It’s always the same with the people claiming „Nostr isn’t innovative and not censorship“ resistant.
They need to redefine censorship from well, censorship to „if I cannot force everybody to listen, it’s censorship“
You have a lack of humor problem 🤷
Equality of outcome is the opposite of equality of outcome. „Equality“ has become bastardized into meaning the latter lately.
Keine Sorge, arbeite ja nebenbei. Ist nur eine halbe Gehirnzelle, die ich dafür investiere.
Kann mal jemand den link Posten, bitte? Brauche heute neben der Arbeit etwas Selbstkasteiung
You should consider fediverse. You can subscribe to all posts by a person so all posts go to notifications. + Much more mature and more control. (Pleroma+Soapbox servers especially) https://jointhefedi.com/ and you can still connect with nostr users #[6]
No zaps, no me, sorry.
Still. Just don’t do illegal things with Bitcoin.
Once you are done, I can recommend this:
https://geni.us/The_Essence_of_Money
EPUB and Pdf also available for Sats if you DM me.
Funnily enough YouTube uses much more power and I basically always have Damus open with YT in PiP only these days.
Also after I streamlined my relays, Damus uses basically negligible amounts of data.
Congrats #[2] great work.
Yes, but from my perspective Umbrel is the biggest danger to it, because they try to make users be like apple users and give up all control.
I like it. If you are used to iOS you know you need to Force Touch everything
Und gezapnapped.
The question is only if Umbrel is better than Apple.
They started quite open and now are even less open and transparent than Apple.
Wenn ich Zeit habe auf jeden Fall.
It’s crazy how people underestimate what will happen during the next halvings…
Look at the Hashrate. All these miners coming online largely pay their bills in Fiat.
Do you think they all are stupid and will go bankrupt?
Or do they know what will happen?
#[0]
Nostr is the perfect solution. Any algo can feed on the data and advertise to us, if and only if we want it.
But a lot of work is still needed before this will become real.
Whirlpool leaves deterministic links because it peels the change during the tx0 used to create sized equal outputs. I just unmixed the Whirlpool transaction from your screenshot to reveal the change: https://mempool.space/tx/323df21f0b0756f98336437aa3d2fb87e02b59f1946b714a7b09df04d429dec2
Address bc1qgwv9hn979rex0rhfp3cknfdkyrgk04493gclvv belonging to Whirlpool input 1 created 0.01346981 BTC in traceable change which has 100% deterministic links to bc1qjy3zud5c7qypvgccgvptvaxkcsg6g4jl3u4tdy
Address bc1q528pyda90y4j9nuqrcm65rlxz9txljtn208dqm belonging to Whirlpool input 3 created 0.01971146 BTC in traceable change which has 100% deterministic links to bc1q50akm6ggcwgjext09tuz0rcl6cya2huu70pef4
Feel free to post any other Whirlpool tx ids and I'll unmix them too.
Ne careful out there. Just because you bought P2P on the internet and coinjoin does not mean you are safe.
The peer might be a Fed and the coinjoin may now or in 20 years be reversed.
#[0]
Time chain as underlying technology



