If you're in the mood for some baller Punjabi rap.
Poorly worded question on my part. I know what they are, I just don't know how to set them up 😅
What are zaps? How do I set up zap for myself on Android?
Brother, I can assure you, nothing, and I repeat, *nothing*, in America is even *remotely* Communist. This is the result of decidedly imperial sabotage of the national polity.
The term 'CRT' itself falls under this category; DEI does not. 'CRT' is repeated by people consuming sensationalized media who don't have the terminology or the epistemic werewithal to express their concerns about a very real trend across education, corporate culture, and governmental bureaucracy.
The emphasis on DEI being co-equal, even superseding, education itself as a directive in most educational institutions; instead of being a subordinate goal intended to remove any obstacles that might be faced in the *primary* goal of education.
All DEI in general; but it's so much more than that.
Guess we'll have to see. Hope it turns out like you said. 🤞
You're restricting the scope to the most talented, highest paid people, solving the hardest problems. STEM is far larger than that; and I have it on good authority that the level of rigour is dropping across multiple other fields.
By skewing incentives. Better to post for the love of the game than for zaps, imo.
> There's a difference between "asshole" and "dissenter".
True, but all "dissenters" will naturally be assigned the designation of "assholes".
> How would the rich be advantaged?
You simply zap people to push your narrative all day and drown out anyone else.
Here's a great video of Michael Hudson explaining his thesis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-pCed-mPVw&ab_channel=%E5%9B%BD%E4%BB%81%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%A0%82
Here you go: https://michael-hudson.com/
I told you. The answer is 'none'. Most people don't even have the tools to parse the intent of the piece, the source, the weasel words, and the inference being pushed, let alone the place it needs to be assigned in the larger Dialectic.
People would be better off shutting the news off completely and studying history and literature. First, build a hermeneutic. Complete your education. You have to *make* it make sense.
It *can* be true, but my experience has generally been the opposite. Institutional credentials are usually an anti-signal of quality in the humanities and in mainstream media. (This is also becoming the case in STEM fields at a worrying pace.)
I've seen far better scholarship from people who have been sidelined from the spotlight.
If you're talking about the US, I beg to differ. These people are far more likely to be vindicated, given enough time and in the aggregate; even though they sometimes produce complete kookery.
On the other hand, "smart people" are the easiest to fool.
This is excellent advice. What's more, it's also true in the temporal dimension - you should generally be wary of 'breaking news'. The best news source is research into historic events by investigators, researchers, and (real) journalists.
Twitter is the best, provided you've curated your feed smartly.
The worship of Mammon over the brotherhood of Adam is, by itself, inherently people destroying. Plenty of Christian and non-Abrahamic cultures alike can attest to this fact, even those with zero Jewish populations.