Avatar
Tommy Volk
9226eda126c62e52a876e837485bd57b0509867bb0c731ee213723c66a1bde0e
Anarchist Software Engineer Making the state obsolete

The Federal Reserve threatened to sue Bitcoin Magazine over its FedNow merch. Their response is priceless: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/federal-reserve-threatens-to-sue-bitcoin-magazine

Will this lead to a Streisand effect? 👀

https://store.bitcoinmagazine.com/collections/fednow-series

With EU privacy regulation about to decimate ad revenue, Facebook might start charging for their services. Would you pay $17 per month to use Facebook? Would you even pay $4 to WP to read this article? I certainly wouldn't.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/10/31/facebook-subscription-no-ads/

Pre-lightning: "but you can't buy a coffee with Bitcoin!"

Post-lightning: "who would want to buy a coffee with Bitcoin?"

Happy (financial) reformation day!

I respectfully disagree.

To say that the nature of humans is suffering when the only humans you've seen are those under coercive control of governments is like seeing a zebra in a zoo and saying that the nature of zebras is to stay in one place.

I'm not saying the future will be free of all crime and conflict. But the world today incentives war, conflict, and the suffering of many to serve the few. So to say that war, conflict, and suffering are human nature isn't true - at least on grounds that the world today is full of suffering.

Bitcoin can break the chains of history by radically shifting incentives in a way we've never seen.

BP projects global oil consumption to flatten by 2025. What happens to the petrodollar after that?

Makes sense, thanks for the clarification! So this leaves the door wide open for non-coercive forms of punishing evil, rewarding good, and resolving disputes, right? To put it another way, do you think Anarcho-Capitalism and Christianity clash with one another? Asking as an An-Cap Christian who has received a lot of pushback from fellow Christians regarding the God-ordained nature of the state. The most common argument I get is essentially "God put these people in power, so fighting against them is fighting against what was ordained by God". The problem I see there is that no one would use that argument to justify blatant evil in their personal lives. No sane Christian would see someone getting mugged and not intervene because "well, God ordained that mugger to mug him, who am I to interfere with God's will?"

Referring to the limited-liability nature of corporations:

"Governments always need scapegoats for their own inevitable failures, and they love to point at the wealthy to strip-mine the resentments of the less successful. They want to take money from the rich and give it to the poor, but the problem then is that the rich don't want to make much money, or want to leave for another country, so they give rich people the legal protection of the corporation so they will still want to make money and stick around. And the media constantly repeats that corporations are a "feature of the free market" when they were never chosen by customers, but rather are imposed by governments. In fact, corporations would be specifically rejected by customers if they had any choice."

- Stefan Molyneux, The Future

Live free, subvert the state.

I just finished reading The Mandibles. Amazing book! But was anyone else completely dumbfound by the final chapter? I felt like all the characters completely changed.

This seems contradictory to me. I'd be interested to get your thoughts. So inflation is, in effect, a tax on savings. If the government were to stop printing money and instead impose a tax on savings, the effect would be largely the same. Is a savings tax moral but inflation immoral?