You don't love your spouse by refusing to confront them about their abuse of service staff.

You don't love your people by indulging their fanciful notions in politics.

No.

You love them by doing what's right and being prepared to stand by your convictions in the face of opposition and loss.

To do that, you must A) actually be motivated by love, and B) know what's right.

A is mostly a (difficult) decision, and the continuous recommitment to that decision when it is inevitably tested and found wanting.

B is just as difficult: it requires said knowledge, discernment, and effort. You need a system of measurement appropriate to the domain you're acting in and you better know both the limits of that system and your own limits in applying it.

I sometimes say that "moral certainty is the most prized possession in the world".

People will kill to get and keep it, and they will kill in its name. Providing it is a dangerous game, especially at scale.

This is the terrifying power that "scribblers" hold: to walk people through the depths of their own soul and convince them that this makes them angels.

It is why prophets and innovators are persecuted always. Not because they are right in their pronouncements (although they very well may be), but because they manufacture an alternate source of moral authority.

And with everything invested in the status quo, "they" can't have that.

Because where there is moral authority, people and their resources inevitably follow.

This should be a profoundly encouraging message for you if you understand it.

It means that in a time of degeneracy and decay, instead of groveling for a job or handout at the feet of pharisees, you can do difficult things that test your resolve, call out evil, and grow a collective capable of overcoming it.

Now, few will do so — power laws are in everything and the risks are real.

But the ones who do and succeed?

They will inherit the earth.

Thanks nostr:nprofile1qqsph6fjv9504a84auv8wz43v0lzcf4uqjwjz2vpscmhehqr80mfv9qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds8z0w95 !

Ever heard of the creative process?

I learned its power from Robert Fritz after my friend Nick introduced me to his work.

The basic pitch is simple: professional creators don’t rely on flimsy inspiration for their creations.

Instead, they:

1. articulate the outcome,

2. take stock of current reality, and then

3. take action to close the gap between the two.

It’s so deceptively simple and yet so incredibly powerful.

Since learning this, my creative output has grown immensely.

I’ve organized a course, started working out consistently, strengthened my relationship, executed a couple of professional projects, and more.

I even created my own card deck to assist in creating something using the creative process (pics attached).

I’m curious: what has held you back from creating the outcomes you want? What if all the huffing and puffing in the process wasn’t necessary? Do you really want the outcome or do you prefer being perceived as creative?

The Old Continent (Europe) plus the areas with historically majority European ethnic populations

If you're an ambitious man in the Extended European Habitat, I want to hear from you!

What is your approach to life, your strategy?

Why have you (not) given up?

How do you deal with economic hardship?

I want to know how you approach these and other related questions. I am writing a book that offers you a framework. I want feedback on whether it makes sense to you.

Reply below to share your thoughts.

Share this post and I'll send you a sample chapter.

Athlete of the Soul

It sounds fake and gay, but there are athletes of the soul out there. Compelled by fate or as acquired taste, they keep on picking the hardest challenges to undergo. Not necessarily physically or even mentally, although those too. No, they train the soul. When few choices are hard, only hard choices actually made differentiate you from the rest. That much has always been true, and perhaps this truly is not anything new, and yet, it feels that way to me.

Don't let the staccato nature of your thoughts stop letting them flow, just shoot, aim, and go. I have worried, and that perhaps is my gravest sin. Imagination belongs to the uses that produce the greatest bounty, and worry just consumes it. It really is true that people throw away their lives for the triflest things. A Taylor Swift concert, the banana peel purposely laid out for a practical joke. People die for the stupidest of reasons, and they give up their lives without dying for even stupider reasons still.

I watched this John Mayer video once where he explains his creative process and it's what I employ just this very moment to write this piece. You just start strumming, or in my case writing, and you make it work. Don't think about it, do it, and do it, and do it more. The craziest thing is what this process yields. It's not even a process so much as a gusto, a deeply vitalistic impulse, an expression of faith. Small perhaps, yes, but one nonetheless.

Writing has been a strangely bimodal affair for me: I rarely do it but when I do, it consumes me completely. I largely attribute it to having very little to say. Some squawk as a way of life, but rarely have I seen those constitutional squawkers edify anyone, let alone themselves.

The drafts are working material I’m keeping to myself for now, but maybe I’ll make them public when I publish — not a terrible idea!

I’ll likely publish the book both in physical form and online. Just follow me here or on X or Substack and you won’t miss it.