Avatar
LogicallyMinded
83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7
Crypto trader. Independent thinker diligently working to move the Overton window closer to the truth. Advocate for decentralized governance models and freedom tech. Banned from Twitter for denouncing the vax pass. Don’t follow if you can’t handle the truth! XMR: 88RzWHVvdifJHwf1nsfVBrLYm8D5hFUcWHMtPK8F3TkzLLe2rqHkfNAUBQ2dSU1tTQenfSoXtqnxSMNiCaMekZ6wUMWtgnB

This can’t explain alone this type of rise. Other countries don’t see a similar rise.

Replying to Avatar hh

I honestly don't think crypto has anything to do with this. He wasn't pro-crypto in 2016 and they already stopped short of an assassination attempt (there was one, but it didn't look they had a direct hand in it, unlike this last one).

The problem with Trump is not that he is a "pro-freedom maverick" of sorts. He is simply an partial outsider. He is enough of an insider that he had money and connections plenty to manage to coopt the GOP and liquidate the neocon rats in it (for now). But he is not the type of insider they can simply allow to freely roam the halls of power.

His first term was very ineffective in "draining the swamp". I get it -- insurmountable inside resistance and he didn't know the buttons and levers. Now he does, a lot better, and so does his team. So the danger he represents is exponentially larger -- he may now know exactly what drawers to open, and there's way too much information that isn't meant for his eyes...

Enough to merit an assassination.

So, while as an anarchist-leaning libertarian, in an ideal world I would never support him on his own merits as a politician, I do agree that in this imperfect world, as a potential agent of change or, at the very least, as a thorn on the side of the actual status quo, of course he has my moral support and I think his victory in the elections is the best option among all the scenarios with a probability of happening.

That is, a Biden/Democrat presidency, which is a presidency of the Uniparty of war and terror, regardless of the candidate; a Republican presidency with a neocon candidate, that is, again the Uniparty of war and terror; or Trump with its potential for chaos and, maybe, change.

nostr:nevent1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9ekh2arfdeuhwctvd3jhgtnrdakj7qgkwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhyetvv9ujucm0d5hsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshsz9rhwden5te0wfjkcctev93xcefwdaexwtcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsqgrw782chktmsk4l726x4pfvp0dy3zc3k8a52fzce9lr6kaatkk74utl4v5d

The problem is not that #Trump was ineffective at draining the swamp but that he actually appointed the swamp to his administration(Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of #Epstein). I think your perspective is too complacent with Trump. Either the guy is playing games and fooling us (my preferred assumption) or he’s being fooled and incapable of leading (which seems inconsistent with his character). If the former is true, then we should have no expectation that the guy would be doing any better in a second term.

Don’t forget that while #Trump got elected in 2016 with the promise of “draining the swamp”, he actually “appointed the swamp” to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of #Epstein) so take Trump’s campaign promises with a grain of salt. As they said, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

Have we ever had any clarity on the Las Vegas shooting? No. It will be the same for the #TrumpAssassination. In a few weeks the mockingbird media will have moved on to the next thing leaving us with the official storyline and its loose ends.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ron-paul-why-well-never-know-what-really-happened-i-butler-pa

Yeah, I’d like to know what data (if any) they’ve used for the bullets. Without more details it looks more like this representation with no factual basis and has either been produced for views or disinformation.

I don’t have the same view on Trump’s role. I think he’s far to be an outsider and he become owned by the deep state and particularly the Rothschild who bailed him out after his Casino business failed. He is not more, nor less involved with the deep state than Biden is. He’s also been deeply involved with Epstein and the role he played in the Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) still remain incoherent with the narrative that Trump would be an outsider. If interested for the details, I recently posted two videos from Jake Morphonios on my profile documenting some of the elements I’m referring to.

