Avatar
anon
82a1e67bfa9dbd6e3b117a1b18743d86aff8450e93d034d4757ca49656b64d29
#Bitcoin & #Nostr only
Replying to Avatar Nathan

In addition, if MSTR/nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m hang onto the stack into the future, there’s a very high likelihood that other firms and/or their owners end up *needing* Bitcoin because they don’t yet own any.

If that happens, MSTR gets to buy whole companies or large amounts of equity of other companies at great valuations *in Bitcoin terms* because he’s the only guy on the block w/ enough bitcoin to make these purchases.

If this happens, this is the beginning of MSTR becoming the new Berkshire which would make Saylor the new Buffett and that’s a role he’d play really well.

My guess is that others such as nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7z & nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l also see this as a very plausible long term outcome for MSTR/Saylor. nostr:note1rnt8cttfplvqtghjx7mpmeffqatncdcscplm4g3lwrnw887sr2sq6gq9gq

🎯

Replying to Avatar Nathan

No surprise, $MSTR issued more stock to do it. (See below.)

This was the right move as the stock has been trading at a high premium above its #bitcoin holdings, higher than the operating company is worth. ($MSTR should trade at a premium above its bitcoin holdings as hr operating company also has value, the question is how much.)

I believe nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m is laser eye focused on one metric: *sats per share.* He’ll do anything that doesn’t threaten the stack to increase it.

IMO, he’s a brilliant capital allocator.

This is why I had my mom buy some MSTR shares back when the stock was trading at the price of the bitcoin plus $8 for the operating company. It’s was a steal. Since then both Bitcoin and the MSTR premium have soared.

Now, if only Saylor can enter into a tiny loan he uses to buy bitcoin. Then when Bitcoin goes down & every lazy person who can’t be bothered to understand the loan agreement thinks MSTR is going to default pushes the stock to a large discount, he *buys back* shares and demonstrate to Wall Street what real capital allocation looks like.

When Bitcoin tanked, and as a result MSTR tanked because lazy people thought MSTR was at risk of defaulting on the Silvergate Loan, I moved my GBTC into MSTR & netted a bunch of sats. I’ve since moved back into GBTC, then OBTC, and then back into GBTC again netting me a bunch more sats.

I’m waiting for the MSTR premium to come back down to move out of GBTC into MSTR which is, all things being equal, the better play. (No fee, an operating company that will keep generating free cash flow to stack more sats, and one of the best capital allocators in the business.)

My guess is the divergence between the GBTC discount and the MSTR premium closes when a Bitcoin spot etf gets approved/launched. So that’s what I’m keeping my laser eyed focus on. nostr:note1pk7c7gqws528u8kgrnfefx0yljnhh7m49v3nnu6xca8l5f03wevslfrpd5

Great read, Nathan. Thank you for posting. What would be your $MSTR price target to go back in?

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

What would it look like, if an emergent money was being monetized?

Often when I talk with academics or other high-IQ critics of bitcoin, it’s the volatility and seemingly speculative aspect of it that turns them off. It’s almost distasteful to them. They can get behind the idea of global open-source payments and so forth, “but that’s not why people buy it” they’ll say. “They buy it because they’re speculating. It’s too volatile for its own good.” Some aspect of them dislikes it in principle, almost *because* one can make money from it.

But a new decentralized money, including its own unit of account and liquidity, doesn’t just emerge as a multi-trillion dollar-equivalent network out of the box. In order to go from zero to trillions in market capitalization and liquidity, it needs upside volatility. And with upside volatility comes speculation, leverage, and downside volatility. Cycle after cycle, it’s priced like an option. At first it’s like a 0.1% chance that it succeeds in the long run. And then in the next cycle it’s like 1%. And then in the next cycle it’s like 5%, and so forth. So, early capital allocators that have seen a thing or two and know the high failure rate of new ideas will say, “This’ll probably fail, but if it doesn’t, both the investment gains and the macro implications will be enormous.” And then 15 years into it with a few more cycles under its belt, the probability of success looks less like a distant moonshot and more like a real possibility, and then eventually starts to look like the base case. In the beginning the question is, “how will this succeed?” and at later stages the question becomes, “what risks could prevent this from continuing to succeed?”

The process of buying bitcoin is often a speculative process at first, but then as people learn more, they often view it differently. Those that really want speculation will then continue down the pipeline of altcoins- there’s always some shiny new object to try to speculate on. On the other hand, those who begin viewing bitcoin as money, start to view it as a defensive or risk-off act to hold a piece of this liquid and globally decentralized network of value. One would feel too financially exposed not to.

🎯

Replying to Avatar mcshane

💪⚡️⛏️