7e
HashTrash4Cash
7ef37446948c53557678af186320aff2ec9cc3b3300c0ddd79f769c3679378ae

Philosophical i agree. But the spell check struggle is real. It’s all I can do to maintain the veneer of a literate person.

I don’t think it’s accurate to say bitcoin is the only money ever bonded to energy. Gold is bonded to energy in a vaguely similar way. It’s called *mining* btc for a reason.

I agreed the bill is nuts and wouldn’t pass its first court review but the article mentions one single FL state legislator. If we are going to talk about every crazy bill, from any state legislator, in any state, that will likely never even be voted on, we are going to be here a long, Long, LONG, time.

If the long term state of affairs is that it’s not even supported then i would agree. However if it’s a short term item of expediency/ convenience then I think it’s a reasonable trade off to build participation in Nosta. Given the sorry state of censorship in social media I’m not inclined to be religiously dogmatic about the path to a better state.

#[0]​ Can I just assume ~75% of all users follow you and use your follower count as a users count? :) Only half joking.

ok fair enough. I over simplified it as well by only taking the meaning of “a house on some land”. If taken to mean housing in any form(more reasonable in an economic context) land scarcity can be discounted by tech making it easier to build up.

Still I am not so sure it’s as easy as saying there is a surplus of land. Land is the ultimate non-fungible item. It all depends on where the demand is and where to supply is.

This was a great article! I have heart about most of the modern adjustments to the COI but I have not read a history that went back to the beginning.

I would nit pick one item. I think the example of the cost of a house is over simplified. Land is a scarce resource so as the population increases I would expect the price to rise even against stable money.

Ok fair enough. I’m interested because I think it will have a non-trivial affect on bitcoin. There’s a saying or adage from economics, bad money drives out good.

Honesty I don’t really think the main point should be about solar, nuclear, whatever. If the energy was still going to be used for something else then it’s zero sum from their point of view. It should be about trapped or very low demand times / locations. Energy that would not have been used otherwise or generation that would not have been economically viable without bitcoin as a base load demand creator. #[2]​ had someone on his show from Texas Blockchain Council(sorry if I butchered the org name) recently that was talking in this area. They did quite put it the way I stated it but was along the same lines.