I don’t disagree that it’s probably too simplistic to see the deep state as a unified monolithic network of convergent interests. That said, I think the operational capabilities are strongly concentrated in the hands of a few key players. There is a lot of consistency in how false flags have been conducted over the past years. We can’t exclude that this assassination attempt would have be ordered by the Biden camp, but it’s also possible that both Trump and Biden are owned by the same interests.

Correct me if I misunderstanding your views but you seem to imply that Trump’s goals don’t align with those of the deep state. However, there is a lot of evidence that Trump has strong ties with deep state actors such as the Rothschild, Epstein or Soros hence, I currently don’t buy the narrative that the deep state has to prevent #Trump from gaining the Oval Office. It would very certainly benefit like they did when Trump gave key positions in his first administration to deep state figures.

Not exactly. This theory aligns the operating methods we’ve seen in past #FalseFag operations conducted by the #DeepState. Those often consist in relying on a #MKUltra asset (the shooter) and to shock the public to push or reinforce a narrative. This wouldn’t be an operation conducted by #Trump and its staff but by the deep state. There are many tangible elements demonstrating that Trump has numerous ties with the deep state including the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros. I recently posted some mirrored videos on my profile if you’re interested in understanding what I’m referring to.

I agree but that’s not what I’m suggesting could have happened. I actually discount the possibility that a shooter could have aimed and shoot at the ear. However, how sure can you be that Trump’s ear actually got pierce by a bullet? Do we have any definitive evidence? I don’t think so. What I’m suggesting is that the shooter could have shot at the crowd leaving enough safety margin to not hit Trump. It would still be a stunt with a level of risk for Trump but I think a skilled shooter could minimize the risk close to 0.

I have not but are you implying that it would have been a gamble for a skilled shooter to avoid a target in these conditions?

Probably just a coincidence, but it’s interesting to note that #Trump was turning to his right to comment a slide just before the shooting took place. Would he have had faced his stand instead, he wouldn’t have been in alignment with the shooter and a bullet couldn’t have grazed his ear. But hey, Trump had the divine protection of the gods that day.

You can see the sequence at 5:15 min.

#TrumpAssassination

https://youtu.be/JW3X-nmHKmM

Replying to Avatar Ivan

RFK Jr phone call with Trump leaked

https://v.nostr.build/ygPbAVrUPUV5zKrA.mp4

“I agree with you, man. Something's wrong with that whole system, and it's the doctors you find.

Remember I said I want to do small doses. Small doses. When you feed a baby, Bobby, a vaccination that is like 38 different vaccines,and it looks like it's meant for a horse, not a you know, 10-pound or 20-pound baby.

It looks like you're giving, you should be giving a horse this, and do you ever see the size of it. It’s so massive and then you see the baby all of a sudden starting to change radically. I've seen it too many times.

And then you hear that it doesn't have an impact, right?

But you and I talked about that a long time ago. Anyway, I would love you to do something and I think it would be so good for you, and so big for you.”

RFK needs to be more careful about who he brings in his circle. The #Trump camp has been aligning his messaging on #Kennedy24 talking points. #Bitcoin, chronic diseases, unity and now vaccines. Not credible but it will fool the mass.

If it’s a false flag, I certainly don’t think that the shooter would have aimed at #Trump’s ear. He could have shot at a safe distance from him, aiming at the crowd. So if Trump’s ear really got blasted by a bullet, I would disregard the false flag scenario but so far, there is no definitive evidence that it’s what happened (and we’ll probably never have any way to verify this element).

I would disagree that #Trump winning was a done deal. Trump doesn’t have the same popular support that he had in 2016 (look at the attendance of his rallies) because many of its core supporters felt they were fooled by his mismanagement of Covid-19 and the Qanon psyop in which he participated in. Also, #Kennedy polling at 20% is a threat to the two-party system. Whether or not this assassination attempt was a false flag, it’s clear that Trump will benefit. RFK is the one who will lose from this event.

Replying to Avatar gsovereignty

But who tried to kill him?