8f
Ed
8f06a7f2e17498a083c886793f83b78964c77e8b8101ca23453d9f64ddde549f

I would argue the next stop is actually "Bit parity" at 125k. Where,1 Bit (100 sats) equals 1 Bit (12.5 cents USD *).

*This derives from the use of Spanish pieces of eight as early US currency.

A HODLer hunkers down and survives BTC winter. A Maximalist goes out and plays in the snow.

Fission power uses fuel made by ancient fusion power plants.

Replying to Avatar HODL

GM ☀️

Why do we say GM?

Nostr represents a radical leap toward a freer, more dynamic internet. With Nostr we get absolute free speech, open competition, and genuine user autonomy.

On Nostr, we control our identities through cryptographic keys, so we can join any community we want without losing our followers, content, or voice.

And because the network relies on many independent “relays” rather than a single central server, there’s no single gatekeeper to censor or deplatform you.

By integrating Bitcoin’s Lightning Network for micropayments, Nostr opens new possibilities for creators and entrepreneurs. Imagine zapping someone a few cents for a clever post or paying directly for valuable insights—no middleman, no hidden fees. It transforms social media into a global marketplace of ideas and services, free from the advertising-driven business models that dominate Big Tech.

Nostr offers a blueprint for disrupting entrenched monopolies in the same way open-source software upended proprietary giants. Instead of complaining about Silicon Valley’s control, we can build a world where users own their data, creators earn directly from their audience, and innovation happens in the open. It’s a rare glimpse of real progress—one that puts individual freedom and entrepreneurial spirit front and center.

We’re witnessing the reemergence of a truly open internet. If you believe that tech should empower people rather than exploit them, Nostr is where you want to be spending your time. Nostr is the most promising and disruptive idea since Bitcoin.

And on Nostr we say GM.

GM

You will get a ton of advice about brand and type. The specifics of your use case will have a great deal of impact on the optimal choice.

Short answer, I would recommend training. Then likely a semi-auto 9mm handgun or AR15 rifle depending on the peticulars. Renting or borrowing a few examples and gaining your own perspective is highly recommended.

Most major manufacturers make reasonably reliable products these days. Additionally, any defensive firearm should be trained with, to at least some degree, to validate it operates properly.

For someone of smaller stature, especially without much training, I would avoid shotguns. This is due to relatively high recoil, low ammunition capacity, and a greater training requirement to operate a pump action reliably under duress. Semi-auto shotguns are available, but can be picky about ammunition choice and still have the other drawbacks.

Semi-automatic handguns, specifically in 9mm offer low recoil and simple operation. They can require training to use accurately, but are easier to manuver with if you need to move from one end of the house to the other. I.E. to retrieve children, etc. As they can be used one handed, they allow use of a phone to summon help while still at the ready.

Semi-auto rifles like the AR15 can be easier to use accurately, and carry significant ammunition with relatively low recoil. They are more difficult to manuver with and require two hands, so may be the best option if the strategy is to stay put in an area like a bedroom.

This is just one plebs opinion, and I am by no means a professional in this space, but hopefully it helps.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

One of the crazy things about AI and robotics is that in the year 2025, most people still don't use Roombas or other robotic vacuum cleaners.

They're useful in many contexts, but they're not clearly better across most metrics than a human with a vacuum cleaner yet. They've been out for a very long time, gradually improving. And that's one *very specific* task with pretty clear visualization requirements and floor mobility requirements and pretty low safety thresholds with high repetition levels, and yet that market isn't dominated by robotics yet.

That's an example of why I continue to view white collar computer-work AI as being *way* ahead of in-the-field blue collar robotic AI in terms of competing with human jobs.

The moment where it's a joke to buy a human-powered vacuum instead of a robot vacuum, rather than a debatable trade-off, is kind of the canary in the coal mine moment for consumer robotics. We can't even nail that yet, but once we do, it's kind of a floodgate moment, considering how long that task has been in the works for, and it will probably quickly expand to other areas following that moment.

That's kind of my basic test for robot hype. Yes, they're getting better and better. Yes, they do backflips now. Yes, it's a big deal. But in-the-field blue collar skilled work is a really high bar, and we haven't fully cleared the "vacuum carpeted areas of the same house floor area over and over" stage of that yet.

Everything is kind of hype until that stage is fully breached. Then it's off to the races.

What's your view of that heuristic?

I maintain the view that we will see a robot CEO before we see a robot plumber.

The poison is in the dose.