About the only thing we know for sure is that, yes, the climate always changes.
Is the current change unusual?
Nobody knows. There is simply no data to show what normal variation in global temperature (worth considering how elusive a notion this is) over the course of decades is.
Yep, COVID is rampant again - anyone arguing to keep schools open is basically a murderer at this point
"I paid by legal tender in this dystopian place."
https://nostr.build/av/5e8c767e08fd8c2cefb5c81fc6b574cdbda491f3e21a60d6b4347669585cc4e1.mp4
Piers corbyn is an absolute legend
Don’t get me wrong, mate, but this is something like my 10 years older might come up with. If this was caused by natural effects, that would be the case. But if you read the thread that I quoted, you can see my emperical knowledge on the issue. If I need to come to your reason, you can look at this note that I replied to nostr:npub18vdjk3mvdlkwhgfg9nrvy6qqnamchhxea55d8vasjyag95df2tgswzawt7 to explain global warming in very basic level. Cheers 🫂
nostr:note16n2f8mzcp73jpq4tfk86efvlykaunpnmw5vmpf2nrachadyjhlnqqhfrv3
No answer to my point?
Ok many reasons why it is but I'll try this 1:
It is indisputable that increased temp causes increased atmospheric co2 - as gases are less soluble in water with higher temp, plus ground melts releasing gas.
If the reverse were also true, and increased co2 led to increased temp, then any rise in temp or co2 through history would lead to runaway heating.
The fact that earth has not had runaway heating, despite continual climate change throughout history, shows either co2 doesn't cause temp rise, or else there is some overwhelming stabilization effect.
Either way the alarmism is nonsense.
(There are many other reasons)
I never wore a mask and was frequently the only person without one in shops etc.
I feel a slight kinship now with these people.
At any rate I respect them more than the sheep who only wore them because everyone else did and only don't because everyone else doesn't..
I shill them worldcoin 😁
And in a world where most mainstream content is derivative dross that can't be distinguished from the chat-gpt normie simulator, the only thing of value will be genuine human originality.
There is no alternative. If bitcoin fails, humanity dies.
social media is merely the first popular nostr enabled use case - there will be many different types of tools that use nostr as an interoperable communication protocol - none of us can comprehend the many creative use cases that will emerge
https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/swap-service-submarine-swaps-over-nostr/
Yes, when you zoom out it's obvious that everything that can be censored eventually will be.
So all communications will migrate to uncensorable systems, if they exist.
That means nostr and bitcoin.
There really is no alternative!
I think you are missing another possibility (on your 1 thru 5). They all know, at some level that this is wrong, but everyone around them is going along with it - and those people who don't go along with it are crushed, lose their funding and careers etc.
I have personally witnessed this, working in government. There was a bad thing going on that essentially everyone knew about, and would all agree was terrible (it was really bad) but 100% of them still went along with it - hundreds of people, including plenty of "scientists". I was literally the only person who didn't - but nobody would know that because I got pushed out.
It's natural human behaviour - we evolved so that the vast majority will follow the crowd and do whatever everyone else does, no matter how nonsensical or cruel. History and psychology are completely clear about this, eg Milgram experiment etc where people do totally ridiculous things, or take action that is apparently hurting people, apparently without limit as long as they think its expected. It's extremely difficult and rare for anyone to go against this.
But there are indeed dissident scientists who challenge AGW but they have all been vilified or silenced - and you certainly won't see them on mainstream media unless its in some kind of hit piece to try to destroy their credibility. Egs: Judith Curry, Willie Soon, William Happer
Nonsense, mainly.
Just one example, coral reefs aren't dying off its all cherry picking and fantasy
Ok well props to you for entertaining alternative viewpoints. Thats pretty rare these days and I appreciate amd value it.
But to do justice to your points i first need to set up a desktop nostr client as i can't talk properly by phone!
(Any recommendations for linux?)
İts less than that
I'd first need evidence that science was being done properly, with dissent and scepticism valued.
Then I'd need a model of the climate which got around the problem that the climate is a complex / chaotic system and basically impossible to model.
But none of this matters because the politics is now totally disconnected even from "The Science" as it stands. People literally think humans are going extinct this century and even ipcc says nothing remotely like that.
İt's a pure death cult
İt's religious
<1% for sure
I've been around long enough to remember the same people telling me there'd be no snow by 2010, polar bears will be extinct, coral reefs are dying
İts always been bullshit i can't believe people fall for jt
İ mean "climate emergency" seriously???
Exactly! Nothing to do with climate, it's more important than that..
.. just like masks and jabs, it's about showing (and enforcing) OBEDİENCE
Eh i thought the science was settled! 😁