Next bull run might be longer than expected... and higher...
#bitcoin #nostr
Whats up with Primal app payments not processing recently? Seen it twice in last 2 days. I've been trying to zap really important Creed memes and I cant 😜
#nostr #primal
Not the govt I'm worried about unfortunately. More the oligarchic forces which control it.
I think its all a controlled demolition anyhow. They'll make it look like the western world is ending just to make us love them when they rescue us from the scenario they deliberately created behind the political curtain.
Wow a politician pandering to the voters before an election. Who would have thunk it.
I don't think the USD will die anytime soon like in the next 100 years.
The Bitcoin Blackrock owns as well as all the other assets and the new green energy tokenization of assets will serve to rebase the fiat money system and it will continue.
Bitcoin will remain intact and owners will still have a pristine asset. The best asset.
#bitcoin #nostr
Tell em Blackrock recommends 28% so 5 is fine but maybe not enough. Anything off 0 great start at this stage.
OK I managed to listen to this mostly.
A lot of the message from nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuhsqgzrapl4csk9ky7pjwl3umefwsx259puuqfz3tjt6jcxy4yrgkqv4ga64368 and Mark Goodwin of nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxxatjwfjkuapwveukjtcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt4w35ku7thv9kxcet59e3k7mf0qqs9n7lwwd5a7acnmwl6nw7mpzfvvt46j2fryc2udle8sldrsn9hwrczyes4m amount to 'warnings' that Larry Fink and Blackrock (and others), while pumping the BTC price higher (Scott Stapp: can you take me higher!? :P) are not to be thought of as 'good' in general and have a history of criminality. I agree with that but I guess my original question was more technical - how can they affect the Bitcoin Network technically and disrupt it? I don't think they can at least in the short term baring some technological revolution which I don't rule out - but thats another topic for me to talk about later. This podcast doesn't deal with the technical aspects but listening to it did give me some food for thought and further my understanding.
One way they might 'nefariously use' Bitcoin is to use it as a collateral to rebase their debt ridden system ie re-collateralize the US Govt debt so that the ratio of debt to valuable hard assets is more favourable and hence the economic system is not in jeopardy. This could mean the existing financial system is not in jeopardy as some say and they can continue to have a lot of economic resource in a fiat system. They would not base this on Bitcoin but more likely XRP or ISO20022 based tokens imo.
Whitney outlines that this concept is in line with their existing work to tokenize natural resources in a new 'green investment' initiatives.
In essence they are recollateralising the debt with hard assets like natural resources (forests, lakes etc) and Bitcoin which in some sense is just cryptographic energy (energy being a hard asset also) a la nostr:nprofile1qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttjv4kxz7fwwak8vuewwdcxzcm99uq3samnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvekhgtnhd9azucnf0ghszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcqyz35razll96c74c2yxcqpstafef68fyhequh7fkqumtpukk0l3afstqwvvw understanding of Bitcoin.
Another interesting aspect Webb and Goodwin illuminate is their 'rhetorical dexterity'. One of the ways that Blackrock and large players work is that they change their rhetoric based on the political winds. Eg WEF does lefty rhetoric (and policy) for a while -> people become wise to it and sick of it and rebel politically (eg farmers all around the world but specifically Dutch farmers). They then just start to do right wing rhetoric like 'free markets' type stuff so people are not upset at them anymore.
For eg, at WEF conference Milei seemingly criticised the WEF and its policies but in reality the WEF doesn't mind if he does as they are probably working together and are simply changing their rhetoric to right for a few years til people become wise to that angle as well.
The WEF and other oligarchs lets say have the ability to switch rhetorics and still maintain their goals of enriching themselves while enslaving the rest of us. This is because the WEF is about public/private partnership at a high level and that can take the form of a focus on public control ie govt or private control eg supposed 'free markets'. Thing is that in both govt and free market versions of rhetoric the power ultimately still rests with oligarchs who still have the resource to fund and corrupt the players in each scenario. After all, in a recollateralised system as described above they still have the ability to do 'fiat' creation of money and continually fund the same type of corruption of left and right politics as they have been doing.
Both the left and the right has ways in which they can control. Their main goal is control not that it needs to be control from the left of right specifically. They are all just different 'faces' to the oligarchy anyhow. Very good observation their by Webb and Goodwin and aligns with my own understandings of how power operates.
#bitcoin #saylor #plebchain #asknostr #nostr #politics #etf #larryfink #dimon
Yes that's true. Bitcoin is harder to control than other tech. Who can say why a Satist likes bitcoin buy even the dumb ones can use it. Of course that's great accessibility in a way and perhaps a cruel duality of human nature that even the wretches of society can use it.
Bitcoin is for everyone even the Satists.
Some people use a spiritual scale of 'service to self' at one extreme and 'service to others' at the other. Where these kids fall on that may signif dictate what they do with their potential and IQ.
Remember when good will hunting didn't work for govt cos he didn't want to bomb innocents he didn't even know. He's service to others and High IQ. Just an example 🫡
Ah yes that may colour it. Jordan's was like 140 if I remember. Google the 'Big 5 psychological test'. Not IQ but other characteristics like conscientiouness are measured.
I think IQ is overrated. Important but used as a single metric of success which I dont think is accurate. Jordan Petersen says the best predictor of success in life is 'conscientiousness' aka the ability to continually show up to something (job for eg) and keep plugging away. Not that IQ isnt important - you still need a decent IQ but its not the be all and end of of potential.
Potential is also subjective. Potential to do harm or good? I suppose that is a moral or perhaps spiritual aspect.
If Bitcoin hits $1 million USD then each Sat is worth $0.01 if I've done my math right.
(have I done that right? 1,000,000 / 100,000,000 = 0.01)
Thats means I've earned over $140 Cuck Bucks from Nostr and given away about half of that to other Nostriches.
Where I live that is a significant amount of bills and food etc. Thats pretty cooool!
#nostr #bitcoin #sats #plebchain // Scheduled post from Nostr Growth Client
thanks, its long but Ill try to read!
Importing that shit :P
What harm does Blackrock owning lots of BTC do exactly?
They cant control the Network - at least short/medium term I guess.
They would have a lot of economic energy to do nefarious things. Thats bad.
They could get "hacked" via Coinbase who custodies for them. By hacked I really mean all the BTC is somehow stolen by the Govt or whoever and its sold to the plebs as a "Russian Hack" for eg.
Have a I missed anything?
#asknostr #bitcoin #nostr // Scheduled post from Nostr Growth Client